Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
This meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of recent adherence-promoting interventions for youth with chronic health conditions.Methods
Peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials of adherence-promoting interventions for youth with a chronic illness published between 2007 and 2013 (n = 23) were reviewed. Intervention delivery (in-person vs. technology-based) and outcome measurement (e.g., self-report) were examined as potential moderators of treatment effects.Results
Mean effect sizes were small at posttreatment (d = 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08, 0.31, n = 23) and follow-up (d = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.43, n = 9). Intervention delivery and outcome measurement did not account for variation in treatment effects (p > .05).Conclusions
The small treatment effects of recent adherence-promoting intervention (APIs) reflect the methodological limitations of the included studies and the need to reexamine the delivery and mechanisms of adherence-promoting interventions.
SUBMITTER: Pai AL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4192048 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Pai Ahna L H AL McGrady Meghan M
Journal of pediatric psychology 20140620 8
<h4>Objective</h4>This meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of recent adherence-promoting interventions for youth with chronic health conditions.<h4>Methods</h4>Peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials of adherence-promoting interventions for youth with a chronic illness published between 2007 and 2013 (n = 23) were reviewed. Intervention delivery (in-person vs. technology-based) and outcome measurement (e.g., self-report) were examined as potential moderators of treatment effects.<h4>Resu ...[more]