Dataset Information

Validation of a novel procedure for quantification of the formation of phosphoramide mustard by individuals treated with cyclophosphamide.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Use of the patient's body surface area (mg m(-2)) as a basis for dosing does not take individual variation in metabolic capacity and rate of clearance into account. Here, we evaluated a novel approach for individual monitoring of short-lived cytotoxic agents formed from cytostatic drugs such as cyclophosphamide (CP).

Methods

The accumulated blood dose of the cytotoxic active agent phosphoramide mustard (PAM) formed from CP was measured as a reaction product with hemoglobin (Hb adduct). This adduct, N-[2-(2-oxazolidonyl)ethyl]-valyl Hb (OzVal-Hb), was detached from Hb with the adduct FIRE procedure™, and the formed analyte was quantified using LC-MS/MS. This dose biomarker for PAM and the analytical procedure was evaluated in accordance with the guidelines on bioanalytical method validation formulated by the European Medicine Agency. The evaluated method was applied to quantify blood dose levels of PAM in female breast cancer patients (n = 12) before and after three cycles of polychemotherapy regimes containing CP.

Results

OzVal-Hb, a specific and stable biomarker, could be measured with great sensitivity (lower limit of quantification = 33 pmol g(-1) Hb), high accuracy (within ±20 %) and good repeatability (CV < 20 %). The inter-individual variability in the blood level of this adduct in women with breast cancer (n = 12) who received three doses of CP in combination with one or two other cytostatic drugs was 250 % following the first dose and approximately 150 % after each subsequent dose.

Conclusions

Measurement of the biomarker OzVal-Hb can be used to quantify the short-lived cytotoxic agent PAM in a single blood sample drawn several days after therapy. This procedure may aid in individualizing doses of CP, thereby improving efficacy while both reducing the risk of and increasing the predictability of side-effects.

SUBMITTER: von Stedingk H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4143677 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The reference standard for spatial normalization of brain positron emission tomography (PET) images involves structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. However, the lack of such structural information is fairly common in clinical settings. This might lead to lack of proper image quantification and to evaluation based only on visual ratings, which does not allow research studies or clinical trials based on quantification. PET/CT systems are widely available and CT normalization procedures need to be explored. Here we describe and validate a procedure for the spatial normalization of PET images based on the low-dose Computed Tomography (CT) images contextually acquired for attenuation correction in PET/CT systems. We included N?=?34 subjects, spanning from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment and dementia, who underwent amyloid-PET/CT (18F-Florbetaben) and structural MRI scans. The proposed pipeline is based on the SPM12 unified segmentation algorithm applied to low-dose CT images. The validation of the normalization pipeline focused on 1) statistical comparisons between regional and global 18F-Florbetaben-PET/CT standardized uptake value ratios (SUVrs) estimated from both CT-based and MRI-based normalized PET images (SUVrCT, SUVrMRI) and 2) estimation of the degrees of overlap between warped gray matter (GM) segmented maps derived from CT- and MRI-based spatial transformations. We found negligible deviations between regional and global SUVrs in the two CT and MRI-based methods. SUVrCT and SUVrMRI global uptake scores showed negligible differences (mean?±?sd 0.01?±?0.03). Notably, the CT- and MRI-based warped GM maps showed excellent overlap (90% within 1?mm). The proposed analysis pipeline, based on low-dose CT images, allows accurate spatial normalization and subsequent PET image quantification. A CT-based analytical pipeline could benefit both research and clinical practice, allowing the recruitment of larger samples and favoring clinical routine analysis.