Dataset Information

One size does not fit all: why universal decolonization strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in adult intensive care units may be inappropriate for neonatal intensive care units.

ABSTRACT: The REDUCE MRSA Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Decolonization vs Universal Clearance to Eliminate Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus), a large multicenter, randomized controlled trial in adult intensive care units (ICUs), found universal decolonization to be more effective than surveillance and isolation procedures with or without targeted decolonization for reducing rates of MRSA-positive clinical cultures. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention subsequently published protocols for implementing universal decolonization in ICUs based on the trial's methods. Caution should be exercised before widely adopting these procedures in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), particularly strategies that involve bathing with chlorhexidine and mupirocin application due to the potential for adverse events in their unique patient population, especially preterm infants. Large multicenter trials in the NICUs are needed to evaluate the efficacy, short- and long-term safety, and cost effectiveness of these strategies prior to their widespread implementation.

SUBMITTER: Nelson MU

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4152419 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

One size does not fit all: why universal decolonization strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in adult intensive care units may be inappropriate for neonatal intensive care units.

Nelson M U MU Bizzarro M J MJ Dembry L M LM Baltimore R S RS Gallagher P G PG

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association 20140710 9

The REDUCE MRSA Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Decolonization vs Universal Clearance to Eliminate Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus), a large multicenter, randomized controlled trial in adult intensive care units (ICUs), found universal decolonization to be more effective than surveillance and isolation procedures with or without targeted decolonization for reducing rates of MRSA-positive clinical cultures. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Centers for Disease Con ...[more]

PMID: 25010223

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceChlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and mupirocin are widely used to decolonize patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and reduce risks associated with infection in hospitalized populations. Quantifying the association of an application of CHG alone or in combination with mupirocin with risk of MRSA infection is important for studies evaluating alternative decolonization strategies or schedules and for identifying whether there is room for improved decolonizing agents.ObjectiveTo estimate the proportion of patients with MRSA decolonized per application of CHG and mupirocin from existing population-level studies.Design, setting, and participantsA stochastic mathematical model of an 18-bed intensive care unit (ICU) in an academic medical center operating over 1 year was used to estimate parameters for the proportion of simulated patients with MRSA decolonized per application of CHG and mupirocin. The model was conducted using approximate bayesian computation with data from an existing meta-analysis of studies conducted from February 2005 through January 2015. Data were analyzed from January 2018 through November 2019.ExposureA universal decolonization protocol for colonized patients in the ICU using CHG or CHG and mupirocin in combination was simulated.Main outcomes and measuresThe proportion of patients with MRSA decolonized per application of CHG and mupirocin was estimated.ResultsThe estimated proportion of patients with MRSA decolonized per application of CHG was 0.15 (95% credible interval, 0.01-0.42), and the estimated proportion per application of mupirocin in conjunction with CHG was 0.15 (95% credible interval, 0.01-0.54). A lag in colonization detection was associated with decreases in the CHG estimate (0.11; 95% credible interval, 0.01-0.30) and mupirocin estimate (0.10; 95% credible interval, 0.00-0.34), which were sensitive to the value of the modeled contact rate between nurses and patients. A 1% increase in the value of this parameter was associated with a 0.73% increase in the estimated combined outcomes associated with CHG and mupirocin (95% CI: 0.71, 0.75). Gaps longer than 24 hours in the administration of decolonizing agents were associated with a decrease of within-ICU MRSA transmission. Compared with a mean (SD) of 1.23 (0.27) acquisitions per 1000 patient-days in scenarios with no decolonizing bathing, a bathing protocol administering CHG and mupirocin every 120 hours was associated with a mean (SD) acquisition rate of 1.03 (0.24) acquisitions per 1000 patient days, a 16.3% decrease (95% CI, 14.7%-18.0%; P > .001).Conclusions and relevanceThese findings suggest that there may be room for significant improvement in anti-MRSA disinfectants, including the compounds themselves and their delivery mechanisms. Despite the decolonization estimates found in this study, these agents are associated with robust outcomes after delays in administration, which may help in alleviating concerns over patient comfort and toxic effects.

Project description:BackgroundBoth targeted decolonization and universal decolonization of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are candidate strategies to prevent health care-associated infections, particularly those caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).MethodsWe conducted a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial. Hospitals were randomly assigned to one of three strategies, with all adult ICUs in a given hospital assigned to the same strategy. Group 1 implemented MRSA screening and isolation; group 2, targeted decolonization (i.e., screening, isolation, and decolonization of MRSA carriers); and group 3, universal decolonization (i.e., no screening, and decolonization of all patients). Proportional-hazards models were used to assess differences in infection reductions across the study groups, with clustering according to hospital.ResultsA total of 43 hospitals (including 74 ICUs and 74,256 patients during the intervention period) underwent randomization. In the intervention period versus the baseline period, modeled hazard ratios for MRSA clinical isolates were 0.92 for screening and isolation (crude rate, 3.2 vs. 3.4 isolates per 1000 days), 0.75 for targeted decolonization (3.2 vs. 4.3 isolates per 1000 days), and 0.63 for universal decolonization (2.1 vs. 3.4 isolates per 1000 days) (P=0.01 for test of all groups being equal). In the intervention versus baseline periods, hazard ratios for bloodstream infection with any pathogen in the three groups were 0.99 (crude rate, 4.1 vs. 4.2 infections per 1000 days), 0.78 (3.7 vs. 4.8 infections per 1000 days), and 0.56 (3.6 vs. 6.1 infections per 1000 days), respectively (P<0.001 for test of all groups being equal). Universal decolonization resulted in a significantly greater reduction in the rate of all bloodstream infections than either targeted decolonization or screening and isolation. One bloodstream infection was prevented per 54 patients who underwent decolonization. The reductions in rates of MRSA bloodstream infection were similar to those of all bloodstream infections, but the difference was not significant. Adverse events, which occurred in 7 patients, were mild and related to chlorhexidine.ConclusionsIn routine ICU practice, universal decolonization was more effective than targeted decolonization or screening and isolation in reducing rates of MRSA clinical isolates and bloodstream infection from any pathogen. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; REDUCE MRSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00980980).

Project description:Decolonization with topical antibiotics is necessary to control outbreaks of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), but can trigger bacterial resistance. The objective of this study was to determine whether skin-to-skin contact of newborns colonized with Methicillin-Oxacillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Methicillin-Oxacillin-Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA/MRSE) with their mothers could be an effective alternative to promote bacterial decolonization of newborns' nostrils.We performed a randomized clinical trial with 102 newborns admitted to the NICU in three hospitals in São Luís, Brazil. Inclusion criteria were birth weight of 1300 to 1800 g, more than 4 days of hospitalization, newborns with positive nostril cultures for MRSA and/or multidrug-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and mothers not colonized by these bacteria. We used a random number algorithm for randomization. Allocation was performed using sealed opaque envelopes. Skin-to-skin contact was given twice a day for 60 minutes for seven consecutive days. The control group received routine care without skin-to-skin contact. There was no masking of newborn's mothers or researchers but the individuals who carried out bacterial cultures and assessed results were kept blind to group allocation. The primary outcome was colonization status of newborns' nostrils after 7 days of intervention. The directional hypothesis was that more newborns who receive skin-to-skin holding 2 hours/day for 7 days than newborns who receive normal care will be decolonized.Decolonization of MRSA/MRSE was greater in the intervention group (Risk Ratio?=?2.27; 95% CI 1.27-4.07, p-value?=?0.003). Number Needed to Treat (NNT) was 4.0 (95% CI 2.2 - 9.4). After adjustment for the possible confounding effects of small for gestational age birth, antibiotic use, need for resuscitation, sex and cesarean delivery, skin-to-skin contact remained strongly associated with decolonization of newborns' nostrils from MRSA/MRSE bacteria (p?=?0.007). There was no need to interrupt the trial for safety reasons.Skin-to-skin contact might be an effective and safe method for promoting decolonization of newborns' nostrils colonized by MRSA/MRSE.The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01498133 , November 21, 2011).

Project description:ImportanceStaphylococcus aureus is one of the leading causes of infections in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Most studies in this patient group focus on methicillin-resistant S aureus or the outbreak setting, whereas data for methicillin-susceptible S aureus are limited.ObjectivesTo identify risk factors for S aureus colonization and infections in hospitalized newborns and to investigate S aureus transmission and its dynamics in a nonoutbreak setting.Design, setting, and participantsThis monocentric cohort study in a tertiary NICU in Heidelberg, Germany, enrolled all hospitalized neonates (n = 590) with at least 1 nasal screening swab positive for S aureus. Data were collected from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019.ExposuresWeekly screening for S aureus colonization was performed for all newborns until discharge.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was any S aureus infection until hospital discharge. Transmission of S aureus and performance of routine typing to detect transmissions were defined as the secondary outcomes of the study.ResultsIn total, 590 newborns were enrolled (276 [46.8%] female and 314 [53.2%] male; 220 [37.3%] with birthweight <1500 g; 477 [80.8%] preterm; 449 [76.1%] singletons; 419 [71.5%] delivered via cesarean section). The median length of stay was 26 (range, 10-62) days. Overall, 135 infants (22.9%) were colonized by S aureus at some time during their hospital stay. The median time to first detection was 17 (interquartile range, 11-37) days. The overall incidence of S aureus infection was 1.7% (10 of 590). Low birth weight (<1500 g [odds ratio, 9.3; 95% CI, 5.9-14.6; P < .001]) and longer hospital stay (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.9-2.7; P < .001) were associated with colonization. Nasal carriage was significantly associated with S aureus infection (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% CI, 2.1-32.3; P = .002). A total of 123 of 135 colonization isolates were sequenced. All recoverable infection isolates (4 of 7) of newborns with colonization were genetically identical to the colonizing isolate. Whole-genome sequencing indicated 23 potential transmission clusters.Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this cohort study suggest that nasal colonization is a relevant risk factor for S aureus infection in a nonoutbreak NICU setting. In colonized newborns, infection and colonization isolates were genetically identical, suggesting that eradication of colonization may be a useful measure to prevent infection. Further investigations are necessary to validate and assess the generalizability of our findings.

Dataset Information

One size does not fit all: why universal decolonization strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in adult intensive care units may be inappropriate for neonatal intensive care units.

Publications

One size does not fit all: why universal decolonization strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in adult intensive care units may be inappropriate for neonatal intensive care units.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets