Dataset Information

Androgen receptor (AR) expression in 400 breast carcinomas: is routine AR assessment justified?

ABSTRACT:

Background

Triple negative breast carcinomas (TNBC) do not benefit from hormonal or Herceptin therapies. In search of novel therapeutic targets for TNBC, interest is escalating in a subset of these tumors that are androgen receptor (AR) positive with potential benefit from anti-androgen therapy. Against this background, the frequency of AR expression alone and in combination with other markers and morphologic features was assessed to identify TNBC subtypes for targeted therapy.

Methods

400 consecutive invasive mammary carcinomas with known estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR) and HER2 status were selected for study. The frequency of AR positivity alone or in combination with other markers was recorded with specific attention to the morphology of AR+ TNBCs. Ki67 was evaluated in selected group of cases. ASCO/CAP guidelines were used for interpretation of the various biomarkers.

Results

Of the 400 tumors, 32 (8%) carcinomas were quadruple negative (ER-, PR-, AR-, Her2-), while 50 tumors (12.5%) were triple negative (ER-, PR-, Her2-); 18 (36%) of the triple negative tumors were AR positive and 10 (55%) of these were classic apocrine carcinomas. Fourteen cases, all apocrine carcinomas, were AR and Her2 positive. All 32 QN carcinomas were poorly differentiated and they had the highest Ki67 labeling index.

Conclusion

The relatively high proportion of AR+ tumors (36%) among the 50 triple negative carcinomas is an important finding in support of routine assessment of AR in at least all TNBCs and apocrine carcinomas as a potential target for therapy.

SUBMITTER: Safarpour D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4106653 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Androgen receptor (AR) expression in 400 breast carcinomas: is routine AR assessment justified?

Safarpour Damoun D Pakneshan Shabnam S Tavassoli Fattaneh A FA

American journal of cancer research 20140716 4

<h4>Background</h4>Triple negative breast carcinomas (TNBC) do not benefit from hormonal or Herceptin therapies. In search of novel therapeutic targets for TNBC, interest is escalating in a subset of these tumors that are androgen receptor (AR) positive with potential benefit from anti-androgen therapy. Against this background, the frequency of AR expression alone and in combination with other markers and morphologic features was assessed to identify TNBC subtypes for targeted therapy.<h4>Method ...[more]

PMID: 25057438

Similar Datasets

Project description:Androgens control male sexual development and maintenance of the adult male phenotype. They have very divergent effects on their target organs like the reproductive organs, muscle, bone, brain and skin. This is explained in part by the fact that different cell types respond differently to androgen stimulus, even when all these responses are mediated by the same intracellular androgen receptor. To understand these tissue- and cell-specific readouts of androgens, we have to learn the many different steps in the transcription activation mechanisms of the androgen receptor (NR3C4). Like all nuclear receptors, the steroid receptors have a central DNA-binding domain connected to a ligand-binding domain by a hinge region. In addition, all steroid receptors have a relatively large amino-terminal domain. Despite the overall structural homology with other nuclear receptors, the androgen receptor has several specific characteristics which will be discussed here. This receptor can bind two types of androgen response elements (AREs): one type being similar to the classical GRE/PRE-type elements, the other type being the more divergent and more selective AREs. The hormone-binding domain has low intrinsic transactivation properties, a feature that correlates with the low affinity of this domain for the canonical LxxLL-bearing coactivators. For the androgen receptor, transcriptional activation involves the alternative recruitment of coactivators to different regions in the amino-terminal domain, as well as the hinge region. Finally, a very strong ligand-induced interaction between the amino-terminal domain and the ligand-binding domain of the androgen receptor seems to be involved in many aspects of its function as a transcription factor. This review describes the current knowledge on the structure-function relationships within the domains of the androgen receptor and tries to integrate the involvement of different domains, subdomains and motifs in the functioning of this receptor as a transcription factor with tissue- and cell-specific readouts.

Project description:BackgroundMolecular and immunohistochemistry-based profiling of prostatic adenocarcinoma has revealed frequent Androgen Receptor (AR) gene and protein alterations in metastatic disease. This includes an AR-null non-neuroendocrine phenotype of metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer which may be less sensitive to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. This AR-null non-neuroendocrine phenotype is thought to be associated with TP53 and RB1 alterations. Herein, we have correlated molecular profiling of metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer with AR/P53/RB immunohistochemistry and relevant clinical correlates.DesignTwenty-seven cases of metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer were evaluated using histopathologic examination to rule out neuroendocrine differentiation. A combination of a hybridization exon-capture next-generation sequencing-based assay (n = 26), fluorescence in situ hybridization for AR copy number status (n = 16), and immunohistochemistry for AR (n = 27), P53 (n = 24) and RB (n = 25) was used to profile these cases.ResultsOf 27 metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer cases, 17 had AR amplification and showed positive nuclear expression of AR by immunohistochemistry. Nine cases lacked AR copy number alterations using next-generation sequencing/fluorescence in situ hybridization. A subset of these metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer cases demonstrated the AR-null phenotype by immunohistochemistry (five cases and one additional case where next-generation sequencing failed). Common co-alterations in these cases involved the TP53, RB1, and PTEN genes and all these patients received prior therapy with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (abiraterone and/or enzalutamide).ConclusionsOur study suggests that AR immunohistochemistry may distinguish AR-null from AR-expressing cases in the metastatic setting. AR-null status informs clinical decision-making regarding continuation of therapy with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors and consideration of other treatment options. This might be a relevant and cost-effective diagnostic strategy when there is limited access and/or limited tumor material for molecular testing.

Dataset Information

Androgen receptor (AR) expression in 400 breast carcinomas: is routine AR assessment justified?

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Androgen receptor (AR) expression in 400 breast carcinomas: is routine AR assessment justified?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets