Dataset Information

Evaluation of a Once-Daily Vancomycin Regimen in an Outpatient Leukemia/Bone Marrow Transplant Clinic (OD-VANCO Study).

ABSTRACT:

Background

The Leukemia/Bone Marrow Transplant Program of British Columbia manages patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia and those with non-neutropenic immunocompromised states in an outpatient clinic setting. Because the program treats outpatients only, once-daily administration of IV antibiotics is desirable. A high-dose, once-daily vancomycin nomogram was developed and implemented as part of the antibiotic treatment regimen.

Objective

To determine if therapeutic vancomycin trough levels could be achieved with a high-dose, once-daily regimen in this outpatient setting.

Methods

A prospective, single-centre, observational cohort study was conducted over a 7-month period. Outpatients in the Leukemia/Bone Marrow Transplant Program were started on IV vancomycin with the high-dose, once-daily vancomycin nomogram, and outcomes were assessed.

Results

Of 48 outpatients treated over the 7-month period, 10 (21%) had therapeutic vancomycin trough concentrations (i.e., greater than 10 mg/L). Thirty-five (90%) of the 39 patients with suspected clinical infection experienced clinical cure, and 6 (67%) of the 9 patients with documented microbiological infection experienced microbiological cure. Thirty (62%) of the 48 patients experienced symptoms of "red man syndrome", and 7 (15%) experienced some degree of nephrotoxicity. Two of 3 patients with laboratory-reported minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for identified pathogens had a calculated area under the curve to MIC ratio greater than or equal to 400.

Conclusion

The high-dose, once-daily vancomycin nomogram was effective in attaining trough levels greater than 10 mg/L in only 21% of patients in this study. A substantial number of adverse drug reactions were observed. Given these results, high-dose, once-daily vancomycin is no longer recommended for outpatient therapy.

SUBMITTER: Luo C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4152967 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTacrolimus is available as twice-daily Prograf® (Tac-BID) and the once-daily formulation, Advagraf® (Tac-OD). Although therapeutically equivalent, some transplant recipients require dose adjustments to achieve similar tacrolimus trough concentrations [Tac C0] after conversion between formulations. Tacrolimus is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5). We sought to determine whether genetic polymorphisms in the CYP3A5 enzyme; CYP3A5 *1/*1 and CYP3A5 *1/*3 (expressers) compared to CYP3A5 *3/*3 (non-expressers) could account for discrepancies in dose requirements following conversion from Tac-BID to Tac-OD.MethodsA cohort of 60 renal transplant recipients (RTR) from our larger conversion study of 496 patients underwent additional testing for CY3A5 genetic polymorphisms. Analysis included demographics, tac dosing and [Tac C0] pre- and post-conversion and dosing changes relative to CYP3A5 genotypes. CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms were identified through analysis of genomic DNA.ResultsConversion from tac bid to tac OD in this cohort required a mean (SD) dose increase from 3.1 (1.0) mg/day to 3.8 (1.3) mg/day (p = 0.007), to achieve similar [Tac C0]. The *1/*3 expresser group required a greater percentage dose adjustment (56.7 %) in converting from Tac-BID to Tac-OD as compared to the *3/*3 non-expresser group (26.6 %). Similar findings were observed with the both expresser groups combined (*1/*1 &*1/*3). The expressers were significantly more highly represented in the East Asian cohort.ConclusionsThe CYP3A5 expresser polymorphism necessitates an increase in dosing upon conversion from Tac-BID to Tac-OD, with the expresser genotypes contributing significantly to this finding. Given the variability in frequency of CYP3A5 genotypes in various ethnic groups, future studies should account for both isoenzyme polymorphism and ethnicity in optimizing dosing requirements.Trial registrationClinical trials.gov identifier: NCT01884480.

Project description:BackgroundOmadacycline is an oral and intravenous (IV) once-daily aminomethylcycline antibiotic that was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). In 2 phase 3 clinical trials, IV-to-oral switch and oral-only administration of omadacycline achieved the primary end points of noninferiority compared with linezolid in treating patients with ABSSSI.ObjectiveTo estimate the potential cost-savings with bioequivalent IV-to-oral antibiotics, such as omadacycline, compared with the standard of care with IV vancomycin by avoiding hospitalizations and reducing hospital stays in patients presenting from the emergency department for ABSSSI treatment.MethodsWe used hospital avoidance models to examine the potential cost-savings of managing patients with ABSSSI and no or limited comorbidities and without life-threatening conditions by using omadacycline in the outpatient setting compared with the current standard of care. Early hospital discharge models were used to evaluate the hospital stay reduction that would be required to be achieved with omadacycline treatment relative to IV vancomycin to confer cost-savings compared with standard of care among patients with ABSSSI and ?2 comorbidities but no life-threatening conditions.ResultsIn the hospital stay avoidance models, cost-savings may be realized by using therapeutically bioequivalent IV-to-oral antibiotics, such as omadacycline, compared with inpatient treatment with IV vancomycin. Based on a sensitivity analysis, further savings could be possible with outpatient administration of omadacycline, even if 20% of omadacycline outpatients were subsequently admitted and incurred the full inpatient cost, with no reimbursement penalties. Of more than 300 patients, only 1 was admitted to the hospital after a full course of omadacycline in the oral-only clinical trial. In the early hospital discharge models, the maximum cost-minimizing daily expense of omadacycline varied from $173 to $936, depending on the presence of active comorbidities or systemic symptoms, hospital stay reduction, and model perspective.ConclusionThese results suggest that the targeted use of antibiotics with bioequivalent IV-to-oral formulations, such as omadacycline, for select patients with ABSSSI may lead to cost-savings compared with inpatient IV vancomycin treatment by shifting care to the outpatient setting or by facilitating earlier hospital discharge among hospitalized patients.