Dataset Information

The effect of pylorus removal on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of 2,599 patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Delayed gastric emptying is a serious complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy. The effect of pylorus removal on delayed gastric emptying has not been well evaluated.

Study design

We searched five databases (PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science) up to July 2014. The meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate any factors accountable for the heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test, and corrected by Duval's trim and fill method. Subgroup analyses were conducted for different surgical techniques of pyloric removal. Other intraoperative and postoperative parameters were compared between two groups.

Results

We included 27 studies involving 2,599 patients, with a moderate-high heterogeneity for primary outcome (I(2) = 63%). Meta-regression analysis showed that four variables primarily contributed to the heterogeneity, namely nasogastric tube intubation time, solid food start time, preoperative diabetes percentage and the number of patients in pylorus-preserving group. After excluding four studies, the remaining twenty-three studies showed reduced heterogeneity (I(2) = 51%). Then we used Duval's trim and fill method to correct publication bias. The corrected MH odds ratio was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.52-1.17). A subgroup analysis showed that pylorus removal tends to reduce delayed gastric emptying incidence for subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy or pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy, compared with pylorus-preserving group. However, standard Whipple procedure failed to show any significant reduction of DGE compared with pylorus-removal group. No significant differences were observed in terms of length of hospital stay, infection and pancreatic fistula; however, pylorus removal resulted in longer operation time, more blood loss and higher mortality.

Conclusion

The pylorus removal does not significantly reduce the overall incidence of delayed gastric emptying. Subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy or pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy tends to reduce delayed gastric emptying incidence, but needs further validation.

SUBMITTER: Wu W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4182728 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The effect of pylorus removal on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of 2,599 patients.

Wu Wenming W Hong Xiafei X Fu Lilan L Liu Shanglong S You Lei L Zhou Li L Zhao Yupei Y

PloS one 20141001 10

<h4>Background</h4>Delayed gastric emptying is a serious complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy. The effect of pylorus removal on delayed gastric emptying has not been well evaluated.<h4>Study design</h4>We searched five databases (PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science) up to July 2014. The meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate any factors accountable for the heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test, and ...[more]

PMID: 25272034

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term survival, mortality, morbidity and the operation-related events in patients with periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (PRPD).MethodA systematic search of literature databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science) was performed to identify studies. Outcome measures comparing PPPD versus PRPD for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma were long-term survival, mortality, morbidity (overall morbidity, delayed gastric emptying [DGE], pancreatic fistula, wound infection, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage) and operation related events (hospital stays, operating time, intraoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusions).ResultsEight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 622 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Among these patients, it revealed no difference in long-term survival between the PPPD and PRPD groups (HR?=?0.23, p?=?0.11). There was a lower rate of DGE (RR?=?2.35, p?=?0.04, 95% CI, 1.06-5.21) with PRPD. Mortality, overall morbidity, pancreatic fistula, wound infection, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage were not significantly different between the groups. PPPDs were performed more quickly than PRPDs (WMD?=?53.25 minutes, p?=?0.01, 95% CI, 12.53-93.97); and there was less estimated intraoperative blood loss (WMD?=?365.21 ml, p?=?0.006, 95% CI, 102.71-627.71) and fewer red blood cell transfusions (WMD?=?0.29 U, p?=?0.003, 95% CI, 0.10-0.48) in patients undergoing PPPD. The hospital stays showed no significant difference.ConclusionsPPPD had advantages over PRPD in operating time, intraoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusions, but had a significantly higher rate of DGE for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. PPPD and PRPD had comparable mortality and morbidity including pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage. Our conclusions were limited by the available data. Further evaluations of high-quality RCTs are needed.

Project description:ImportanceTechnical proficiency at robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and video assessment are promising tools for understanding postoperative outcomes. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) remains a major driver of cost and morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy.ObjectiveTo determine if technical variables during RPD are associated with postoperative DGE.Design, setting, and participantsA retrospective study was conducted of technical assessment performed in all available videos (n = 192) of consecutive RPDs performed at a single academic institution from October 3, 2008, through September 27, 2016.ExposuresVideo review of gastrojejunal anastomosis during RPD.Main outcomes and measuresDelayed gastric emptying was classified according to International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery criteria. Video analysis reviewed technical variables specific in the construction of the gastrojejunal anastomosis. Using multivariate analysis, DGE was correlated with known patient variables and technical variables, individually and combined.ResultsOf 410 RPDs performed, video was available for 192 RPDs (80 women and 112 men; mean [SD] age, 65.7 [11.1] years). Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 41 patients (21.4%; grade A, 15; grade B, 14; and grade C, 12). Patient variables contributing to DGE on multivariate analysis were advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16; P < .001), small pancreatic duct size (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; P = .03), and postoperative pseudoaneurysm (OR, 17.29; 95% CI, 2.34-127.78; P = .005). However, technical variables contributing to decreased DGE on multivariate analysis included the flow angle (within 30° of vertical) between the stomach and efferent jejunal limb (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.79; P = .02), greater length of the gastrojejunal anastomosis (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.77; P = .006), and a robotic-sewn anastomosis (robotic suture vs stapler: OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-0.95; P = .04).Conclusions and relevanceThis study examines modifiable technical factors through the use of review of video obtained at the time of operation and suggests ways by which the surgical construction of the gastrojejunal anastomosis during RPD may reduce the incidence of DGE as a framework for prospective quality improvement.

Project description:BackgroundAnalysis of the risk factors associated with functional delayed gastric emptying after distal gastric cancer surgery to provide a basis for further reduction of the incidence of this complication.MethodsTotal of 1382 patients with distal gastric cancer from January 2016 to October 2018 were enrolled. Correlation analysis was performed in 53 patients with FDGE by logistic regression. Subgroup risk analysis was performed in 114 patients with preoperative pyloric obstruction. A Pearson Chi-square analysis was used to compare categorical variables between normal distribution groups. Meanwhile, a t test was used to compare continuous variables between groups. Odds ratio (OR) was used for comparison of the two groups, and it was summarized with its 95% confidence interval (CI) and p value using logistic regression.ResultIn multivariable analysis, age (OR 1.081, 95% CI, 1.047-1.117), BMI (OR 1.233, 95% CI, 1.116-1.363), preoperative pyloric obstruction (OR 3.831, 95% CI, 1.829-8.023), smaller volume of residual stomach (OR 1.838, 95% CI, 1.325-6.080), and anastomosis in greater curvature perpendicular (OR 3.385, 95% CI, 1.632-7.019) and in greater curvature parallel (OR 2.375, 95% CI, 0.963-5.861) were independent risk factors of FDGE. In the preoperative pyloric obstruction group, higher BMI (OR 1.309, 95% CI, 1.086-1.579) and preoperative obstruction time (OR 1.054, 95% CI, 1.003-1.108) were independent risk factors of FDGE and preoperative gastrointestinal decompression (OR 0.231, 95% CI, 0.068-0.785) was independent protective factor of FDGE.ConclusionAdequate gastrointestinal decompression should be performed before the operation to reduce the incidence of postoperative gastroparesis in patients with preoperative pyloric obstruction. We also could improve the surgical methods to reduce the occurrence of FDGE, such as controlling the size of the residual stomach, ensuring blood supply. Especially selecting an appropriate stapler and anastomosis during the anastomosis process, the occurrence of FDGE can be reduced.

Dataset Information

The effect of pylorus removal on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of 2,599 patients.

Background

Study design

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The effect of pylorus removal on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of 2,599 patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets