Dataset Information

An investigation of associations between clinicians' ethnic or racial bias and hypertension treatment, medication adherence and blood pressure control.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Few studies have directly investigated the association of clinicians' implicit (unconscious) bias with health care disparities in clinical settings.

Objective

To determine if clinicians' implicit ethnic or racial bias is associated with processes and outcomes of treatment for hypertension among black and Latino patients, relative to white patients.

Research design and participants

Primary care clinicians completed Implicit Association Tests of ethnic and racial bias. Electronic medical records were queried for a stratified, random sample of the clinicians' black, Latino and white patients to assess treatment intensification, adherence and control of hypertension. Multilevel random coefficient models assessed the associations between clinicians' implicit biases and ethnic or racial differences in hypertension care and outcomes.

Main measures

Standard measures of treatment intensification and medication adherence were calculated from pharmacy refills. Hypertension control was assessed by the percentage of time that patients met blood pressure goals recorded during primary care visits.

Key results

One hundred and thirty-eight primary care clinicians and 4,794 patients with hypertension participated. Black patients received equivalent treatment intensification, but had lower medication adherence and worse hypertension control than white patients; Latino patients received equivalent treatment intensification and had similar hypertension control, but lower medication adherence than white patients. Differences in treatment intensification, medication adherence and hypertension control were unrelated to clinician implicit bias for black patients (P = 0.85, P = 0.06 and P = 0.31, respectively) and for Latino patients (P = 0.55, P = 0.40 and P = 0.79, respectively). An increase in clinician bias from average to strong was associated with a relative change of less than 5 % in all outcomes for black and Latino patients.

Conclusions

Implicit bias did not affect clinicians' provision of care to their minority patients, nor did it affect the patients' outcomes. The identification of health care contexts in which bias does not impact outcomes can assist both patients and clinicians in their efforts to build trust and partnership.

SUBMITTER: Blair IV

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4061371 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

An investigation of associations between clinicians' ethnic or racial bias and hypertension treatment, medication adherence and blood pressure control.

Blair Irene V IV Steiner John F JF Hanratty Rebecca R Price David W DW Fairclough Diane L DL Daugherty Stacie L SL Bronsert Michael M Magid David J DJ Havranek Edward P EP

Journal of general internal medicine 20140219 7

<h4>Background</h4>Few studies have directly investigated the association of clinicians' implicit (unconscious) bias with health care disparities in clinical settings.<h4>Objective</h4>To determine if clinicians' implicit ethnic or racial bias is associated with processes and outcomes of treatment for hypertension among black and Latino patients, relative to white patients.<h4>Research design and participants</h4>Primary care clinicians completed Implicit Association Tests of ethnic and racial b ...[more]

PMID: 24549521

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRacial/ethnic differences in the associations of smoking with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) and its subtypes (isolated uncontrolled systolic BP (SBP), uncontrolled systolic-diastolic BP, and isolated uncontrolled diastolic BP (DBP)) have not been investigated among diagnosed hypertensive subjects.MethodsA sample of 7,586 hypertensive patients aged ≥18 years were selected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2010. Race/ethnicity was classified into Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, and non-Hispanic black. Smoking was categorized as never smoking, ex-smoking, and current smoking. Uncontrolled BP was determined as SBP≥140 or DBP≥90 mm Hg. Isolated uncontrolled SBP was defined as SBP≥140 and DBP<90 mm Hg, uncontrolled SDBP as SBP≥140 and DBP≥90 mm Hg, and isolated uncontrolled DBP as SBP<140 and DBP≥90 mm Hg. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of uncontrolled BP and its subtypes were calculated using weighted logistic regression models.ResultsThe interaction effect of race and smoking was significant after adjustment for the full potential confounding covariates (Adjusted p = 0.0412). Compared to never smokers, current smokers were 29% less likely to have uncontrolled BP in non-Hispanic whites (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.56-0.90), although the likelihood for uncontrolled BP is the same for smokers and never smokers in Hispanics and non-Hispanic blacks. Current smokers were 26% less likely than never smokers to have isolated uncontrolled SBP in non-Hispanic whites (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58-0.95). However, current smoking is associated with an increased likelihood of uncontrolled systolic-diastolic BP in non-Hispanic blacks, and current smokers in this group were 70% more likely to have uncontrolled systolic-diastolic BP than never smokers (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.10-2.65).ConclusionThe associations between current smoking and uncontrolled BP differed over race/ethnicity. Health practitioners may need to be especially vigilant with non-Hispanic black smokers with diagnosed hypertension.

Project description:Background and Purpose- We assessed ethnic differences in medication adherence 3 months poststroke in a population-based study as an initial step in investigating the increased stroke recurrence risk in Mexican Americans compared with non-Hispanic whites. Methods- Ischemic stroke cases from 2008 to 2015 from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi project in Texas were followed prospectively for 3 months poststroke to assess medication adherence. Medications in 5 drug classes were analyzed: statins, antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antihypertensives, and antidepressants. For each drug class, patients were considered adherent if they reported never missing a dose in a typical week. The χ2 tests or Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests were used for ethnic comparisons of demographics, risk factors, and medication adherence. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed for the association of ethnicity and medication nonadherence. Results- Mexican Americans (n=692) were younger (median 65 years versus 68 years, P<0.001), had more diabetes mellitus ( P<0.001) and hypertension ( P<0.001) and less atrial fibrillation ( P=0.003), smoking ( P=0.003), and education ( P<0.001) than non-Hispanic whites (n=422). Sex, insurance status, high cholesterol, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack history, excessive alcohol use, tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) treatment, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and comorbidity index did not significantly differ by ethnicity. There was no significant difference in medication adherence for any of the 5 drug classes between Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites. Conclusions- This study did not find ethnic differences in medication adherence, thus challenging this patient-level factor as an explanation for stroke recurrence disparities. Other reasons for the excessive stroke recurrence burden in Mexican Americans, including provider and health system factors, should be explored.

Project description:ImportanceStereotype threat, or the fear of confirming a negative stereotype about one's social group, may contribute to racial differences in adherence to medications by decreasing patient activation to manage chronic conditions.ObjectiveTo examine whether a values affirmation writing exercise improves medication adherence and whether the effect differs by patient race.Design, setting, and participantsThe Hypertension and Values trial, a patient-level, blinded randomized clinical trial, compared an intervention and a control writing exercise delivered immediately prior to a clinic appointment. Of 20 777 eligible, self-identified non-Hispanic Black and White patients with uncontrolled hypertension who were taking blood pressure (BP) medications, 3891 were approached and 960 enrolled. Block randomization by self-identified race ensured balanced randomization. Patients enrolled between February 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019, at 11 US safety-net and community primary care clinics, with outcomes assessed at 3 and 6 months. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.InterventionsFrom a list of 11 values, intervention patients wrote about their most important values and control patients wrote about their least important values.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome of adherence to BP medications was measured using pharmacy fill data (proportion of days covered >90%) at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The secondary outcome was systolic and diastolic BP. Patient activation to manage their health was also measured.ResultsOf 960 patients, 474 (286 women [60.3%]; 256 Black patients [54.0%]; mean [SD] age, 63.4 [11.9] years) were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 486 (288 women [59.3%]; 272 Black patients [56.0%]; mean [SD] age, 62.8 [12.0] years) to the control group. Baseline medication adherence was lower (318 of 482 [66.0%] vs 331 of 412 [80.3%]) and mean (SE) BP higher among Black patients compared with White patients (systolic BP, 140.6 [18.5] vs 137.3 [17.8] mm Hg; diastolic BP, 83.9 [12.6] vs 79.7 [11.3] mm Hg). Compared with baseline, pharmacy fill adherence did not differ between intervention and control groups at 3 months (odds ratio [OR], 0.91 [95% CI, 0.57-1.43]) or at 6 months (OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.53-1.38]). There were also no treatment effect differences in pharmacy fill adherence by patient race (Black patients at 3 months: OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.61-1.92]; at 6 months: OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.58-1.87]; White patients at 3 months: OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.33-1.44]; at 6 months: OR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.24-1.27]). Immediately after the intervention, the median patient activation was higher in intervention patients than in control patients, but this difference was not statistically significant in an unadjusted comparison (75.0 [IQR, 65.5-84.8] vs 72.5 [IQR, 63.1-80.9]; P = .06). In adjusted models, the Patient Activation Measure score immediately after the intervention was significantly higher in the intervention patients than in control patients (mean difference, 2.3 [95% CI, 0.1-4.5]).Conclusions and relevanceA values affirmation intervention was associated with higher patient activation overall but did not improve adherence or blood pressure among Black and White patients with hypertension.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03028597.

Project description:Background: Few studies have investigated the association between medication literacy and medication adherence as well as the influence of medication literacy on medication adherence in hypertensive patients. Thus, the goal of the present study was to determine the association between medication literacy and medication adherence in hypertensive patients. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between August 2016 and December 2016. Self-administered questionnaires were completed, including a self-developed and structured socio-demographic questionnaire; a self-developed, validated, and self-reported Medication Literacy Scale for Hypertensive Patients (C-MLSHP) used for medication literacy measurement; and the Chinese Version of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (C-MMAS-8), an eight-item validated, self-report scale for adherence measurement with a total score range of 0-8. A cut-off of 6 was applied to differentiate adherence levels, including patients with an MMAS score <6 (low adherence), MMAS score = 8 (high adherence), and MMAS score ?6 and <8 (moderate adherence). In this study, hypertensive patients' medication literacy levels and adherence to antihypertensive agents were identified. Pearson correlation analysis was carried out to identify the correlation between medication literacy and adherence. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed with medication adherence as the outcome variable in order to confirm factors associated with medication adherence. Results: A total of 420 hypertensive patients, including 198 women and 222 men with a mean age of 60.6 years (SD = 12.4), were recruited. The mean score of hypertensive patients on the medication literacy scale was 24.03 (SD = 5.13). The mean scores of the four dimensions of knowledge, attitude, skill, and behavior on the medication literacy scale of this study were 6.22 ± 2.22, 5.04 ± 1.16, 4.50 ± 2.21, and 8.27 ± 1.90, respectively. Regarding medication adherence, the mean score of the C-MMAS-8 in this study was 4.82 (SD = 2.11). A total of 63.6% of patients presented with low adherence, 29.5% presented with moderate adherence, and 7.6% presented with high adherence. The Pearson correlation results showed that medication literacy (r = 0.342, P < 0.01) as a whole variable and the three dimensions of knowledge (r = 0.284, P < 0.01), attitude (r = 0.405, P < 0.01), and behavior (r = 0.237, P < 0.01) were significantly associated with medication adherence. Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that annual income [OR 1.199 (95% CI: 1.011-1.421); P = 0.037] and two dimensions of attitude [OR 2.174 (95% CI: 1.748-2.706); P = 0.000] and behavior [OR 1.139 (95% CI: 1.002-1.294); P = 0.046] in medication literacy were found to be independent predictors of medication adherence. Individuals with better attitudes and behavior literacy in medication literacy were more likely to adhere to the use of antihypertensive agents. Those who had higher annual incomes were more likely to adhere to the use of antihypertensive agents. Conclusion: The levels of medication literacy and medication adherence of hypertensive patients are suboptimal and need to be improved in China. The level of medication literacy in patients with hypertension could affect their adherence to antihypertensive drugs. It was suggested that hypertensive patients' medication adherence could be improved and driven by increasing the medication literacy level, especially in the attitude and behavior domains. Pertinent strategies that are specific to several dimensions of medication literacy should be developed and implemented in order to promote full medication literacy among hypertensive patients, thus facilitating optimal adherence and blood pressure control.

Project description:Many studies have investigated racial/ethnic disparities in medication non-adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes using common measures such as medication possession ratio (MPR) or gaps between refills. All these measures including MPR are quasi-continuous and bounded and their distribution is usually skewed. Analysis of such measures using traditional regression methods that model mean changes in the dependent variable may fail to provide a full picture about differential patterns in non-adherence between groups.A retrospective cohort of 11,272 veterans with type 2 diabetes was assembled from Veterans Administration datasets from April 1996 to May 2006. The main outcome measure was MPR with quantile cutoffs Q1-Q4 taking values of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 0.9. Quantile-regression (QReg) was used to model the association between MPR and race/ethnicity after adjusting for covariates. Comparison was made with commonly used ordinary-least-squares (OLS) and generalized linear mixed models (GLMM).Quantile-regression showed that Non-Hispanic-Black (NHB) had statistically significantly lower MPR compared to Non-Hispanic-White (NHW) holding all other variables constant across all quantiles with estimates and p-values given as -3.4% (p = 0.11), -5.4% (p = 0.01), -3.1% (p = 0.001), and -2.00% (p = 0.001) for Q1 to Q4, respectively. Other racial/ethnic groups had lower adherence than NHW only in the lowest quantile (Q1) of about -6.3% (p = 0.003). In contrast, OLS and GLMM only showed differences in mean MPR between NHB and NHW while the mean MPR difference between other racial groups and NHW was not significant.Quantile regression is recommended for analysis of data that are heterogeneous such that the tails and the central location of the conditional distributions vary differently with the covariates. QReg provides a comprehensive view of the relationships between independent and dependent variables (i.e. not just centrally but also in the tails of the conditional distribution of the dependent variable). Indeed, without performing QReg at different quantiles, an investigator would have no way of assessing whether a difference in these relationships might exist.

Dataset Information

An investigation of associations between clinicians' ethnic or racial bias and hypertension treatment, medication adherence and blood pressure control.

Background

Objective

Research design and participants

Main measures

Key results

Conclusions

Publications

An investigation of associations between clinicians' ethnic or racial bias and hypertension treatment, medication adherence and blood pressure control.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets