Dataset Information

Semiparametric regression analysis for time-to-event marked endpoints in cancer studies.

ABSTRACT: In cancer studies the disease natural history process is often observed only at a fixed, random point of diagnosis (a survival time), leading to a current status observation (Sun (2006). The statistical analysis of interval-censored failure time data. Berlin: Springer.) representing a surrogate (a mark) (Jacobsen (2006). Point process theory and applications: marked point and piecewise deterministic processes. Basel: Birkhauser.) attached to the observed survival time. Examples include time to recurrence and stage (local vs. metastatic). We study a simple model that provides insights into the relationship between the observed marked endpoint and the latent disease natural history leading to it. A semiparametric regression model is developed to assess the covariate effects on the observed marked endpoint explained by a latent disease process. The proposed semiparametric regression model can be represented as a transformation model in terms of mark-specific hazards, induced by a process-based mixed effect. Large-sample properties of the proposed estimators are established. The methodology is illustrated by Monte Carlo simulation studies, and an application to a randomized clinical trial of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

SUBMITTER: Hu C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4102917 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundComposite time-to-event endpoints are beneficial for assessing related outcomes jointly in clinical trials, but components of the endpoint may have different censoring mechanisms. For example, in the PRagmatic EValuation of evENTs And Benefits of Lipid-lowering in oldEr adults (PREVENTABLE) trial, the composite outcome contains one endpoint that is right censored (all-cause mortality) and two endpoints that are interval censored (dementia and persistent disability). Although Cox regression is an established method for time-to-event outcomes, it is unclear how models perform under differing component-wise censoring schemes for large clinical trial data. The goal of this article is to conduct a simulation study to investigate the performance of Cox models under different scenarios for composite endpoints with component-wise censoring.MethodsWe simulated data by varying the strength and direction of the association between treatment and outcome for the two component types, the proportion of events arising from the components of the outcome (right censored and interval censored), and the method for including the interval-censored component in the Cox model (upper value and midpoint of the interval). Under these scenarios, we compared the treatment effect estimate bias, confidence interval coverage, and power.ResultsBased on the simulation study, Cox models generally have adequate power to achieve statistical significance for comparing treatments for composite outcomes with component-wise censoring. In our simulation study, we did not observe substantive bias for scenarios under the null hypothesis or when the treatment has a similar relative effect on each component outcome. Performance was similar regardless of if the upper value or midpoint of the interval-censored part of the composite outcome was used.ConclusionCox regression is a suitable method for analysis of clinical trial data with composite time-to-event endpoints subject to different component-wise censoring mechanisms.

Dataset Information

Semiparametric regression analysis for time-to-event marked endpoints in cancer studies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets