Dataset Information

Performance of creatinine-based GFR estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients.

ABSTRACT: Accurate assessment of kidney function is important for the management of solid-organ transplant recipients. In other clinical populations, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) most commonly is estimated using the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) creatinine or the 4-variable MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) Study equation. The accuracy of these equations compared with other GFR estimating equations in transplant recipients has not been carefully studied.Diagnostic test study.Solid-organ transplant recipients longer than 6 months posttransplantation from 5 clinical populations (N=3,622, including recipients of kidney [53%], liver [35%], and other or multiple organs [12%]).Estimated GFR (eGFR) using creatinine-based GFR estimating equations identified from a systematic review of the literature. Performance of the CKD-EPI creatinine and the MDRD Study equations was compared with alternative equations.Measured GFR (mGFR) from urinary clearance of iothalamate or plasma clearance of iohexol.Error (difference between mGFR and eGFR) expressed as P30 (proportion of absolute percent error <30%) and mean absolute error.We identified 26 GFR estimating equations. Mean mGFR was 55.1±22.7 (SD) mL/min/1.73 m(2). P30 and mean absolute error for the CKD-EPI and the MDRD Study equations were 78.9% (99.6% CI, 76.9%-80.8%) for both and 10.6 (99.6% CI, 10.1-11.1) versus 11.0 (99.6% CI, 10.5-11.5) mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively; these equations were more accurate than any of the alternative equations (P <0.001 for all pairwise comparisons for both measures). They performed better than or as well as the alternative equations in most subgroups defined by demographic and clinical characteristics, including type of transplanted organ.Study population included few nonwhites and people with solid-organ transplants other than liver and kidneys.The CKD-EPI creatinine and the MDRD Study equations perform better than the alternative creatinine-based estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients. They can be used for clinical management.

SUBMITTER: Shaffi K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4113340 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Performance of creatinine-based GFR estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Shaffi Kamran K Uhlig Katrin K Perrone Ronald D RD Ruthazer Robin R Rule Andrew A Lieske John C JC Navis Gerjan G Poggio Emilio D ED Inker Lesley A LA Levey Andrew S AS

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 20140402 6

<h4>Background</h4>Accurate assessment of kidney function is important for the management of solid-organ transplant recipients. In other clinical populations, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) most commonly is estimated using the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) creatinine or the 4-variable MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) Study equation. The accuracy of these equations compared with other GFR estimating equations in transplant recipients has not been carefu ...[more]

PMID: 24703720

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectiveseGFR equations have been evaluated in kidney transplant recipients with variable performance. We assessed the performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations on the basis of creatinine, cystatin C, and both (eGFR creatinine-cystatin C) compared with measured GFR by iothalamate clearance and evaluated their non-GFR determinants and associations across 15 cardiovascular risk factors.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsA cross-sectional cohort of 1139 kidney transplant recipients >1 year after transplant was analyzed. eGFR bias, precision, and accuracy (percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR) were assessed. Interaction of each cardiovascular risk factor with eGFR relative to measured GFR was determined.ResultsMedian measured GFR was 55.0 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). eGFR creatinine overestimated measured GFR by 3.1% (percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR of 80.4%), and eGFR Modification of Diet in Renal Disease underestimated measured GFR by 2.2% (percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR of 80.4%). eGFR cystatin C underestimated measured GFR by -13.7% (percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR of 77.1%), and eGFR creatinine-cystatin C underestimated measured GFR by -8.1% (percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR of 86.5%). Lower measured GFR associated with older age, women, obesity, longer time after transplant, lower HDL, lower hemoglobin, lower albumin, higher triglycerides, higher proteinuria, and an elevated cardiac troponin T level but did not associate with diabetes, smoking, cardiovascular events, pretransplant dialysis, or hemoglobin A1c. These risk factor associations differed for five risk factors with eGFR creatinine, six risk factors for eGFR Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, ten risk factors for eGFR cystatin C, and four risk factors for eGFR creatinine-cystatin C.ConclusionsThus, eGFR creatinine and eGFR creatinine-cystatin C are preferred over eGFR cystatin C in kidney transplant recipients because they are less biased, more accurate, and more consistently reflect the same risk factor associations seen with measured GFR.

Project description:Background and objectivesFormal evaluation of kidney function before and after hematopoietic cell transplant is important to determine conditioning regimens, type of transplant, and medication dosing. Serum creatinine and estimating equations may not accurately assess kidney function.Design, study, participants, & measurementsExisting estimating equations for GFR were compared with an iohexol measure of GFR in a prospective cohort study of 50 patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant and subsequent care at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute from 2009 to 2013. Patients underwent iohexol GFR, serum creatinine, and cystatin C determination at baseline and day 100 posthematopoietic cell transplant. Iohexol GFR measurements were compared with the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration, Inker CKD Epidemiology Collaboration cystatin C with and without serum creatinine, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, and Cockcroft-Gault estimating equations using Bland-Altman analysis and McNemar's test. The iohexol measurements were also compared with blood samples collected simultaneously on filter paper.ResultsMean differences between iohexol GFR and eGFR on the basis of Bland-Altman analyses ranged from -20.6 to +15.4 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) at baseline and -12.7 to +12.9 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) at day 100. The CKD Epidemiology Collaboration and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease estimating equations classified 64% of patients with a GFR<90 at baseline compared with 38% by iohexol GFR (P=0.003 and P<0.01, respectively). No statistically significant differences were seen at day 100. The filter paper GFR had a mean difference of 0 at baseline and 5.9 at day 100. Additionally, 21%-37% and 57%-89% of eGFRs were within 10% and 30%, respectively, of the iohexol GFR at baseline, and 16%-34% and 72%-84% were within 10% and 30%, respectively, of the iohexol GFR at day 100; 98% of the filter paper estimates at baseline were within 30%, and 46% were within 10% of iohexol GFR.ConclusionsThe estimating equations are neither accurate nor precise in the hematopoietic cell transplant population, and clinical decision may require measurement of GFR.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients [SOTRs] have elevated rates of certain rare cancers caused by viruses. Evaluating risk of rare cancers among SOTRs may provide etiological clues for additional cancers linked to poor immunity and viral infections. METHODS:We performed a cohort study of 262,455 SOTRs (1987-2014) from the US SOTR registry linked to 17 population-based cancer registries. First cancers in SOTRs were categorized using an established classification scheme based on site and histology. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) compared risk in SOTRs to the general population. We used Poisson regression to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) according to immune-related SOTR characteristics, including time since transplant (i.e., duration of immunosuppression). All statistical tests are two-sided. RESULTS:We examined 694 distinct cancer subtypes, with 33 manifesting statistically significantly elevated SIRs (Bonferroni p?<?7.2 x 10-5). All 33 are rare (incidence <6 per 100,000 person-years) and several have known viral etiology (e.g. Merkel cell carcinoma (SIR = 24.7, 95%CI = 20.8 to 29.1). Additional cancers that were increased include squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) of the lip (SIR range = 18.3-19.8), eye/adnexa (SIR = 13.8, 95%CI = 7.9 to 22.3), salivary gland (SIR = 9.3, 95%CI = 6.1 to 13.5), and nasal cavity/sinuses (SIR = 4.5, 95%CI = 2.8 to 6.8); sebaceous adenocarcinoma (SIR = 34.3, 95%CI = 26.3 to 44.0); malignant fibrous histiocytoma (15.4); and subtypes of bladder, kidney, lung, and colon cancer (SIR range = 3.2-13.3). Incidence of several cancers increased over time since transplant (ptrend<0.05), including SCCs of the lip, salivary gland, and anogenital sites. CONCLUSIONS:SOTRs experience elevated rates of several rare cancers. Because some of these cancers exhibit aggressive behavior with poor outcomes, it is important to further characterize the role of immunity and the potential involvement of oncogenic viruses to improve prevention and treatment.

Dataset Information

Performance of creatinine-based GFR estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Publications

Performance of creatinine-based GFR estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets