Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Diagnoses, prevalence, and state-based federal spending for HIV prevention and treatment in the United States, 2006-2009.


ABSTRACT:

Background

In response to an article published in 2012 by officials at the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), an independent analysis of state-based federal resource allocation for HIV was conducted to determine if the funding accurately reflected diagnosis and prevalence rates.

Methods

Total state-based federal funding for HIV, state-based funding for HIV prevention, and state-based funding for HIV treatment were compared to state-based HIV diagnosis and prevalence rates from 2006-2009.

Results

Total state-based federal funding for HIV and funding for HIV prevention and treatment were highly correlated with HIV diagnosis and prevalence rates during the time horizon of the study; however, correlations between state-based HIV prevention funding and state-based HIV diagnosis rates were lower than the correlations between state-based HIV treatment funding and HIV prevalence.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that state-based federal resource allocation for HIV prevention and treatment may be better aligned with HIV diagnosis and prevalence rates than previously reported; however resource allocation for HIV prevention is less aligned than funding for HIV treatment signaling the need to reexamine state-based federal funding for HIV prevention.

SUBMITTER: Oglesby WH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4061532 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Diagnoses, prevalence, and state-based federal spending for HIV prevention and treatment in the United States, 2006-2009.

Oglesby Willie H WH   Smith Joseph L JL   Alemagno Sonia A SA  

AIDS research and therapy 20140606


<h4>Background</h4>In response to an article published in 2012 by officials at the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), an independent analysis of state-based federal resource allocation for HIV was conducted to determine if the funding accurately reflected diagnosis and prevalence rates.<h4>Methods</h4>Total state-based federal funding for HIV, state-based funding for HIV prevention, and state-based funding for HIV treatment were compared to state-based HIV diagnosis and prevalenc  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3149556 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5264107 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3375879 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3907184 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3618269 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6407843 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4842411 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7076808 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6484643 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8330900 | biostudies-literature