Dataset Information

Surgeon's experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative study.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to provide healthcare professionals with peer benchmarked feedback is growing. However, there is little evidence on the opinions of professionals on the value of this information in practice. The purpose of this research is to explore surgeon's experiences of receiving peer benchmarked PROMs feedback and to examine whether this information led to changes in their practice. METHODS: This qualitative research employed a Framework approach. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with surgeons who received peer benchmarked PROMs feedback. The participants included eleven consultant orthopaedic surgeons in the Republic of Ireland. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: conceptual, methodological, practical, attitudinal, and impact. A typology was developed based on the attitudinal and impact themes from which three distinct groups emerged. 'Advocates' had positive attitudes towards PROMs and confirmed that the information promoted a self-reflective process. 'Converts' were uncertain about the value of PROMs, which reduced their inclination to use the data. 'Sceptics' had negative attitudes towards PROMs and claimed that the information had no impact on their behaviour. The conceptual, methodological and practical factors were linked to the typology. CONCLUSION: Surgeons had mixed opinions on the value of peer benchmarked PROMs data. Many appreciated the feedback as it reassured them that their practice was similar to their peers. However, PROMs information alone was considered insufficient to help identify opportunities for quality improvements. The reasons for the observed reluctance of participants to embrace PROMs can be categorised into conceptual, methodological, and practical factors. Policy makers and researchers need to increase professionals' awareness of the numerous purposes and benefits of using PROMs, challenge the current methods to measure performance using PROMs, and reduce the burden of data collection and information dissemination on routine practice.

SUBMITTER: Boyce MB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4227108 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Surgeon's experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative study.

Boyce Maria B MB Browne John P JP Greenhalgh Joanne J

Implementation science : IS 20140627

<h4>Background</h4>The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to provide healthcare professionals with peer benchmarked feedback is growing. However, there is little evidence on the opinions of professionals on the value of this information in practice. The purpose of this research is to explore surgeon's experiences of receiving peer benchmarked PROMs feedback and to examine whether this information led to changes in their practice.<h4>Methods</h4>This qualitative research employed a ...[more]

PMID: 24972784

Similar Datasets

Project description:Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are linked to adverse health outcomes for adults and children in the United States. The prevalence of critically ill children who are exposed to ACEs is not known. Our objective was to compare the frequency of ACEs of critically ill children with that of the general pediatric population of Georgia and the United States using publicly available National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) data. The impact of ACEs on patient-reported outcome measures of emotional, social, and physical health in critically ill children is not known. We sought to determine whether a higher total number of ACEs was associated with poorer patient-reported measures of emotional, social, and physical health. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of children < 18 years of age who were admitted to a 36-bed free-standing, quaternary academic pediatric intensive care unit in Atlanta, Georgia from June 2020-December 2021. Parents of patients who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit completed a survey regarding their child's ACEs, health care use patterns, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMIS) of emotional, social, and physical health. Prevalence estimates of ACEs were compared with national and state data from the NSCH using Rao-Scott Chi-square tests. PROMIS measures reported within the PICU cohort were compared with population normed T-scores. The association of cumulative ACEs within the PICU cohort with patient-reported outcomes of emotional, social, and physical health were evaluated with a t-test. Among the 84 participants, 54% had ≥ 1 ACE, 29% had ≥ 2 ACEs, and 10% had ≥ 3 ACEs. Children with ≥ 2 ACEs had poorer anxiety and family relationship T-scores compared to those with ≤ 1 ACE. Given the high burden of ACEs in critically ill children, screening for ACEs may identify vulnerable children that would benefit from interventions and support to mitigate the negative effects of ACEs and toxic stress on emotional, social, and physical health.

Project description:BACKGROUND:This article addresses patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based follow-up used as a substitute for regularly scheduled follow-ups. In PRO-based follow-up, patients' PRO data filled in by the patients at home are used by clinicians as a decision aid to identify those who need clinical attention based on an automated PRO algorithm, clinical attention being either a phone call or a physical consultation. A physical consultation in the outpatient clinic prompted by the patient's PRO is termed a "PRO consultation." In this multi-perspective qualitative study, we explored the influence of patients' self-reported data on patient-clinician interaction during PRO consultations in epilepsy outpatient clinics. Interpretive description was the methodological approach, applying data from participant observations, informal interviews with clinicians, and semi-structured interviews with clinicians and patients. RESULTS:We found that application and deliberate use of patients' PRO measures can affect patient-clinician interaction, promoting patient involvement in terms of improved communication and increased patient activation. These findings reflect the general patterns that have been reported in the literature. In addition, we found that PRO measures also may induce unmet expectations among some patients that can have a negative effect on patients' experiences of the interaction and their follow-up experience in general. We extracted two thematic patterns that represent PRO measures' potential for patient involvement in the patient-clinician interaction. The first pattern represents enablers, and the second pattern represents barriers for PRO measures to affect patient involvement. CONCLUSIONS:Applying PRO measures in clinical practice does not automatically enhance the patient-clinician interaction. To strengthen the benefits of PRO measures, the following supplementary clinical initiatives are suggested: summarizing and reporting the PRO measures back to the patient, considering carefully which PRO measures to include, training clinicians and assuring that the patients' introduction to PRO-based follow-up clarifies expectations.

Dataset Information

Surgeon's experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative study.

Publications

Surgeon's experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets