Dataset Information

Validation of disability status, a claims-based measure of functional status for cancer treatment and outcomes studies.

ABSTRACT: In prior research, we developed a claims-based prediction model for poor patient disability status (DS), a proxy measure for performance status, commonly used by oncologists to summarize patient functional status and assess ability of a patient to tolerate aggressive treatment. In this study, we implemented and validated the DS measure in 4 cohorts of cancer patients: early and advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), stage IV estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancer, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).SEER-Medicare data (1999-2007) for the 4 cohorts of cancer patients. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression tested the association of the DS measure with designated cancer-directed treatments: early NSCLC (surgery), advanced NSCLC (chemotherapy), stage IV ER- breast cancer (chemotherapy), and MDS (erythropoiesis-stimulating agents). Treatment model fit was compared across model iterations.In both unadjusted and adjusted results, predicted poor DS was strongly associated with a lower likelihood of cancer treatment receipt in all 4 cohorts [early NSCLC (N=20,280), advanced NSCLC (N=31,341), stage IV ER- breast cancer (N=1519), and MDS (N=6058)] independent of other patient, contextual, and disease characteristics, as well as the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Inclusion of the DS measure into models already controlling for other variables did not significantly improve model fit across the cohorts.The DS measure is a significant independent predictor of cancer-directed treatment. Small changes in model fit associated with both DS and the Charlson Comorbidity Index suggest that unobserved factors continue to play a role in determining cancer treatments.

SUBMITTER: Davidoff AJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4256940 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Validation of disability status, a claims-based measure of functional status for cancer treatment and outcomes studies.

Davidoff Amy J AJ Gardner Lisa D LD Zuckerman Ilene H IH Hendrick Franklin F Ke Xuehua X Edelman Martin J MJ

Medical care 20140601 6

<h4>Background</h4>In prior research, we developed a claims-based prediction model for poor patient disability status (DS), a proxy measure for performance status, commonly used by oncologists to summarize patient functional status and assess ability of a patient to tolerate aggressive treatment. In this study, we implemented and validated the DS measure in 4 cohorts of cancer patients: early and advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), stage IV estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cance ...[more]

PMID: 24638118

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPrevious neck-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have tended to measure both symptoms and disability. This multi-staged study developed and evaluated a neck-specific PROM focusing on functional disability.MethodsThis study integrated findings from systematic reviews on neck-specific outcome measures, patient interviews, qualitative studies on neck disability, and iterative item testing to develop a 10-item measure of neck-related disability (ND10). Content validity was assessed by classifying items using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and perspective linking. Patients (n = 78) with neck pain completed cognitive interviews, exploring items of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and ND10, and completed structured questions related to literacy and relevance. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland Altman graphs, and Cronbach's alpha. Concurrent convergent validity was evaluated by comparing the ND10 to the NDI, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). Known group validity was determined by comparing ND10 scores from patients, who rated their neck as more or less than 1/2 of "normal" on the SANE, using t-tests.ResultsThe ND10 requires respondents to make rational judgements about their neck-related body function and disability. It has high internal consistency (0.94) and re-test reliability (0.87; SEM = 3.2/100; MDC = 7.5); and no re-test bias (mean re-test difference of 0.6). It followed expected correlation patterns, being highly correlated with related multi-item PROMs (r = 0.85-0.91), and moderately correlated to the single-item SANE. More patients agreed that the ND10 was easily readable than did so for the NDI (84% vs 68%; p < 0.05). All the PROMs distinguished the patients who perceived themselves as being abnormal/normal defined by a dichotomized SANE (p < 0.01).ConclusionThe ND10 is reliable and valid for measuring neck-related functional disability. Longitudinal and cross-cultural translation studies are needed to support future use.

Project description:BackgroundAdministrative healthcare claims data provide a mechanism for assessing and monitoring multiple sclerosis (MS) disease status across large, clinically representative "real-world" populations. The estimation of MS disease status using administrative claims can be a challenge, however, due to a lack of detailed clinical information. Retrospective claims analyses in MS have traditionally used rates of MS relapses to approximate disease status. Healthcare costs may be alternate, broader claims-based indicators of disease activity because costs reflect multiple facets of care of patients with MS, and there is a strong correlation between quality of life of patients with MS and costs of the disease. This study developed, tested, and validated a healthcare cost-based measure to serve as an indicator of overall disease status in patients with MS treated with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) utilizing administrative claims.MethodsUsing IMS Health Real World Data Adjudicated Claims - US data (January 2006-June 2013), a negative binomial regression predicted annual all-cause medical costs. Coefficients reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05) and increasing costs by ?5% were selected for inclusion into an MS-specific severity score (scale of 0 to 100). Components of the score included rehabilitation services, altered mental state, pain, disability, stiffness, balance disorder, urinary incontinence, numbness, malaise/fatigue, and infections. Coefficient weights represented each predictor's contribution. The predictive model was derived using 50% of a random sample and tested/validated using the remaining 50%.ResultsAverage overall predicted annual total medical cost was $11,134 (development sample, n = 11,384, vs. $10,528 actual) and $11,303 (validation sample, n = 11,385, vs. $10,620 actual). The model had consistent bias (approximately +$600 or +6% of actual costs) for both samples. In the validation sample, mean MS disease status scores were 0.24, 8.95, and 21.77 for low, medium, and high tertiles, respectively. Mean costs were most accurately predicted among less severe patients ($5243 predicted vs. $5233 actual cost for lowest tertile).ConclusionThe algorithm developed in this study provides an initial step to helping understand and potentially predict cost changes for a commercially insured MS population.

Project description:BackgroundThe Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) quantifies disability and measures disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), however is not available in administrative claims databases.ObjectivesTo develop a claims-based algorithm for deriving EDSS and validate it against a clinical dataset capturing true EDSS values from medical records.MethodsWe built a unique linked dataset combining claims data from the German AOK PLUS sickness fund and medical records from the Multiple Sclerosis Management System 3D (MSDS3D). Data were deterministically linked based on insurance numbers. We used 69 MS-related diagnostic indicators recorded with ICD-10-GM codes within 3 months before and after recorded true EDSS measures to estimate a claims-based EDSS proxy (pEDSS). Predictive performance of the pEDSS was assessed as an eight-fold (EDSS 1.0-7.0, ≥8.0), three-fold (EDSS 1.0-3.0, 4.0-5.0, ≥6.0), and binary classifier (EDSS <6.0, ≥6.0). For each classifier, predictive performance measures were determined, and overall performance was summarized using a macro F1-score. Finally, we implemented the algorithm to determine pEDSS among an overall cohort of patients with MS in AOK PLUS, who were alive and insured 12 months prior to and after index diagnosis.ResultsWe recruited 100 people with MS insured by AOK PLUS who had ≥1 EDSS measure in MSDS3D between 01/10/2015 and 30/06/2019 (620 measurements overall). Patients had a mean rescaled EDSS of 3.2 and pEDSS of 3.0. The pEDSS deviated from the true EDSS by 1.2 points, resulting in a mean squared error of prediction of 2.6. For the eight-fold classifier, the macro F1-score of 0.25 indicated low overall predictive performance. Broader severity groupings were better performing, with the three-fold and binary classifiers for severe disability achieving a F1-score of 0.68 and 0.84, respectively. In the overall AOK PLUS cohort (3,756 patients, 71.9% female, mean 51.9 years), older patients, patients with progressive forms of MS and those with higher comorbidity burden showed higher pEDSS.ConclusionGenerally, EDSS was underestimated by the algorithm as mild-to-moderate symptoms were poorly captured in claims across all functional systems. While the proxy-based approach using claims data may not allow for granular description of MS disability, broader severity groupings show good predictive performance.

Dataset Information

Validation of disability status, a claims-based measure of functional status for cancer treatment and outcomes studies.

Publications

Validation of disability status, a claims-based measure of functional status for cancer treatment and outcomes studies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets