Dataset Information

Whole brain radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: The aim of the present meta-analysis is to evaluate the response rate, median survival time (MST) and toxicity in patients with brain metastases (BM) originating from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and who were treated using either whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus concurrent chemotherapy or WBRT alone.PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, clinical trials and current controlled trials were searched to identify any relevant publications. After screening the literature and undertaking quality assessment and data extraction, the meta-analysis was performed using Stata11.0 software.In total, six randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving 910 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the analysis indicate that WBRT plus concurrent chemotherapy was more effective at improving response rate (RR?=?2.06, 95% CI [1.13, 3.77]; P?=?0.019) than WBRT alone. However, WBRT plus concurrent chemotherapy did not improve median survival time (MST) (HR?=?1.09, 95%CI [0.94, 1.26]; P?=?0.233) or time of neurological progression (CNS-TTP) (HR?=?0.93, 95%CI [0.75, 1.16]; P?=?0.543), and increased adverse events (Grade?3) (RR?=?2.59, 95% CI [1.88, 3.58]; P?=?0.000). There were no significant differences in Grade 3-5 neurological or hematological toxicity between two patient groups (RR?=?1.08, 95%CI [0.23, 5.1]; P?=?0.92).The combination of chemotherapy plus WBRT in patients with BM originating from NSCLC may increase treatment response rates of brain metastases with limited toxicity. Although the therapy schedule did not prolong MST or CNS-TTP, further assessment is warranted.

SUBMITTER: Qin H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4210217 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Whole brain radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a meta-analysis.

Qin Hong H Pan Feng F Li Jianjun J Zhang Xiaoli X Liang Houjie H Ruan Zhihua Z

PloS one 20141027 10

<h4>Objective</h4>The aim of the present meta-analysis is to evaluate the response rate, median survival time (MST) and toxicity in patients with brain metastases (BM) originating from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and who were treated using either whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus concurrent chemotherapy or WBRT alone.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, clinical trials and current controlled trials were searched to identify any relevant publications. Af ...[more]

PMID: 25347291

Similar Datasets

Project description:The immune modulatory drug chloroquine (CQ) has been demonstrated to enhance survival following radiotherapy in patients with high-grade glioma in a clinical trial, but the efficacy in patients with brain metastases is unknown. We hypothesized that short-course CQ during whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) would improve response to local therapy in patients with brain metastases. A prospective, single-cohort study was performed combining WBRT with concurrent CQ to assess both the feasibility of and intracranial response to combined therapy in patients with brain metastases. Safety, tolerability and overall survival of this combination was also examined, along with allelic status of IDO2 (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2), an immune modulatory enzyme inhibited by chloroquine that may affect survival outcomes. CQ therapy (250 mg by mouth daily) was initiated 1 week before WBRT (37.5 Gy in 2.5 Gy daily fractions) in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases from biopsy-proven, primary lung, breast or ovarian solid tumors (n=20). The primary endpoint was radiologic response 3 months after combined CQ and WBRT therapy. Secondary endpoints included toxicity and overall survival. Patients were stratified by IDO2 allelic status. After a median clinical follow up of 5 months (range, 0.5-31), 16 patients were evaluable for radiologic response which was complete response in two patients, partial response in 13 patients and stable disease in one patient. There were no treatment-related grade≥3 toxicities or treatment interruption due to toxicity. Median and mean overall survival was 5.7 and 8.9 months, respectively (range, 0.8-31). A trend toward increased overall survival was observed in patients with wild-type IDO2 compared to patients with heterozygous or homozygous configurations that ablate IDO2 enzyme activity (10.4 mos vs. 4.1 mos.; p=0.07). WBRT with concurrent, short-course CQ is well tolerated in patients with brain metastases. The high intracranial disease control rate warrants additional study.

Project description:BackgroundThe benefits of adding upfront whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) when compared to surgery or SRS alone for treatment of brain metastases are unclear.ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of surgery or SRS plus WBRT with that of surgery or SRS alone for treatment of brain metastases in patients with systemic cancer.Search methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to May 2013 and annual meeting proceedings of ASCO and ASTRO up to September 2012 for relevant studies.Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgery or SRS plus WBRT with surgery or SRS alone for treatment of brain metastases.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors undertook the quality assessment and data extraction. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes include progression free survival (PFS), local and distant intracranial disease progression, neurocognitive function (NF), health related quality of life (HRQL) and neurological adverse events. Hazard ratios (HR), risk ratio (RR), confidence intervals (CI), P-values (P) were estimated with random effects models using Revman 5.1 MAIN RESULTS: We identified five RCTs including 663 patients with one to four brain metastases. The risk of bias associated with lack of blinding was high and impacted to a greater or lesser extent on the quality of evidence for all of the outcomes. Adding upfront WBRT decreased the relative risk of any intracranial disease progression at one year by 53% (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.66, P value < 0.0001, I(2) =34%, Chi(2) P value = 0.21, low quality evidence) but there was no clear evidence of a difference in OS (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.48, P value = 0.47, I(2) = 52%, Chi(2) P value = 0.08, low quality evidence) and PFS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.10, P value = 0.14, I(2) = 16%, Chi(2) P value = 0.28, low quality evidence). Subgroup analyses showed that the effects on overall survival were similar regardless of types of focal therapy used, number of brain metastases, dose and sequence of WBRT. The evaluation of the impact of upfront WBRT on NF, HRQL and neurological adverse events was limited by the unclear and high risk of reporting, performance and detection bias, and inconsistency in the instruments and methods used to measure and report results across studies.Authors' conclusionsThere is low quality evidence that adding upfront WBRT to surgery or SRS decreases any intracranial disease progression at one year. There was no clear evidence of an effect on overall and progression free survival. The impact of upfront WBRT on neurocognitive function, health related quality of life and neurological adverse events was undetermined due to the high risk of performance and detection bias, and inconsistency in the instruments and methods used to measure and report results across studies.

Project description:ImportanceAlthough stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is preferred for limited brain metastases from most histologies, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has remained the standard of care for patients with small cell lung cancer. Data on SRS are limited.ObjectiveTo characterize and compare first-line SRS outcomes (without prior WBRT or prophylactic cranial irradiation) with those of first-line WBRT.Design, setting, and participantsFIRE-SCLC (First-line Radiosurgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer) was a multicenter cohort study that analyzed SRS outcomes from 28 centers and a single-arm trial and compared these data with outcomes from a first-line WBRT cohort. Data were collected from October 26, 2017, to August 15, 2019, and analyzed from August 16, 2019, to November 6, 2019.InterventionsSRS and WBRT for small cell lung cancer brain metastases.Main outcomes and measuresOverall survival, time to central nervous system progression (TTCP), and central nervous system (CNS) progression-free survival (PFS) after SRS were evaluated and compared with WBRT outcomes, with adjustment for performance status, number of brain metastases, synchronicity, age, sex, and treatment year in multivariable and propensity score-matched analyses.ResultsIn total, 710 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 68.5 [62-74] years; 531 men [74.8%]) who received SRS between 1994 and 2018 were analyzed. The median overall survival was 8.5 months, the median TTCP was 8.1 months, and the median CNS PFS was 5.0 months. When stratified by the number of brain metastases treated, the median overall survival was 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.9-13.4) for 1 lesion, 8.7 months (95% CI, 7.7-10.4) for 2 to 4 lesions, 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.4-9.6) for 5 to 10 lesions, and 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.3-7.6) for 11 or more lesions. Competing risk estimates were 7.0% (95% CI, 4.9%-9.2%) for local failures at 12 months and 41.6% (95% CI, 37.6%-45.7%) for distant CNS failures at 12 months. Leptomeningeal progression (46 of 425 patients [10.8%] with available data) and neurological mortality (80 of 647 patients [12.4%] with available data) were uncommon. On propensity score-matched analyses comparing SRS with WBRT, WBRT was associated with improved TTCP (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.55; P < .001), without an improvement in overall survival (median, 6.5 months [95% CI, 5.5-8.0] for SRS vs 5.2 months [95% CI, 4.4-6.7] for WBRT; P = .003) or CNS PFS (median, 4.0 months for SRS vs 3.8 months for WBRT; P = .79). Multivariable analyses comparing SRS and WBRT, including subset analyses controlling for extracranial metastases and extracranial disease control status, demonstrated similar results.Conclusions and relevanceResults of this study suggest that the primary trade-offs associated with SRS without WBRT, including a shorter TTCP without a decrease in overall survival, are similar to those observed in settings in which SRS is already established.

Dataset Information

Whole brain radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a meta-analysis.

Publications

Whole brain radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets