Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Red fluorescence increases with depth in reef fishes, supporting a visual function, not UV protection.


ABSTRACT: Why do some marine fishes exhibit striking patterns of natural red fluorescence? In this study, we contrast two non-exclusive hypotheses: (i) that UV absorption by fluorescent pigments offers significant photoprotection in shallow water, where UV irradiance is strongest; and (ii) that red fluorescence enhances visual contrast at depths below -10 m, where most light in the 'red' 600-700 nm range has been absorbed. Whereas the photoprotection hypothesis predicts fluorescence to be stronger near the surface and weaker in deeper water, the visual contrast hypothesis predicts the opposite. We used fluorometry to measure red fluorescence brightness in vivo in individuals belonging to eight common small reef fish species with conspicuously red fluorescent eyes. Fluorescence was significantly brighter in specimens from the -20 m sites than in those from -5 m sites in six out of eight species. No difference was found in the remaining two. Our results support the visual contrast hypothesis. We discuss the possible roles fluorescence may play in fish visual ecology and highlight the possibility that fluorescent light emission from the eyes in particular may be used to detect cryptic prey.

SUBMITTER: Meadows MG 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4123709 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Red fluorescence increases with depth in reef fishes, supporting a visual function, not UV protection.

Meadows Melissa G MG   Anthes Nils N   Dangelmayer Sandra S   Alwany Magdy A MA   Gerlach Tobias T   Schulte Gregor G   Sprenger Dennis D   Theobald Jennifer J   Michiels Nico K NK  

Proceedings. Biological sciences 20140901 1790


Why do some marine fishes exhibit striking patterns of natural red fluorescence? In this study, we contrast two non-exclusive hypotheses: (i) that UV absorption by fluorescent pigments offers significant photoprotection in shallow water, where UV irradiance is strongest; and (ii) that red fluorescence enhances visual contrast at depths below -10 m, where most light in the 'red' 600-700 nm range has been absorbed. Whereas the photoprotection hypothesis predicts fluorescence to be stronger near th  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3963921 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3617182 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2567963 | biostudies-literature
| PRJNA747115 | ENA
| S-EPMC8947262 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10065935 | biostudies-literature
| PRJNA393758 | ENA
| S-EPMC3627313 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1564072 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6822765 | biostudies-literature