Dataset Information

A prediction model for 5-year cardiac mortality in patients with chronic heart failure using ¹²³I-metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Prediction of mortality risk is important in the management of chronic heart failure (CHF). The aim of this study was to create a prediction model for 5-year cardiac death including assessment of cardiac sympathetic innervation using data from a multicenter cohort study in Japan.

Methods

The original pooled database consisted of cohort studies from six sites in Japan. A total of 933 CHF patients who underwent (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging and whose 5-year outcomes were known were selected from this database. The late MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratio (HMR) was used for quantification of cardiac uptake. Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression analyses were used to select appropriate variables for predicting 5-year cardiac mortality. The formula for predicting 5-year mortality was created using a logistic regression model.

Results

During the 5-year follow-up, 205 patients (22 %) died of a cardiac event including heart failure death, sudden cardiac death and fatal acute myocardial infarction (64 %, 30 % and 6 %, respectively). Multivariate logistic analysis selected four parameters, including New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, age, gender and left ventricular ejection fraction, without HMR (model 1) and five parameters with the addition of HMR (model 2). The net reclassification improvement analysis for all subjects was 13.8 % (p < 0.0001) by including HMR and its inclusion was most effective in the downward reclassification of low-risk patients. Nomograms for predicting 5-year cardiac mortality were created from the five-parameter regression model.

Conclusion

Cardiac MIBG imaging had a significant additive value for predicting cardiac mortality. The prediction formula and nomograms can be used for risk stratifying in patients with CHF.

SUBMITTER: Nakajima K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4122818 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsIndividual risk stratification is a fundamental strategy in managing patients with heart failure (HF). Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning (ML), can develop superior models for predicting the prognosis of HF patients, and administrative claim data (ACD) are suitable for ML analysis because ACD is a structured database. The objective of this study was to analyse ACD using an ML algorithm, predict the 1 year mortality of patients with HF, and finally develop an easy-to-use prediction model with high accuracy using the top predictors identified by the ML algorithm.Methods and resultsMachine learning-based prognostic prediction models were developed from the ACD on 10 175 HF patients from the Japanese Registry of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with 17% mortality during 1 year follow-up. The top predictors for prognosis in HF were identified by the permutation feature importance technique, and an easy-to-use prediction model was developed based on these predictors. The c-statistics and Brier scores of the developed ML-based models were compared with those of conventional risk models: Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) and Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC). A voting classifier algorithm (ACD-VC) achieved the highest c-statistics among the six ML algorithms. The permutation feature importance technique enabled identification of the top predictors such as Barthel index, age, body mass index, duration of hospitalization, last hospitalization, renal disease, and non-loop diuretics use (feature importance values were 0.054, 0.025, 0.010, 0.005, 0.005, 0.004, and 0.004, respectively). Upon combination of some of the predictors that can be assessed from a brief interview, the Simple Model by ARTificial intelligence for HF risk stratification (SMART-HF) was established as an easy-to-use prediction model. Compared with the conventional models, SMART-HF achieved a higher c-statistic {ACD-VC: 0.777 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.751-0.803], SMART-HF: 0.765 [95% CI 0.739-0.791], SHFM: 0.713 [95% CI 0.684-0.742], MAGGIC: 0.726 [95% CI 0.698-0.753]} and better Brier scores (ACD-VC: 0.121, SMART-HF: 0.124, SHFM: 0.139, MAGGIC: 0.130).ConclusionsThe ML model based on ACD predicted the 1 year mortality of HF patients with high accuracy, and SMART-HF along with the ML model achieved superior performance to that of the conventional risk models. The SMART-HF model has the clear merit of easy operability even by non-healthcare providers with a user-friendly online interface (https://hfriskcalculator.herokuapp.com/). Risk models developed using SMART-HF may provide a novel modality for risk stratification of patients with HF.