Dataset Information

Stereotactic aspiration versus craniotomy for primary intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

ABSTRACT:

Background

A wealth of evidence based on the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has indicated that surgery may be a better choice in the management of primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) compared to conservative treatment. However, there is considerable controversy over selecting appropriate surgical procedures for ICH. Thus, this meta-analysis was performed to assess the effects of stereotactic aspiration compared to craniotomy in patients with ICH.

Methods

According to the study strategy, we searched PUBMED, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Other sources such as the internet-based clinical trial registries, relevant journals and the lists of references were also searched. After literature searching, two investigators independently performed literature screening, assessment of quality of the included trials and data extraction. The outcome measures included death or dependence, total risk of complication, and the risk of rebleeding, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and systematic infection.

Results

Four RCTs with 2996 participants were included. The quality of the included trials was acceptable. Stereotactic aspiration significantly decreased the odds of death or dependence at the final follow-up (odds ratio (OR): 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.93; P?=?0.004) and the risk of intracerebral rebleeding (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.74; P?=?0.002) compared to craniotomy with no significant heterogeneity among the study results.

Conclusions

The present meta-analysis provides evidence that the stereotactic aspiration may be associated with a reduction in the odds of being dead or dependent in primary ICH, which should be interpreted with caution. Further trials are needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from the stereotactic aspiration.

SUBMITTER: Wang JW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4169548 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Stereotactic aspiration versus craniotomy for primary intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Wang Jia-Wei JW Li Jin-Ping JP Song Ying-Lun YL Tan Ke K Wang Yu Y Li Tao T Guo Peng P Li Xiong X Wang Yan Y Zhao Qi-Huang QH

PloS one 20140919 9

<h4>Background</h4>A wealth of evidence based on the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has indicated that surgery may be a better choice in the management of primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) compared to conservative treatment. However, there is considerable controversy over selecting appropriate surgical procedures for ICH. Thus, this meta-analysis was performed to assess the effects of stereotactic aspiration compared to craniotomy in patients with ICH.<h4>Methods</h4>According to the s ...[more]

PMID: 25237813

Similar Datasets

Project description:A large number of clinical studies suggested that surgery might be a better choice than conservative treatment for treating hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in the middle-aged and elderly. Stereotactic puncture can reduce the mass effect caused by hematoma, reduce the intervention of body homeostasis, reduce brain tissue damage, and improve the prognosis of patients with cerebral hemorrhage. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic puncture and craniotomy in elderly patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. A search strategy was designed to search in databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CNKI, Wanfang database and relevant references. Literature on the efficacy and safety of different surgical methods for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage in the middle-aged and elderly were retrieved. The search time was until August 17, 2022. Keywords included "hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage," "stereotactic hematoma removal," "craniotomy." After the literature search, 2 researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality evaluation of included trials and data extraction. RevMan5.4 software was used to perform a Meta-analysis on the operation time, hospital stay, postoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, postoperative daily activity ability, postoperative complications and neurological prognosis scores included in the included studies. A total of 1988 samples were included in 9 studies. 1022 patients underwent stereotactic hematoma removal, and 968 patients underwent craniotomy hematoma removal. The orientation group had more advantages in the length of hospital stay, postoperative disability, pulmonary infection, intracranial infection and digestive tract ulcer, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). In addition, the length of stay (I²= 83%) of the included articles had good homogeneity (I²< 50%), and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in operation time, postoperative GCS score, postoperative daily activity ability, and neurological prognosis score (P > .05). The meta-analysis indicate that compared to craniotomy for hematoma removal, stereotactic hematoma removal can reduce the postoperative disability rate, intracranial infection rate, lung infection rate, and digestive tract ulcer rate in middle-aged and elderly patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.

Project description:Background: The role of tranexamic acid (TXA) in preventing hematoma expansion (HE) in patients with acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains unclear. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of TXA in acute spontaneous ICH with a particular focus on subgroups. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved from CENTRAL, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, PubMed, and WHO ICTRP. The primary outcome measurement was HE. The secondary outcome measurements included 3-month poor functional outcome (PFO), 3-month mortality, and major thromboembolic events (MTE). We conducted subgroup analysis according to the CT markers of HE (standard-risk population and high-risk population) and the time from onset to randomization (>4.5 and ≤4.5 h). Results: We identified seven studies (representing five RCTs) involving 2,650 participants. Compared with placebo, TXA may reduce HE on subsequent imaging (odd ratio [OR] 0.825; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.692-0.984; p = 0.033; I2 = 0%; GRADE: moderate certainty). TXA and placebo arms did not differ in the rates of 3-month PFO, 3-month mortality, and MTE. Subgroup analysis indicated that TXA reduced the risk of HE in the high-risk population with CT markers of HE (OR 0.646; 95% CI 0.503-0.829; p = 0.001; I2 = 0 %) and in patients who were treated within 4.5 h of symptom onset (OR 0.823; 95% CI 0.690-0.980; p = 0.029; I2 = 0%), but this protective effect was not observed in the standard-risk population and patients who were treated over 4.5 h of symptom onset. Conclusions: Tranexamic acid (TXA) may decrease the risk of HE in patients with acute spontaneous ICH. Importantly, the decreased risk was observed in patients who were treatable within 4.5 h and with a high risk of HE, but not in those who were treatable over 4.5 h and in standard-risk population. However, PFO or mortality at 3 months did not significantly differ between patients who received TXA and those who received placebo. TXA is safe for acute spontaneous ICH without increasing MTE.

Project description:BackgroundTo compare the long-term therapeutic effects of stereotactic aspiration (SA), endoscopic evacuation (EE), and open craniotomy (OC) in the surgical treatment of spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage and explore the appropriate clinical indications for each technique.MethodsMultiple-treatment inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of these techniques. The primary and secondary outcomes were 6-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and mortality rates, respectively.ResultsA total of 703 patients were ultimately enrolled. For the entire cohort, the 6-month mortality rate was significantly higher (OR 2.396, 95% CI: 1.865-3.080), and the 6-month functional outcome was significantly worse (OR 1.359, 95% CI: 1.091-1.692) for SA than that of EE. The 6-month mortality rate for OC was significantly higher (OR 1.395, 95% CI: 1.059-1.837) than that of EE. Further subgroup analysis was stratified by initial hematoma volume and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. The mortality rate for SA was significantly higher for patients with hematoma volume of 20-40 mL (OR 6.226, 95% CI: 3.848-10.075), 40-80 mL (OR 2.121, 95% CI: 1.492-3.016), and ≥80 mL (OR 5.544, 95% CI: 3.315-9.269) than in the same subgroups of EE. The functional outcomes for SA were significantly worse than that of EE for hematoma volume subgroups of 40-80 mL (OR 1.424, 95% CI: 1.039-1.951) and ≥80 mL (OR 4.224, 95% CI: 1.655-10.776). The mortality rate for SA was significantly higher than that of EE for the GCS score subgroups of 6-8 (OR 2.082, 95% CI: 1.410-3.076) and 3-5 (OR 2.985, 95% CI: 1.904-4.678). The mortality rate for OC was significantly higher for the GCS score of 3-5 subgroup (OR 1.718, 95% CI: 1.115-2.648), and a tendency for a higher mortality rate of 6-8 subgroup (OR 1.442, 95% CI: 0.965-2.156) than that of EE.ConclusionsEE can decrease the 6-month mortality rate and improve the 6-month functional outcomes of spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage in patients with a hematoma volume ≥40 mL. EE can decrease the 6-month mortality rate of spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage in patients with a GCS score of 3-8.

Dataset Information

Stereotactic aspiration versus craniotomy for primary intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Stereotactic aspiration versus craniotomy for primary intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets