Dataset Information

Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in children.

ABSTRACT: Teicoplanin is frequently administered to treat Gram-positive infections in pediatric patients. However, not enough is known about the pharmacokinetics (PK) of teicoplanin in children to justify the optimal dosing regimen. The aim of this study was to determine the population PK of teicoplanin in children and evaluate the current dosage regimens. A PK hospital-based study was conducted. Current dosage recommendations were used for children up to 16 years of age. Thirty-nine children were recruited. Serum samples were collected at the first dose interval (1, 3, 6, and 24 h) and at steady state. A standard 2-compartment PK model was developed, followed by structural models that incorporated weight. Weight was allowed to affect clearance (CL) using linear and allometric scaling terms. The linear model best accounted for the observed data and was subsequently chosen for Monte Carlo simulations. The PK parameter medians/means (standard deviation [SD]) were as follows: CL, [0.019/0.023 (0.01)] × weight liters/h/kg of body weight; volume, 2.282/4.138 liters (4.14 liters); first-order rate constant from the central to peripheral compartment (Kcp), 0.474/3.876 h(-1) (8.16 h(-1)); and first-order rate constant from peripheral to central compartment (Kpc), 0.292/3.994 h(-1) (8.93 h(-1)). The percentage of patients with a minimum concentration of drug in serum (Cmin) of <10 mg/liter was 53.85%. The median/mean (SD) total population area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was 619/527.05 mg · h/liter (166.03 mg · h/liter). Based on Monte Carlo simulations, only 30.04% (median AUC, 507.04 mg · h/liter), 44.88% (494.1 mg · h/liter), and 60.54% (452.03 mg · h/liter) of patients weighing 50, 25, and 10 kg, respectively, attained trough concentrations of >10 mg/liter by day 4 of treatment. The teicoplanin population PK is highly variable in children, with a wider AUC distribution spread than for adults. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be a routine requirement to minimize suboptimal concentrations. (This trial has been registered in the European Clinical Trials Database Registry [EudraCT] under registration number 2012-005738-12.).

SUBMITTER: Ramos-Martin V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4249354 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in children.

Ramos-Martín V V Paulus S S Siner S S Scott E E Padmore K K Newland P P Drew R J RJ Felton T W TW Docobo-Pérez F F Pizer B B Pea F F Peak M M Turner M A MA Beresford M W MW Hope W W WW

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 20140915 11

Teicoplanin is frequently administered to treat Gram-positive infections in pediatric patients. However, not enough is known about the pharmacokinetics (PK) of teicoplanin in children to justify the optimal dosing regimen. The aim of this study was to determine the population PK of teicoplanin in children and evaluate the current dosage regimens. A PK hospital-based study was conducted. Current dosage recommendations were used for children up to 16 years of age. Thirty-nine children were recruit ...[more]

PMID: 25224001

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objectives: The pharmacokinetics (PK) of teicoplanin differs in children compared with adults. Our aim was to determine the PK of teicoplanin in an Asian pediatric population and to optimize dosage regimens. Methods: This was a retrospective PK study and all the data were collected from hospitalized children. We developed a population PK model using sparse data, and Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the ability of standard teicoplanin regimen and other different dosage regimens. The optimal dosing regimens were defined as achieving the target trough concentration (C min) of 10 mg/L and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD, [AUC24/MIC]) of 125 for moderate infection. For severe infection, the optimal dosing regimens were defined as achieving the target 15 mg/L and AUC24/MIC of 345. Results: 159 children were included and 1.5 samples/children on average were provided. Estimated clearance of teicoplanin was 0.694 L/h (0.784/L/h/70 kg) and volume of distribution was 1.39 L. Teicoplanin standard loading dose was adequate for moderate infection, while 13 mg/kg was needed for severer infection. With standard maintenance doses, both patients with moderate and severe infection failed to achieve the target C min. 12 and 16 mg/kg/day were required to achieve a C min ≥ 10 and 15 mg/L, respectively. However, standard maintenance dose was adequate to achieve AUC24/MIC ≥ 125 for moderate infection, and 12 mg/kg/day was needed to achieve AUC24/MIC ≥ 345 for severe infection. Lower weight and serum creatinine were associated with higher dose. Conclusion: Optimal doses based on the target C min were higher than that based on the PK/PD target. To achieve the C min and PK/PD targets simultaneously, a standard loading dose was adequate for moderate infection based on simulation, while dosing higher than standard doses were required in other situation. Further clinical studies with rich sampling from children is required to confirm our findings.

Project description:Our objective was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model in order to evaluate the currently recommended dosing regimen in term and preterm neonates. By using an optimal design approach, a prospective PK study was designed and implemented in 60 neonates with postmenstrual ages (PMA) of 26 to 43 weeks. A loading dose of 16?mg/kg was administered at day 1, followed by a maintenance dose of 8?mg/kg daily. Plasma concentrations were quantified by high-pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Population PK (popPK) analysis was performed using NONMEM software. Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations were performed to evaluate currently recommended dosing based on a pharmacodynamic index of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC?ratio of ?400. A two-compartment model with linear elimination best described the data by the following equations: clearance (CL) = 0.0227 × (weight [wt]/1,765)0.75 × (estimated creatinine clearance [eCRCL]/22)0.672, central compartment volume of distribution (V1) = 0.283 (wt/1,765), intercompartmental clearance (Q) = 0.151 (wt/1,765)0.75, and peripheral compartment volume (V2) = 0.541 (wt/1,765). The interindividual variability estimates for CL, V1, and V2 were 36.5%, 45.7%, and 51.4%, respectively. Current weight (wt) and estimated creatinine clearance (eCRCL) significantly explained the observed variability. MC simulation demonstrated that, with the current dosing regimen, an AUC/MIC?ratio of ?400 was reached by only 68.5% of neonates with wt of <1 kg when the MIC?was equal to?1 mg/kg, versus 82.2%, 89.7%, and 92.7% of neonates with wt of 1 to <2, 2 to <3, or ?3?kg, respectively. Augmentation of a maintenance dose up to 10 or 11?mg/kg for preterm neonates with wt of 1 to <2 or <1?kg, respectively, increases the probability of reaching the therapeutic target; the recommended doses seem to be adequate for neonates with wt of ?2?kg. Teicoplanin PK are variable in neonates, with wt and eCRCL having the most significant impact. Neonates with wt of?<2 kg need higher doses, especially for Staphylococcus spp. with an MIC?value of ?1 mg/liter.

Dataset Information

Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in children.

Publications

Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in children.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets