Dataset Information

BBCA: Improving the scalability of *BEAST using random binning.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Species tree estimation can be challenging in the presence of gene tree conflict due to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), which can occur when the time between speciation events is short relative to the population size. Of the many methods that have been developed to estimate species trees in the presence of ILS, *BEAST, a Bayesian method that co-estimates the species tree and gene trees given sequence alignments on multiple loci, has generally been shown to have the best accuracy. However, *BEAST is extremely computationally intensive so that it cannot be used with large numbers of loci; hence, *BEAST is not suitable for genome-scale analyses.

Results

We present BBCA (boosted binned coalescent-based analysis), a method that can be used with *BEAST (and other such co-estimation methods) to improve scalability. BBCA partitions the loci randomly into subsets, uses *BEAST on each subset to co-estimate the gene trees and species tree for the subset, and then combines the newly estimated gene trees together using MP-EST, a popular coalescent-based summary method. We compare time-restricted versions of BBCA and *BEAST on simulated datasets, and show that BBCA is at least as accurate as *BEAST, and achieves better convergence rates for large numbers of loci.

Conclusions

Phylogenomic analysis using *BEAST is currently limited to datasets with a small number of loci, and analyses with even just 100 loci can be computationally challenging. BBCA uses a very simple divide-and-conquer approach that makes it possible to use *BEAST on datasets containing hundreds of loci. This study shows that BBCA provides excellent accuracy and is highly scalable.

SUBMITTER: Zimmermann T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4239591 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

BBCA: Improving the scalability of *BEAST using random binning.

Zimmermann Théo T Mirarab Siavash S Warnow Tandy T

BMC genomics 20141017

<h4>Background</h4>Species tree estimation can be challenging in the presence of gene tree conflict due to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), which can occur when the time between speciation events is short relative to the population size. Of the many methods that have been developed to estimate species trees in the presence of ILS, *BEAST, a Bayesian method that co-estimates the species tree and gene trees given sequence alignments on multiple loci, has generally been shown to have the best accu ...[more]

PMID: 25572469

Similar Datasets

Project description:Metagenomics sequencing provides deep insights into microbial communities. To investigate their taxonomic structure, binning assembled contigs into discrete clusters is critical. Many binning algorithms have been developed, but their performance is not always satisfactory, especially for complex microbial communities, calling for further development.According to previous studies, relative sequence compositions are similar across different regions of the same genome, but they differ between distinct genomes. Generally, current tools have used the normalized frequency of k-tuples directly, but this represents an absolute, not relative, sequence composition. Therefore, we attempted to model contigs using relative k-tuple composition, followed by measuring dissimilarity between contigs using [Formula: see text]. The [Formula: see text] was designed to measure the dissimilarity between two long sequences or Next-Generation Sequencing data with the Markov models of the background genomes. This method was effective in revealing group and gradient relationships between genomes, metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. With many binning tools available, we do not try to bin contigs from scratch. Instead, we developed [Formula: see text] to adjust contigs among bins based on the output of existing binning tools for a single metagenomic sample. The tool is taxonomy-free and depends only on k-tuples. To evaluate the performance of [Formula: see text], five widely used binning tools with different strategies of sequence composition or the hybrid of sequence composition and abundance were selected to bin six synthetic and real datasets, after which [Formula: see text] was applied to adjust the binning results. Our experiments showed that [Formula: see text] consistently achieves the best performance with tuple length k?=?6 under the independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) background model. Using the metrics of recall, precision and ARI (Adjusted Rand Index), [Formula: see text] improves the binning performance in 28 out of 30 testing experiments (6 datasets with 5 binning tools). The [Formula: see text] is available at https://github.com/kunWangkun/d2SBin .Experiments showed that [Formula: see text] accurately measures the dissimilarity between contigs of metagenomic reads and that relative sequence composition is more reasonable to bin the contigs. The [Formula: see text] can be applied to any existing contig-binning tools for single metagenomic samples to obtain better binning results.

Dataset Information

BBCA: Improving the scalability of *BEAST using random binning.

Background

Results

Conclusions

Publications

BBCA: Improving the scalability of *BEAST using random binning.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets