Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Assessment of still and moving images in the diagnosis of gastric lesions using magnifying narrow-band imaging in a prospective multicenter trial.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: Magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) is more accurate than white-light imaging for diagnosing small gastric cancers. However, it is uncertain whether moving M-NBI images have additional effects in the diagnosis of gastric cancers compared with still images. DESIGN: A prospective multicenter cohort study. METHODS: To identify the additional benefits of moving M-NBI images by comparing the diagnostic accuracy of still images only with that of both still and moving images. Still and moving M-NBI images of 40 gastric lesions were obtained by an expert endoscopist prior to this prospective multicenter cohort study. Thirty-four endoscopists from ten different Japanese institutions participated in the prospective multicenter cohort study. Each study participant was first tested using only still M-NBI images (still image test), then tested 1 month later using both still and moving M-NBI images (moving image test). The main outcome was a difference in the diagnostic accuracy of cancerous versus noncancerous lesions between the still image test and the moving image test. RESULTS: Thirty-four endoscopists were analysed. There were no significant difference of cancerous versus noncancerous lesions between still and moving image tests in the diagnostic accuracy (59.9% versus 61.5%), sensitivity (53.4% versus 55.9%), and specificity (67.0% versus 67.6%). And there were no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy between still and moving image tests of demarcation line (65.4% versus 65.5%), microvascular pattern (56.7% versus 56.9%), and microsurface pattern (48.1% versus 50.9%). Diagnostic accuracy showed no significant difference between the still and moving image tests in the subgroups of endoscopic findings of the lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of moving M-NBI images to still M-NBI images does not improve the diagnostic accuracy for gastric lesions. It is reasonable to concentrate on taking sharp still M-NBI images during endoscopic observation and use them for diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Umin.ac.jp UMIN-CTR000008048.

SUBMITTER: Hayashi T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4079511 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Assessment of still and moving images in the diagnosis of gastric lesions using magnifying narrow-band imaging in a prospective multicenter trial.

Hayashi Tomoyuki T   Doyama Hisashi H   Shirota Yukihiro Y   Tsuji Hirokazu H   Marukawa Youhei Y   Ohta Hajime H   Miwa Kazuhiro K   Masunaga Takaharu T   Terasaki Shuichi S   Matano Yutaka Y   Tsuji Kunihiro K   Kaneko Yoshibumi Y   Okada Toshihide T   Kurumaya Hiroshi H   Kaneko Shuichi S  

PloS one 20140702 7


<h4>Objectives</h4>Magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) is more accurate than white-light imaging for diagnosing small gastric cancers. However, it is uncertain whether moving M-NBI images have additional effects in the diagnosis of gastric cancers compared with still images.<h4>Design</h4>A prospective multicenter cohort study.<h4>Methods</h4>To identify the additional benefits of moving M-NBI images by comparing the diagnostic accuracy of still images only with that of both still and moving  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8828242 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8035442 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4683127 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4391823 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8117737 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5542817 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5465184 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8634361 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7694180 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3990530 | biostudies-literature