Dataset Information

Expression and function of the progesterone receptor in human prostate stroma provide novel insights to cell proliferation control.

ABSTRACT: Like other tissues, the prostate is an admixture of many different cell types that can be segregated into components of the epithelium or stroma. Reciprocal interactions between these 2 types of cells are critical for maintaining prostate homeostasis, whereas aberrant stromal cell proliferation can disrupt this balance and result in diseases such as benign prostatic hyperplasia. Although the androgen and estrogen receptors are relatively well studied for their functions in controlling stromal cell proliferation and differentiation, the role of the progesterone receptor (PR) remains unclear.The aim of the study was to investigate the expression and function of the PR in the prostate.Human prostate biopsies, renal capsule xenografts, and prostate stromal cells were used. Immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, real-time quantitative PCR, cell proliferation, flow cytometry, and gene microarray analyses were performed.Two PR isoforms, PRA and PRB, are expressed in prostate stromal fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, but not in epithelial cells. Both PR isoforms suppress prostate stromal cell proliferation through inhibition of the expression of cyclinA, cyclinB, and cdc25c, thus delaying cell cycling through S and M phases. Gene microarray analyses further demonstrated that PRA and PRB regulated different transcriptomes. However, one of the major gene groups commonly regulated by both PR isoforms was the one associated with regulation of cell proliferation.PR plays an inhibitory role in prostate stromal cell proliferation.

SUBMITTER: Yu Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4078099 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Expression and function of the progesterone receptor in human prostate stroma provide novel insights to cell proliferation control.

Yu Yue Y Liu Liangliang L Xie Ning N Xue Hui H Fazli Ladan L Buttyan Ralph R Wang Yuzhuo Y Gleave Martin M Dong Xuesen X

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 20130510 7

<h4>Context</h4>Like other tissues, the prostate is an admixture of many different cell types that can be segregated into components of the epithelium or stroma. Reciprocal interactions between these 2 types of cells are critical for maintaining prostate homeostasis, whereas aberrant stromal cell proliferation can disrupt this balance and result in diseases such as benign prostatic hyperplasia. Although the androgen and estrogen receptors are relatively well studied for their functions in contro ...[more]

PMID: 23666965

Similar Datasets

Project description:Simple Summary Most breast cancers co-express estrogen receptor α (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PgR). These cancers are sensitive to endocrine therapy and, in general, have superior outcomes. However, a subset of tumors expresses ERα but loses expression of PgR in various mechanisms. The processes driving the loss of PgR may cause resistance to hormonal treatment and a more aggressive clinical course. The current review summarizes current knowledge on the biology of ERα-positive PgR(−)negative breast cancer and discusses the associations between molecular mechanisms and clinical characteristics. Abstract Estrogen receptor α (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PgR) are crucial prognostic and predictive biomarkers that are usually co-expressed in breast cancer (BC). However, 12–24% of BCs present ERα(+)/PgR(−) phenotype at immunohistochemical evaluation. In fact, BC may either show primary PgR(−) status (in chemonaïve tumor sample), lose PgR expression during neoadjuvant treatment, or acquire PgR(−) phenotype in local relapse or metastasis. The loss of PgR expression in ERα(+) breast cancer may signify resistance to endocrine therapy and poorer outcomes. On the other hand, ERα(+)/PgR(−) BCs may have a better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than double-positive tumors. Loss of PgR expression may be a result of pre-transcriptional alterations (copy number loss, mutation, epigenetic modifications), decreased transcription of the PGR gene (e.g., by microRNAs), and post-translational modifications (e.g., phosphorylation, sumoylation). Various processes involved in the down-regulation of PgR have distinct consequences on the biology of cancer cells. Occasionally, negative PgR status detected by immunohistochemical analysis is paradoxically associated with enhanced transcriptional activity of PgR that might be inhibited by antiprogestin treatment. Identification of the mechanism of PgR loss in each patient seems challenging, yet it may provide important information on the biology of the tumor and predict its responsiveness to the therapy.

Project description:BackgroundThe plant immune system employs intracellular NLRs (nucleotide binding [NB], leucine-rich repeat [LRR]/nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain [NOD]-like receptors) to detect effector proteins secreted into the plant cell by potential pathogens. Activated plant NLRs trigger a range of immune responses, collectively known as the hypersensitive response (HR), which culminates in death of the infected cell. Plant NLRs show structural and functional resemblance to animal NLRs involved in inflammatory and innate immune responses. Therefore, knowledge of the activation and regulation of animal NLRs can help us understand the mechanism of action of plant NLRs, and vice versa.ScopeThis review provides an overview of the innate immune pathways in plants and animals, focusing on the available structural and biochemical information available for both plant and animal NLRs. We highlight the gap in knowledge between the animal and plant systems, in particular the lack of structural information for plant NLRs, with crystal structures only available for the N-terminal domains of plant NLRs and an integrated decoy domain, in contrast to the more complete structures available for animal NLRs. We assess the similarities and differences between plant and animal NLRs, and use the structural information on the animal NLR pair NAIP/NLRC4 to derive a plausible model for plant NLR activation.ConclusionsSignalling by cooperative assembly formation (SCAF) appears to operate in most innate immunity pathways, including plant and animal NLRs. Our proposed model of plant NLR activation includes three key steps: (1) initially, the NLR exists in an inactive auto-inhibited state; (2) a combination of binding by activating elicitor and ATP leads to a structural rearrangement of the NLR; and (3) signalling occurs through cooperative assembly of the resistosome. Further studies, structural and biochemical in particular, will be required to provide additional evidence for the different features of this model and shed light on the many existing variations, e.g. helper NLRs and NLRs containing integrated decoys.

Dataset Information

Expression and function of the progesterone receptor in human prostate stroma provide novel insights to cell proliferation control.

Publications

Expression and function of the progesterone receptor in human prostate stroma provide novel insights to cell proliferation control.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets