Dataset Information

How funding agencies can support research use in healthcare: an online province-wide survey to determine knowledge translation training needs.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Health research funding agencies are increasingly promoting evidence use in health practice and policy. Building on work suggesting how agencies can support such knowledge translation (KT), this paper discusses an online survey to assess KT training needs of researchers and research users as part of a Canadian provincial capacity-building effort.

Methods

The survey comprised 24 multiple choice and open-ended questions including demographics, interest in learning KT skills, likelihood of participating in training, and barriers and facilitators to doing KT at work. More than 1,200 people completed the survey. The high number of responses is attributed to an engagement strategy involving partner organizations (health authorities, research institutes, universities) in survey development and distribution. SPSS was used to analyze quantitative results according to respondents' primary role, geographic region, and work setting. Qualitative results were analyzed in NVivo.

Results

Over 85 percent of respondents are interested in learning more about the top KT skills identified. Research producers have higher interest in disseminating research results; research users are more interested in the application of research results. About one-half of respondents require beginner-level training in KT skills; one-quarter need advanced training. Time and cost constraints are the biggest barriers to participating in KT training. More than one-half of respondents have no financial support for travel and almost one-half lack support for registration fees. Time is the biggest challenge to integrating KT into work.

Conclusions

Online surveys are useful for determining knowledge translation training needs of researchers, research users and ultimately organizations. In this case, findings suggest the importance of considering all aspects of KT in training opportunities, while taking into account different stakeholder interests. Funders can play a role in developing new training opportunities as part of a broad effort, with partners, to build capacity for the use of health research evidence. Survey results would ideally be complemented with an objective needs assessment based on core competencies, and should be acted on in a way that acknowledges the complexity of knowledge translation in healthcare, existing training activities, and the expertise stakeholders already have but may not refer to as knowledge translation.

SUBMITTER: Holmes BJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4060070 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

How funding agencies can support research use in healthcare: an online province-wide survey to determine knowledge translation training needs.

Holmes Bev J BJ Schellenberg Megan M Schell Kara K Scarrow Gayle G

Implementation science : IS 20140606

<h4>Background</h4>Health research funding agencies are increasingly promoting evidence use in health practice and policy. Building on work suggesting how agencies can support such knowledge translation (KT), this paper discusses an online survey to assess KT training needs of researchers and research users as part of a Canadian provincial capacity-building effort.<h4>Methods</h4>The survey comprised 24 multiple choice and open-ended questions including demographics, interest in learning KT skil ...[more]

PMID: 24906229

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSevere combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is a group of life-threatening genetic disorders responsible for severe dysfunctions of the immune system. Despite the expansion of newborn screening in the U.S., there are gaps in healthcare providers' knowledge of SCID.MethodsWe recruited 277 U.S. healthcare providers for an online survey. The survey assessed providers' experience with SCID patients, knowledge about SCID, and needs and preferred formats for SCID-related informational resources. We examined differences between providers who have seen 2 or more patients with SCID (SCID provider group) and those who have seen 0-1 SCID patients (non-SCID provider group).ResultsOverall, 210 (75.8%) providers were included in the non-SCID provider group, and 121 (57.6%) of these providers were pediatricians. Compared to the SCID provider group, non-SCID provider group reported lower mean rating of SCID knowledge (x̄ = 4.8 vs. x̄ = 8.6, p < 0.0001) and higher informational needs. The largest informational needs identified by the non-SCID provider group were "understanding specific type of SCID" and "understanding what to expect across the lifespan." In the SCID provider group, the highest rated informational need was "family support referrals." Participants in the non-SCID provider group identified scientific publications and websites as preferred formats, with some variation between medical specialties.ConclusionBased on their experience with treating SCID patients, providers have varying levels of SCID knowledge and different informational needs. For providers who have encountered few SCID patients, informational needs start early, usually immediately after receiving a positive newborn screening result. These findings provide useful direction for the development and preferred outlets for receiving SCID-related information, with some variations between different types of providers. Results from this study will serve as a guide for creating relevant and accessible SCID resources for providers who can utilize them to improve care for SCID patients.

Project description:BackgroundThe use of administrative data in health and social science research continues to expand, with increased availability of data and interest from funders. Researchers, however, continue to experience delays in access, storage and sharing of administrative data. Training opportunities are limited and typically specific to individual data providers or focussed on the analytical aspects of working with administrative data. The CENTRIC study was funded by the Information Commissioners Office, with the aim of developing a broader training curriculum for researchers working with administrative data in the UK.MethodsA mixed-methods design informed curriculum content, including surveys with researchers, focus group discussions with data providers and workshops with members of the public. Researchers were identified from relevant administrative data networks and invited to participate in an online survey identifying training needs. Data providers were approached with a request to input to a face-to-face or online meeting with two members of the research team about their experiences of working with researchers. Data were analysed within the broad framework of the interview schedule, free text responses in the survey were analysed thematically.Results107 researchers responded to the online survey and four data providers participated in the focus groups. We identified five main themes, relating to research training needs for UK researchers working with administrative data: communication; timelines; changes & amendments; future-proofing applications; and, the availability of training and support. Data providers either provided additional evidence on these learning needs or ways to address identified challenges. Six modules were developed addressing these training needs. Quotes from the survey and focus groups are used anonymously in the online training modules.ConclusionThe CENTRIC online training curriculum was launched in September 2020 and is available, free of charge for UK researchers. CENTRIC specifically addresses commonly identified training needs of researchers working with administrative data.

Dataset Information

How funding agencies can support research use in healthcare: an online province-wide survey to determine knowledge translation training needs.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

How funding agencies can support research use in healthcare: an online province-wide survey to determine knowledge translation training needs.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets