Dataset Information

Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after transplantation: a network meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Graft-versus-host Disease (GvHD) prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is an ongoing effort but relative effects of different policies are not systematically explored.

Methods

We systematically reviewed 30-year evidence on GvHD prophylaxis and quantified the relative effect of different policies using a network meta-analysis. We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library for randomized studies on the topic. The primary outcome of interest was grade II-IV acute GvHD over 0 or I (with odds ratio OR <1 denoting benefit).

Findings

Thirty-three eligible studies that enrolled 3,440 patients (published up to June 2014), provided data on seven immunosuppressive drugs namely cyclosporin A (CsA), methotrexate (MTX), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus, sirolimus or corticosteroids and their combinations to calculate 14 direct and 21 indirect effects. The majority of trials (32/33) referred to myeloablative conditioning and sibling transplants (25/33). Tacrolimus/MTX (OR 0.44; 95% 0.27-0.70, number needed to treat to benefit, i.e. to avert a case of II-IV GvHD, NNTB = 5) and ATG/CsA/MTX (OR 0.45; 95%CI 0.26-0.78; NNTB = 5) were superior over CsA/MTX. ATG/CsA/MTX did not differ from tacrolimus/MTX (indirect evidence). Sirolimus-based prophylaxis outperformed CsA/MTX (OR 0.10; 95%CI 0.02-0.49, NNTB = 4) and marginally outperformed tacrolimus/MTX (OR 0.22; 95%CI 0.05-1.11). Add-on corticosteroids had no benefit over CsA/MTX.

Conclusions

Tacrolimus/MTX and ATG/CsA/MTX were the outperformers over CsA/MTX, but sirolimus-based regimens showed also potential. More randomized data are needed for reduced-intensity conditioning, as well as for MMF and sirolimus-containing regimens.

SUBMITTER: Ziakas PD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4259365 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after transplantation: a network meta-analysis.

Ziakas Panayiotis D PD Zervou Fainareti N FN Zacharioudakis Ioannis M IM Mylonakis Eleftherios E

PloS one 20141208 12

<h4>Background</h4>Graft-versus-host Disease (GvHD) prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is an ongoing effort but relative effects of different policies are not systematically explored.<h4>Methods</h4>We systematically reviewed 30-year evidence on GvHD prophylaxis and quantified the relative effect of different policies using a network meta-analysis. We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library for randomized studies on the topic. The primary outcome of inte ...[more]

PMID: 25485632

Similar Datasets

Project description:Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is major cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Ixazomib is an oral, second-generation, proteasome inhibitor that has been shown in preclinical models to prevent GVHD. We conducted a phase I/II trial in 57 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ixazomib administration for cGVHD prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic HCT. Oral ixazomib was administered on a weekly basis for a total of 4 doses, beginning days +60 through +90, to recipients of matched related donor (MRD, n = 25) or matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 26) allogeneic HCT in phase II portion of the study, once the recommended phase II dose of 4 mg was identified in phase I (n = 6). All patients received peripheral blood graft and standard GVHD prophylaxis of tacrolimus and methotrexate. Ixazomib administration was safe and well tolerated, with thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, gastrointestinal complaints, and fatigue the most common adverse events (>10%). In phase II (n = 51), the cumulative incidence of cGVHD at 1 year was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19% to 54%) in the MRD cohort and 39% (95% CI, 21% to 56%) in the MUD cohort. One-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse was 0% and 20% (95% CI, 8% to 36%) in the MRD cohort, respectively. In the MUD cohort, the respective NRM and relapse rates were 4% (0% to 16%) and 34% (17% to 52%). The outcomes on the study were compared post hoc with contemporaneous matched Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) controls. This post hoc analysis showed no significant improvement in cGVHD rates in both the MRD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85, P = .64) or MUD cohorts (HR = 0.68, P = .26) on the study compared with CIBMTR controls. B cell activating factor plasma levels were significantly higher after ixazomib dosing in those who remained cGVHD free compared with those developed cGVHD. This study shows that the novel strategy of short-course oral ixazomib following allogeneic HCT is safe but did not demonstrate significant improvement in cGVHD incidence in recipients of MRD and MUD transplantation compared with matched CIBMTR controls. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02250300.

Project description:BackgroundGraft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is the main life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Thirty to 80% of GvHD patients do not respond to first-line treatment and a second-line treatment is not universally established. Based on their immunomodulatory properties, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) have been proposed for the prevention and the treatment of GvHD in patients undergoing HSCT. Unfortunately, previous studies reported conflicting results regarding the prophylactic and therapeutic effects of MSC for GvHD. Consequently, we carried out a meta-analysis to clarify whether MSC administration can improve the dismal outcome of these patients.MethodsWe carried out a systematic review and selected studies (2004-2019) reporting data about the administration of allogeneic MSC for the prevention (n = 654 patients) or treatment of acute (n = 943 patients) or chronic (n = 76 patients) GvHD after HSCT. Our primary outcome was overall survival at the last follow-up. The secondary outcomes were the response and development of GvHD. Subgroup analyses included age, MSC dose, first infusion day after HSCT, number of organs and organ-specific involvement, acute GvHD grade (I-IV), and chronic GvHD grade (limited or extensive).ResultsPatients infused with MSC for GvHD prophylaxis showed a 17% increased overall survival (95% CI, 1.02-1.33) and a reduced incidence of acute GvHD grade IV (RR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.81) and chronic GvHD (RR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.88) compared with controls. Overall survival of acute GvHD patients (0.50; 95% CI, 0.41-0.59) was positively correlated with MSC dose (P = 0.0214). The overall response was achieved in 67% (95% CI, 0.61-0.74) and was complete in 39% (95% CI, 0.31-0.48) of acute patients. Organ-specific response was higher for the skin. Twenty-two percent (95% CI, 0.16-0.29) of acute patients infused with MSC developed chronic GvHD. Sixty-four percent (95% CI, 0.47-0.80) of chronic patients infused with MSC survived; the overall response was 66% (95% CI, 0.55-0.76) and was complete in 23% (95% CI 0.12-0.34) of patients.ConclusionsOur meta-analysis indicates that allogeneic MSC could be instrumental for the prophylaxis and treatment of GvHD. Future trials should investigate the effect of the administration of MSC as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of patients with GvHD from the onset of the disease.

Dataset Information

Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after transplantation: a network meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Findings

Conclusions

Publications

Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after transplantation: a network meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets