Dataset Information

Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Ultrasonography is being increasingly utilized in acute care settings with expanding applications. Pneumothorax evaluation by ultrasonography is a fast, safe, easy and inexpensive alternative to chest radiographs. In this review, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the current literature comparing ultrasonography and chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax.

Methods

We searched English-language articles in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library dealing with both ultrasonography and chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax. In eligible studies that met strict inclusion criteria, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of pleural ultrasonography in comparison with chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax.

Results

We reviewed 601 articles and selected 25 original research articles for detailed review. Only 13 articles met all of our inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. One study used lung sliding sign alone, 12 studies used lung sliding and comet tail signs, and 6 studies searched for lung point in addition to the other two signs. Ultrasonography had a pooled sensitivity of 78.6% (95% CI, 68.1 to 98.1) and a specificity of 98.4% (95% CI, 97.3 to 99.5). Chest radiography had a pooled sensitivity of 39.8% (95% CI, 29.4 to 50.3) and a specificity of 99.3% (95% CI, 98.4 to 100). Our meta-regression and subgroup analyses indicate that consecutive sampling of patients compared to convenience sampling provided higher sensitivity results for both ultrasonography and chest radiography. Consecutive versus nonconsecutive sampling and trauma versus nontrauma settings were significant sources of heterogeneity. In addition, subgroup analysis showed significant variations related to operator and type of probe used.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that ultrasonography is more accurate than chest radiography for detection of pneumothorax. The results support the previous investigations in this field, add new valuable information obtained from subgroup analysis, and provide accurate estimates for the performance parameters of both bedside ultrasonography and chest radiography for pneumothorax evaluation.

SUBMITTER: Alrajab S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4057340 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Alrajab Saadah S Youssef Asser M AM Akkus Nuri I NI Caldito Gloria G

Critical care (London, England) 20130923 5

<h4>Introduction</h4>Ultrasonography is being increasingly utilized in acute care settings with expanding applications. Pneumothorax evaluation by ultrasonography is a fast, safe, easy and inexpensive alternative to chest radiographs. In this review, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the current literature comparing ultrasonography and chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched English-language articles in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library dealing wit ...[more]

PMID: 24060427

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn patients with multiple trauma, a supine chest radiography [chest X-ray (CXR)] is preferred over a erect CXR. However, this method has limitations in detecting post-traumatic pneumothorax. The use of chest computed tomography (CT) to detect traumatic pneumothorax is well known. However, pneumothorax that is not detected before a chest CT scan is known as an occult pneumothorax (OP), and it can cause serious complications in the patient. This study sought to evaluate the frequency and risk factors for OP in trauma patients.MethodsPatients who suffered thoracic trauma at the Level 1 Regional Trauma Center of Wonju Severance Christian Hospital between 2015 and 2022 were included in this study. All patients were at least 18 years old. The study reviewed all patients' supine CXR and chest CT images and classified them into five radiographic diagnoses: pneumothorax, rib fracture, subcutaneous emphysema, lung contusion, and pneumomediastinum.ResultsThe study included 1,284 patients, all with diagnoses of pneumothorax, rib fracture, subcutaneous emphysema, lung contusion, and pneumomediastinum following supine CXR and chest CT. The patient's average age was 58.3±15.2 years. Pneumothorax diagnosis on supine CXR had the lowest accuracy, at 46.7%, and the lowest sensitivity, at 12.7%. In univariate analysis, rib fracture, lung contusion, and subcutaneous emphysema on supine CXR were all found to be statistically significant regarding traumatic OP. In multivariate analysis, the risk factors for OP were lung contusion [odds ratio (OR), 1.440; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.115-1.860; P=0.005] and subcutaneous emphysema (OR, 25.883; 95% CI: 13.155-50.928; P<0.001) on supine CXR.ConclusionsThe lung contusion and subcutaneous emphysema in supine CXR of trauma patients indicate the presence of OP. Therefore, if chest CT cannot be performed immediately due to unstable vital signs or other circumstances, recognizing the above radiological findings of traumatic pneumothorax may be necessary.

Dataset Information

Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets