Dataset Information

BRAF mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

BRAF mutations have been well described in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for several years, but the clinical features of patients harboring BRAF mutations are still not well described. We performed a meta-analysis to identify common clinical features in NSCLC patients carrying BRAF mutations.

Methods

We identified clinical studies that examined the association between BRAF mutations and features of NSCLC within PubMed, Embase and ISI Science Citation Index database up to October 2013. The effect size of clinical features was estimated by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study, using a fixed-effects or random-effects model.

Results

Ten studies with a total of 5599 NSCLC patients were included. There was a 3% (170/5599) BRAF mutation rate. BRAF mutations in NSCLC were significantly associated with adenocarcinomas (ADCs) (compared with non-ADCs, OR?=?4.96, 95%CI?=?2.29-10.75). There were no significant differences in gender, smoking and stage in patients with and without BRAF mutations. The BRAFV600E mutation was more frequent in women than non-BRAFV600E mutations (OR?=?0.27, 95%CI?=?0.12-0.59), and was closely related to never smokers (OR?=?0.14, 95%CI?=?0.05-0.42).

Conclusions

These findings have important implications for the prediction of the NSCLC sub-types more accurately combined with other genetic changes.

SUBMITTER: Chen D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4076330 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

BRAF mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen Dong D Zhang Li-Qun LQ Huang Jun-Fu JF Liu Kai K Chuai Zheng-Ran ZR Yang Zhao Z Wang Yun-Xia YX Shi Da-Chuan DC Liu Qian Q Huang Qing Q Fu Wei-Ling WL

PloS one 20140630 6

<h4>Background</h4>BRAF mutations have been well described in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for several years, but the clinical features of patients harboring BRAF mutations are still not well described. We performed a meta-analysis to identify common clinical features in NSCLC patients carrying BRAF mutations.<h4>Methods</h4>We identified clinical studies that examined the association between BRAF mutations and features of NSCLC within PubMed, Embase and ISI Science Citation Index database ...[more]

PMID: 24979348

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and BRAF are 2 driver genes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which are normally mutually exclusive. It has been previously reported that the existence of BRAF V600E in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients could cause resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but the influence of other BRAF actionable mutations on resistance to EGFR-TKIs has not yet been investigated. Understanding the coexistence of EGFR and BRAF actionable mutations in Chinese NSCLC patients may be essential for further treatment and prognostic prediction.MethodsA total of 127 Chinese NSCLC patients harboring EGFR and BRAF co-mutations were enrolled in this study. We analyzed the mutation profiles of these patients through next-generation sequencing (NGS). We explored the associations between somatic mutations and patient characteristics, including tumor stage and age, among others.ResultsThe frequency of EGFR and BRAF co-mutation was 0.91% in Chinese NSCLC patients, compared with 0.97% in Western NSCLC patients (cBioPortal). Among the 127 patients with both EGFR and BRAF mutations, 93 of them harbored clinically significant mutations. The remaining 34 patients were found to have mutations of uncertain significance of either EGFR or BRAF. TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene in BRAF and EGFR co-mutation patients, accounting for around 58% (N=54/93). MET active mutations (amplification and exon 14 skipping) accounted for 12% (N=11/93). Approximately 18% of patients (N=17/93) with significant EGFR mutations were detected to have fusions/rearrangements of the BRAF gene. BRAF fusion was more likely detected in EGFR exon19del patients compared with non-exon19del patients (P value =0.015). In addition, EGFR T790M, the most TKI-resistant mutation, was not found in any patient with BRAF fusion/rearrangement.ConclusionsThis study is the first to show different subtypes of EGFR and BRAF co-mutations in Chinese NSCLC patients. The prognosis of EGFR-TKI treatment may vary according to different BRAF actionable mutations. Aside from BRAF V600E, class II/III and BRAF fusions were found, which provides clues for investigating the resistance mechanisms of EGFR-TKIs in the future.

Project description:BACKGROUND:We sought to assess the relative effects of individual anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS:We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and grey literature (July 23, 2019) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included participants with ALK- or ROS1-positive NSCLC who received any ALK inhibitor compared with placebo, another ALK inhibitor, or the same ALK inhibitor at a different dose. The primary outcome was treatment-related death. Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and serious adverse events. Data were pooled via meta-analysis and network meta-analysis, and risk of bias was assessed. PROSPERO: CRD42017077046. RESULTS:Thirteen RCTs reporting outcomes of interest among participants with ALK-positive NSCLC were identified. Treatment-related deaths were rare, with 10 deaths attributed to crizotinib (risk difference v. chemotherapy: 0.49, 95% credible interval [CrI] -0.16 to 1.46; odds ratio 2.58 (0.76-11.37). All ALK inhibitors improved PSF relative to chemotherapy (hazard ratio [95% CrI]: crizotinib 0.46 [0.39-0.54]; ceritinib 0.52 [0.42-0.64]; alectinib 300 BID 0.16 [0.08-0.33]; alectinib 600 BID 0.23 [0.17-0.30]; brigatinib 0.23 [0.15-0.35]), while alectinib and brigatinib improved PFS over crizotinib and ceritinib (alectinib v. crizotinib 0.34 [0.17-0.70]; alectinib v. ceritinib 0.30 [0.14-0.64]; brigatinib v. crizotinib 0.49 [0.33-0.73]; brigatinib v. ceritinib 0.43 [0.27-0.70]). OS was improved with alectinib compared with chemotherapy (HR 0.57 [95% CrI 0.39-0.83]) and crizotinib (0.68 [0.48-0.96]). Use of crizotinib (odds ratio 2.08 [95% CrI 1.56-2.79]) and alectinib (1.60 [1.00-2.58]) but not ceritinib (1.25 [0.90-1.74), increased the risk of serious adverse events compared with chemotherapy. Results were generally consistent among treatment-experienced or naïve participants. CONCLUSION(S):Treatment-related deaths were infrequent among ALK-positive NSCLC. PFS may be improved by alectinib and brigatinib relative to other ALK inhibitors; however, the assessment of OS is likely confounded by treatment crossover and should be interpreted with caution.

Dataset Information

BRAF mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

BRAF mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets