Dataset Information

Quantifying the role of adverse events in the mortality difference between first and second-generation antipsychotics in older adults: systematic review and meta-synthesis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Observational studies have reported higher mortality among older adults treated with first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) versus second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). A few studies examined risk for medical events, including stroke, ventricular arrhythmia, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and hip fracture.

Objectives

1) Review robust epidemiologic evidence comparing mortality and medical event risk between FGAs and SGAs in older adults; 2) Quantify how much these medical events explain the observed mortality difference between FGAs and SGAs.

Data sources

Pubmed and Science Citation Index.

Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions

Studies of antipsychotic users that: 1) evaluated mortality or medical events specified above; 2) restricted to populations with a mean age of 65 years or older 3) compared FGAs to SGAs, or both to a non-user group; (4) employed a "new user" design; (5) adjusted for confounders assessed prior to antipsychotic initiation; (6) and did not require survival after antipsychotic initiation. A separate search was performed for mortality estimates associated with the specified medical events.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods

For each medical event, we used a non-parametric model to estimate lower and upper bounds for the proportion of the mortality difference-comparing FGAs to SGAs-mediated by their difference in risk for the medical event.

Results

We provide a brief, updated summary of the included studies and the biological plausibility of these mechanisms. Of the 1122 unique citations retrieved, we reviewed 20 observational cohort studies that reported 28 associations. We identified hip fracture, stroke, myocardial infarction, and ventricular arrhythmias as potential intermediaries on the causal pathway from antipsychotic type to death. However, these events did not appear to explain the entire mortality difference.

Conclusions

The current literature suggests that hip fracture, stroke, myocardial infarction, and ventricular arrhythmias partially explain the mortality difference between SGAs and FGAs.

SUBMITTER: Jackson JW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4139353 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantifying the role of adverse events in the mortality difference between first and second-generation antipsychotics in older adults: systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Jackson John W JW Schneeweiss Sebastian S VanderWeele Tyler J TJ Blacker Deborah D

PloS one 20140820 8

<h4>Background</h4>Observational studies have reported higher mortality among older adults treated with first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) versus second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). A few studies examined risk for medical events, including stroke, ventricular arrhythmia, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and hip fracture.<h4>Objectives</h4>1) Review robust epidemiologic evidence comparing mortality and medical event risk between FGAs and SGAs in older adults; 2) ...[more]

PMID: 25140533

Similar Datasets

Project description:Few controlled trials compared second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) with first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) regarding relapse prevention in schizophrenia. We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis of randomized trials, lasting ?6 months comparing SGAs with FGAs in schizophrenia. Primary outcome was study-defined relapse; secondary outcomes included relapse at 3, 6 and 12 months; treatment failure; hospitalization; and dropout owing to any cause, non-adherence and intolerability. Pooled relative risk (RR) (±95% confidence intervals (CIs)) was calculated using random-effects model, with numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) calculations where appropriate. Across 23 studies (n=4504, mean duration=61.9±22.4 weeks), none of the individual SGAs outperformed FGAs (mainly haloperidol) regarding study-defined relapse, except for isolated, single trial-based superiority, and except for risperidone's superiority at 3 and 6 months when requiring ?3 trials. Grouped together, however, SGAs prevented relapse more than FGAs (29.0 versus 37.5%, RR=0.80, CI: 0.70-0.91, P=0.0007, I(2)=37%; NNT=17, CI: 10-50, P=0.003). SGAs were also superior regarding relapse at 3, 6 and 12 months (P=0.04, P<0.0001, P=0.0001), treatment failure (P=0.003) and hospitalization (P=0.004). SGAs showed trend-level superiority for dropout owing to intolerability (P=0.05). Superiority of SGAs regarding relapse was modest (NNT=17), but confirmed in double-blind trials, first- and multi-episode patients, using preferentially or exclusively raw or estimated relapse rates, and for different haloperidol equivalent comparator doses. There was no significant heterogeneity or publication bias. The relevance of the somewhat greater efficacy of SGAs over FGAs on several key outcomes depends on whether SGAs form a meaningful group and whether mid- or low-potency FGAs differ from haloperidol. Regardless, treatment selection needs to be individualized considering patient- and medication-related factors.

Project description:Psychotic disorders are characterized by significant deficits in attentional control, but the neurobiological mechanisms underlying these deficits early in the course of illness prior to extensive pharmacotherapy are not well understood. Moreover, little is known regarding the symptom and brain changes associated with amelioration of attentional impairments through antipsychotic pharmacotherapy. In this study 14 male patients experiencing a first-episode of psychosis with minimal prior antipsychotic treatment completed an attentional control task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging at the onset of treatment with a second generation antipsychotic (risperidone or aripiprazole) in a double blind randomized clinical trial and then again following approximately 12 weeks of treatment. In addition, 14 age-, and performance-matched healthy male volunteers who were not treated completed the same task at a baseline timepoint and then again following 12 weeks. Patients showed significantly greater activation than healthy volunteers in the right globus pallidus, left thalamus, and right thalamus at the time of the baseline scan. Among patients there was a significant reduction in right globus pallidus blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response following antipsychotic treatment that correlated significantly with improvement in response accuracy and reductions in thought disturbance. No changes in globus pallidus activation were observed in healthy volunteers over this time period. These preliminary findings suggest that improvement in attentional control and concomitant reductions in thought disturbance in first-episode psychosis may be associated with reductions in subcortical activity following administration of second-generation antipsychotics early in the course of illness. These findings have implications for understanding how changes in basal ganglia activity may be linked to improvements in attentional control through antipsychotics.

Project description:Because early treatment choice is critical in first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (FES), this meta-analysis compared efficacy and tolerability of individual second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) with first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) in FES. We conducted systematic literature search (until 12 December 2010) and meta-analysis of acute, randomized trials with ?1 FGA vs. SGA comparison; patients in their first episode of psychosis and diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders; available data for psychopathology change, treatment response, treatment discontinuation, adverse effects, or cognition. Across 13 trials (n = 2509), olanzapine (seven trials) and amisulpride (one trial) outperformed FGAs (haloperidol: 9/13 trials) in 9/13 and 8/13 efficacy outcomes, respectively, risperidone (eight trials) in 4/13, quetiapine (one trial) in 3/13 and clozapine (two trials) and ziprasidone (one trial) in 1/13, each. Compared to FGAs, extrapyramidal symptom (EPS)-related outcomes were less frequent with olanzapine, risperidone and clozapine, but weight gain was greater with clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone. Pooled SGAs were similar to FGAs regarding total psychopathology change, depression, treatment response and metabolic changes. SGAs significantly outperformed FGAs regarding lower treatment discontinuation, irrespective of cause, negative symptoms, global cognition and less EPS and akathisia, while SGAs increased weight more (p < 0.05-0.01). Results were not affected by FGA dose or publication bias, but industry-sponsored studies favoured SGAs more than federally funded studies. To summarize, in FES, olanzapine, amisulpride and, less so, risperidone and quetiapine showed superior efficacy, greater treatment persistence and less EPS than FGAs. However, weight increase with olanzapine, risperidone and clozapine and metabolic changes with olanzapine were greater. Additional FES studies including broader-based SGAs and FGAs are needed.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious studies have reported an increased risk of stroke in patients taking antipsychotics. However, most of these studies have been conducted in the elderly population.ObjectiveWe estimated stroke risk in new users of any first-generation antipsychotic or haloperidol, vs second-generation antipsychotics among patients aged 18-64 years without a recent dementia diagnosis and, separately, regardless of a recent dementia diagnosis.MethodsData were obtained from IBM MarketScan® Commercial Database (1 January, 2001-31 December, 2017). Among new users without a recent dementia diagnosis, stroke risk for first-generation antipsychotics (FGAw/oD cohort) or haloperidol (HALw/oD cohort) was compared with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAw/oD cohort). A similar comparison was conducted among new users regardless of dementia diagnosis: first-generation antipsychotics (FGA cohort) or haloperidol (HAL cohort) vs second-generation antipsychotics (SGA cohort). Crude incident stroke rates within each cohort were determined. For hazard ratios, three propensity score matching strategies were used: unadjusted (crude), Sentinel propensity score strategy, and large-scale regularized regression model (adapted propensity score strategy).ResultsEach cohort included ≥12,000 patients. The incident rates for stroke per 1000 person-years were 3.10 (FGAw/oD), 5.99 (HALw/oD), 0.85 (SGAw/oD), 3.14 (FGA), 6.12 (HAL), and 0.90 (SGA). Pre-planned analysis with adapted propensity score strategy matching yielded calibrated hazard ratios for stroke: FGAw/oD vs SGAw/oD: 2.05 (calibrated confidence interval 1.13-3.89); HALw/oD vs SGAw/oD: 2.47 (1.14-5.48), FGA vs SGA: 1.64 (0.94-2.97), and HAL vs SGA: 1.98 (0.99-4.00). A post-hoc sensitivity analysis to address potential bias introduced by the 2015 change from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision yielded calibrated hazard ratios for FGAw/oD vs SGAw/oD: 1.59 (0.87-3.01), HALw/oD vs SGAw/oD: 2.79 (1.24-6.42), FGA vs SGA: 1.41 (0.79-2.62), and HAL vs SGA: 3.47 (1.63-7.92).ConclusionsAmong adults aged ≤64 years, without a recent dementia diagnosis, stroke risk is higher among those exposed to haloperidol compared with those exposed to second-generation antipsychotics.

Project description:IntroductionSecond-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are widely used in the paediatric population. It is currently established that SGAs may induce metabolic adverse events (AEs) such as weight gain, perturbation of blood lipids or glucose with risk of potential cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The Canadian Alliance for Monitoring Effectiveness and Safety of Antipsychotics in children (CAMESA) has published recommendations for monitoring the metabolic AEs of SGAs. Factors that may be associated with the onset of SGA's metabolic AEs and long-term consequences are less studied in the literature. The objectives of our research are to evaluate some factors that can influence the development of the SGA's metabolic AEs and to study clinical adherence to CAMESA guidelines.Methods and analysisThe Monitoring des Effets Métaboliques des Antipsychotiques de Seconde Génération study is a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal observational study with repeated measures of metabolic monitoring over 24 months. Two recruiting centres have been selected for patients under 18 years of age, previously naive of antipsychotics, starting an SGA or who have started an SGA for less than 4 weeks regardless of the diagnosis that motivated the prescription. Assessments are performed for anthropometric measures, blood pressure, blood tests at baseline and 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months of follow-up.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol was approved by the CHU Sainte-Justine's Research Ethics Board (MP-21-2016-1201) in 2016 and obtained institutional suitability for the 'Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal' Research Center in May 2018. For all participants, written consent will be obtained from parents/caregivers as well as the participant's assent in order to enable their participation in this research project. The results of this research will be published.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT04395326).

Dataset Information

Quantifying the role of adverse events in the mortality difference between first and second-generation antipsychotics in older adults: systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Background

Objectives

Data sources

Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions

Study appraisal and synthesis methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Quantifying the role of adverse events in the mortality difference between first and second-generation antipsychotics in older adults: systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets