Dataset Information

Diabetes education: the experiences of young adults with type 1 diabetes.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Clinician-led diabetes education is a fundamental component of care to assist people with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-manage their disease. Recent initiatives to incorporate a more patient-centered approach to diabetes education have included recommendations to make such education more individualized. Yet there is a dearth of research that identifies patients' perceptions of clinician-led diabetes education. We aimed to describe the experience of diabetes education from the perspective of young adults with T1D.

Methods

We designed a self-reported survey for Australian adults, aged 18-35 years, with T1D. Participants (n = 150) were recruited by advertisements through diabetes consumer-organizations. Respondents were asked to rate aspects of clinician-led diabetes education and identify sources of self-education. To expand on the results of the survey we interviewed 33 respondents in focus groups.

Results

Survey

The majority of respondents (56.0%) were satisfied with the amount of continuing clinician-led diabetes education; 96.7% sought further self-education; 73.3% sourced more diabetes education themselves than that provided by their clinicians; 80.7% referred to diabetes organization websites for further education; and 30.0% used online chat-rooms and blogs for education. Focus groups: The three key themes that emerged from the interview data were deficiencies related to the pedagogy of diabetes education; knowledge deficiencies arising from the gap between theoretical diabetes education and practical reality; and the need for and problems associated with autonomous and peer-led diabetes education.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that there are opportunities to improve clinician led-diabetes education to improve patient outcomes by enhancing autonomous health-literacy skills and to incorporate peer-led diabetes education and support with clinician-led education. The results provide evidence for the potential value of patient engagement in quality improvement and health-service redesign.

SUBMITTER: Wiley J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4065294 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Preclinical models of type 1 diabetes mellitus exhibit marked declines in skeletal muscle health including significant impairments in muscle repair. The present study investigated, for the first time, whether muscle repair was altered in young adults with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes (T1D) following damaging exercise.In this cohort study, eighteen physically-active young adults (M=22.1, SEM=0.9 years) with T1D (n, male/female=4/5; MHbA1c= 58, SEMHbA1c=5.9 mmol/mol) and without T1D (n, male/female=4/5) performed 300 unilateral eccentric contractions (90°s-1) of the knee extensors. Prior to exercise, at 48-hours and at 96-hours after exercise, participants gave a venous blood sample and vastus lateralis biopsy and performed a maximal voluntary isometric knee extension. Skeletal muscle extracellular matrix content, and satellite cell content/proliferation were assessed by immunofluorescence. Transmission electron microscopy was used to quantify ultrastructural damage.Maximal isometric strength was comparable between T1D and their sex-matched control group prior to exercise for both sexes. Immediately following damaging exercise, strength was decreased in both groups but there was a moderate effect size for lower strength during recovery in the T1D group at both 48-hours and 96-hours. Serum creatine kinase, an indicator of muscle damage, was moderately higher in T1D participants compared to controls at rest, and exhibited a small elevation 96-hours after exercise. Immunofluorescence analyses showed satellite cell content was lower at all timepoints in those with type 1 diabetes. T1D participants demonstrated a moderate delay in satellite cell proliferation (as assessed by Pax7+/Ki67+ nuclei counts) after exercise, reaching peak levels of proliferation 48-hours after control participants. Despite these differences, those with T1D did not exhibit greater ultrastructural muscle damage than controls as assessed by electron microscopy. Finally, a transcriptomic investigation of T1D muscle revealed several networks of dysregulated genes involving RNA translation as well as mitochondrial respiration function, providing potential explanations for previous observations of mitochondrial dysfunction in similar T1D cohorts. Our novel findings indicate that skeletal muscle from physically active, young adults with moderately controlled T1D may have a reduced ability to handle, and repair from, damaging exercise. While larger cohort studies are clearly needed, these results suggest that those with T1D may require longer recovery times following damaging exercise.

Project description:Background:The transition of young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) from pediatric to adult care is challenging and frequently accompanied by worsening of diabetes-related health. To date, there are no reports which prospectively assess the effects of theory-based psycho-behavioral interventions during the transition period neither on glycemic control nor on psychosocial factors that contribute to poor glycemic control. Therefore, the overall aim of this study was to develop and pilot test an integrative group intervention based on the underlying principles of self-determination theory (SDT), in young adults with T1D. Methods:Fifty-one young adults with T1D participated in an education and case management-based transition program, of which 9 took part in the Diabetes Empowerment Council (DEC), a 12-week holistic, multimodality facilitated group intervention consisting of "council" process based on indigenous community practices, stress-reduction guided imagery, narrative medicine modalities, simple ritual, and other integrative modalities. Feasibility, acceptability, potential mechanism of effects, and bio-behavioral outcomes were determined using mixed qualitative and quantitative methods. Results:The intervention was highly acceptable to participants, though presented significant feasibility challenges. Participants in DEC showed significant reductions in perceived stress and depression, and increases in general well-being relative to other control participants. Reduction in perceived stress, independent of intervention group, was associated with reductions in hemoglobin A1C. A theoretical model explaining the effects of the intervention included the promotion of relatedness and autonomy support, 2 important aspects of SDT. Conclusions:The DEC is a promising group intervention for young adults with T1D going through transition to adult care. Future investigations will be necessary to resolve feasibility issues, optimize the multimodality intervention, determine full intervention effects, and fully test the role of the underlying theoretical model of action.ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number NCT02807155; Registration date: June 15, 2016 (retrospectively registered).

Project description:OBJECTIVE:With rising obesity, it is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish between type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in young adults. There has been substantial recent progress in identifying the contribution of common genetic variants to T1D and T2D. We aimed to determine whether a score generated from common genetic variants could be used to discriminate between T1D and T2D and also to predict severe insulin deficiency in young adults with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:We developed genetic risk scores (GRSs) from published T1D- and T2D-associated variants. We first tested whether the scores could distinguish clinically defined T1D and T2D from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) (n = 3,887). We then assessed whether the T1D GRS correctly classified young adults (diagnosed at 20-40 years of age, the age-group with the most diagnostic difficulty in clinical practice; n = 223) who progressed to severe insulin deficiency <3 years from diagnosis. RESULTS:In the WTCCC, the T1D GRS, based on 30 T1D-associated risk variants, was highly discriminative of T1D and T2D (area under the curve [AUC] 0.88 [95% CI 0.87-0.89]; P < 0.0001), and the T2D GRS added little discrimination (AUC 0.89). A T1D GRS >0.280 (>50th centile in those with T1D) is indicative of T1D (50% sensitivity, 95% specificity). A low T1D GRS (<0.234, <5th centile T1D) is indicative of T2D (53% sensitivity, 95% specificity). Most discriminative ability was obtained from just nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (AUC 0.87). In young adults with diabetes, T1D GRS alone predicted progression to insulin deficiency (AUC 0.87 [95% CI 0.82-0.92]; P < 0.0001). T1D GRS, autoantibody status, and clinical features were independent and additive predictors of severe insulin deficiency (combined AUC 0.96 [95% CI 0.94-0.99]; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:A T1D GRS can accurately identify young adults with diabetes who will require insulin treatment. This will be an important addition to correctly classifying individuals with diabetes when clinical features and autoimmune markers are equivocal.