Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Global validation of a process-based model on vegetation gross primary production using eddy covariance observations.


ABSTRACT: Gross Primary Production (GPP) is the largest flux in the global carbon cycle. However, large uncertainties in current global estimations persist. In this study, we examined the performance of a process-based model (Integrated BIosphere Simulator, IBIS) at 62 eddy covariance sites around the world. Our results indicated that the IBIS model explained 60% of the observed variation in daily GPP at all validation sites. Comparison with a satellite-based vegetation model (Eddy Covariance-Light Use Efficiency, EC-LUE) revealed that the IBIS simulations yielded comparable GPP results as the EC-LUE model. Global mean GPP estimated by the IBIS model was 107.50±1.37 Pg C year(-1) (mean value ± standard deviation) across the vegetated area for the period 2000-2006, consistent with the results of the EC-LUE model (109.39±1.48 Pg C year(-1)). To evaluate the uncertainty introduced by the parameter Vcmax, which represents the maximum photosynthetic capacity, we inversed Vcmax using Markov Chain-Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedures. Using the inversed Vcmax values, the simulated global GPP increased by 16.5 Pg C year(-1), indicating that IBIS model is sensitive to Vcmax, and large uncertainty exists in model parameterization.

SUBMITTER: Liu D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4222824 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Global validation of a process-based model on vegetation gross primary production using eddy covariance observations.

Liu Dan D   Cai Wenwen W   Xia Jiangzhou J   Dong Wenjie W   Zhou Guangsheng G   Chen Yang Y   Zhang Haicheng H   Yuan Wenping W  

PloS one 20141106 11


Gross Primary Production (GPP) is the largest flux in the global carbon cycle. However, large uncertainties in current global estimations persist. In this study, we examined the performance of a process-based model (Integrated BIosphere Simulator, IBIS) at 62 eddy covariance sites around the world. Our results indicated that the IBIS model explained 60% of the observed variation in daily GPP at all validation sites. Comparison with a satellite-based vegetation model (Eddy Covariance-Light Use Ef  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5667571 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6989137 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9110750 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4603761 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5964230 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6361900 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4966955 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9298043 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7518252 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5180184 | biostudies-literature