Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To examine the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and type 2 diabetes using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2010-2012.Design
A pooled sample cross-sectional study.Setting
A nationally representative population survey data.Participants
A total of 14,330 individuals who participated in the KNHANES 2010-2012 were included in our analysis.Primary outcome
Prevalence of type 2 diabetes.Results
The relationship between SES and type 2 diabetes was assessed using logistic regression after adjusting for covariates including age, gender, marital status, region, body mass index, physical activity, smoking and high-risk drinking behaviour. After adjustment for covariates, our results indicated that individuals with the lowest income were more likely to have type 2 diabetes than those with the highest income (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.72). In addition, lower educational attainment was an independent factor for a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Korea.Conclusions
These findings suggest the need for developing a health policy to ameliorate socioeconomic inequalities, in particular income and education-related disparities in type 2 diabetes, along with risk factors at the individual level. In addition, future investigations of type 2 diabetes among Koreans should pay more attention to the social determinants of diabetes in order to understand the various causes of the condition.
SUBMITTER: Hwang J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4139629 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Hwang Jongnam J Shon Changwoo C
BMJ open 20140819 8
<h4>Objective</h4>To examine the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and type 2 diabetes using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2010-2012.<h4>Design</h4>A pooled sample cross-sectional study.<h4>Setting</h4>A nationally representative population survey data.<h4>Participants</h4>A total of 14,330 individuals who participated in the KNHANES 2010-2012 were included in our analysis.<h4>Primary outcome</h4>Prevalence of type 2 diabetes.<h4>Results</h4>T ...[more]