Dataset Information

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer: Comparison of Peritumoral and Periareolar Injection.

ABSTRACT: Introduction: Intradermal periareolar injection technique for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may offer an advantage by including multifocal breast cancer as an additional indication. In May 2008 we changed our standard procedure from peritumoral (PT) to periareolar (PA) injection. We compared the results for corresponding periods before and after the change in procedure. Material and Method: A total of 117 patients (pts.) were investigated the year after we changed our technique; a total of 152?pts were investigated in the reference period 2007. We investigated the identification rates for sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) identified scintigraphically and surgically as well as the rates of metastatic involvement (LN). Results: After PT injection, scintigraphic detection of SLN failed in 5/152?pts., and in a further 10?pts. SLN was not found at surgery. In 7 of 15?pts. in whom SLN was not detected, histology demonstrated nodal involvement. Metastases were found in the SLN of 28 of 137?pts. with successful detection of SLN; no other lymph nodes were affected in 21 of these pts. (75.0?% of pts. with positive SLN detection). With PA injection at least one SLN could always be detected using scintigraphy; only 2/117 SLN could not be found intraoperatively. Metastasis was found in SLN in 34/115?pts.; in 19/34?pts., metastatic involvement was limited to the SLN with no other lymph nodes involved (55.9?% of pts. with positive detection of SLN). Discussion: The detection rate for SLN was significantly higher using PA injection (98.3?% vs. 90.1?%). As axillary dissection was not done in SLN-negative patients, rates of false-negative detection cannot be determined. PA injection not only results in better detection rates, it also offers the advantage that the technique can be performed correctly regardless of tumour localisation.

SUBMITTER: Rosenow T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4168532 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer: Comparison of Peritumoral and Periareolar Injection.

Rosenow T T Biedendieck C C Fricke H H Brinkmann M M Cirkel U U Reinbold W-D WD Fricke E E

Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 20121101 11

<b>Introduction:</b> Intradermal periareolar injection technique for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may offer an advantage by including multifocal breast cancer as an additional indication. In May 2008 we changed our standard procedure from peritumoral (PT) to periareolar (PA) injection. We compared the results for corresponding periods before and after the change in procedure. <b>Material and Method:</b> A total of 117 patients (pts.) were investigated the year after we changed our technique ...[more]

PMID: 25258459

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains controversial in patients with breast cancer who are initially lymph node-positive. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) on breast cancer recurrence and survival in patients who converted from lymph node-positive to pathological node-negative (ypN0) after NAC.MethodsThis single-center retrospective study included 223 patients who converted to axillary lymph node-negative status after NAC and underwent breast and axillary surgery between January 2006 and December 2015. This study compared the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), ipsilateral axillary lymph node recurrence rates and incidence of postoperative complications, especially, arm lymphedema and shoulder stiffness between SLNB and ALND.ResultsThis study included 223 patients with axillary pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC and surgery. The SLNB and ALND groups included 94 and 129 patients, respectively. The median follow-up time was 57 (range, 6-155) in the SLNB group and 99 (range 2-159) months in the ALND group. The corresponding 5-year OS and DFS rates were 96.3% and 94.2% (p = 0.392), and 89.2% and 86.4% (p = 0.671), respectively. Four patients (4.3%) in the SLNB group and nine (7.0%) in the ALND group developed locoregional recurrences. Ipsilateral axillary lymph node recurrence and distant metastasis were observed in one (1.1%) and three (2.3%) patients, and in 10 (10.6%) and 11 (8.5%) patients, respectively. Patients in the ALND group were more likely than their SLNB counterparts to experience complications, such as shoulder stiffness (9 [7.0%] vs. 4 [4.3%] patients, p = 0.57). The rate of lymphedema in the ALND group was three times that in the SLNB group (35 [27.1%] vs. 8 [8.5%] patients, p < 0.001).ConclusionAs an alternative to ALND, SLNB has oncological safety in patients with axillary pathological complete response after NAC.

Project description:To limit the potential short and long-term morbidity of lymphadenectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy has been proposed for endometrial cancer. The principle of sentinel lymph node biopsy relies on removal of a small number of lymph nodes that are the first drainage basins from a tumor and thus the most likely to harbor tumor cells. While the procedure may reduce morbidity, efficacy data are limited and little is known about how commonly the procedure is performed.We examined the patterns and predictors of use of sentinel lymph node biopsy and outcomes of the procedure in women with endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy.We used the Perspective database to identify women with uterine cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2011 through 2015. Billing and charge codes were used to classify women as having undergone lymphadenectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, or no nodal assessment. Multivariable models were used to examine clinical, demographic, and hospital characteristics with use of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Length of stay and cost were compared among the different methods of nodal assessment.Among 28,362 patients, 9327 (32.9%) did not undergo nodal assessment, 17,669 (62.3%) underwent lymphadenectomy, and 1366 (4.8%) underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 1.3% (95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.6%) of abdominal hysterectomies, 3.4% (95% confidence interval, 2.7-4.1%) of laparoscopic hysterectomies, and 7.5% (95% confidence interval, 7.0-8.0%) of robotic-assisted hysterectomies. In a multivariable model, more recent year of surgery was associated with performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Compared to abdominal hysterectomy, those undergoing laparoscopic (adjusted risk ratio, 2.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.89-3.18) and robotic-assisted (adjusted risk ratio, 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.19-3.30) hysterectomy were more likely to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy. Among women who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy, length of stay and cost were lower for sentinel lymph node biopsy compared to lymphadenectomy.The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy for endometrial cancer increased from 2011 through 2015. The increased use was most notable in women who underwent a robotic-assisted hysterectomy.

Dataset Information

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer: Comparison of Peritumoral and Periareolar Injection.

Publications

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer: Comparison of Peritumoral and Periareolar Injection.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets