Dataset Information

Extensive error in the number of genes inferred from draft genome assemblies.

ABSTRACT: Current sequencing methods produce large amounts of data, but genome assemblies based on these data are often woefully incomplete. These incomplete and error-filled assemblies result in many annotation errors, especially in the number of genes present in a genome. In this paper we investigate the magnitude of the problem, both in terms of total gene number and the number of copies of genes in specific families. To do this, we compare multiple draft assemblies against higher-quality versions of the same genomes, using several new assemblies of the chicken genome based on both traditional and next-generation sequencing technologies, as well as published draft assemblies of chimpanzee. We find that upwards of 40% of all gene families are inferred to have the wrong number of genes in draft assemblies, and that these incorrect assemblies both add and subtract genes. Using simulated genome assemblies of Drosophila melanogaster, we find that the major cause of increased gene numbers in draft genomes is the fragmentation of genes onto multiple individual contigs. Finally, we demonstrate the usefulness of RNA-Seq in improving the gene annotation of draft assemblies, largely by connecting genes that have been fragmented in the assembly process.

SUBMITTER: Denton JF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4256071 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Extensive error in the number of genes inferred from draft genome assemblies.

Denton James F JF Lugo-Martinez Jose J Tucker Abraham E AE Schrider Daniel R DR Warren Wesley C WC Hahn Matthew W MW

PLoS computational biology 20141204 12

Current sequencing methods produce large amounts of data, but genome assemblies based on these data are often woefully incomplete. These incomplete and error-filled assemblies result in many annotation errors, especially in the number of genes present in a genome. In this paper we investigate the magnitude of the problem, both in terms of total gene number and the number of copies of genes in specific families. To do this, we compare multiple draft assemblies against higher-quality versions of t ...[more]

PMID: 25474019

Similar Datasets

Project description:Genome assembly of short reads from large plant genomes remains a challenge in computational biology despite major developments in next generation sequencing. Of late several draft assemblies have been reported in sequenced plant genomes. The reported draft genome assemblies of Cajanus cajan have different levels of genome completeness, a large number of repeats, gaps, and segmental duplications. Draft assemblies with portions of genome missing are shorter than the referenced original genome. These assemblies come with low map accuracy affecting further functional annotation and the prediction of gene components as desired by crop researchers. Genome coverage, i.e., the number of sequenced raw reads mapped onto a certain location of the genome is an important quality indicator of completeness and assembly quality in draft assemblies. The present work aimed to improve the coverage in reported de novo sequenced draft genomes (GCA_000340665.1 and GCA_000230855.2) of pigeonpea, a legume widely cultivated in India. The two recently sequenced assemblies, A1 and A2 comprised 72% and 75% of the estimated coverage of the genome, respectively. We employed an assembly reconciliation approach to compare the draft assemblies and merge them, filling the gaps by employing an algorithm size sorting mate-pair library to generate a high quality and near complete assembly with enhanced contiguity. The majority of gaps present within scaffolds were filled with right-sized mate-pair reads. The improved assembly reduced the number of gaps than those reported in draft assemblies resulting in an improved genome coverage of 82.4%. Map accuracy of the improved assembly was evaluated using various quality metrics and for the presence of specific trait-related functional genes. Employed pair-end and mate-pair local libraries helped us to reduce gaps, repeats, and other sequence errors resulting in lengthier scaffolds compared to the two draft assemblies. We reported the prediction of putative host resistance genes against Fusarium wilt disease by their performance and evaluated them both in wet laboratory and field phenotypic conditions.

Dataset Information

Extensive error in the number of genes inferred from draft genome assemblies.

Publications

Extensive error in the number of genes inferred from draft genome assemblies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets