Dataset Information

Dacarbazine combined targeted therapy versus dacarbazine alone in patients with malignant melanoma: a meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Malignant melanoma is the most aggressive and deadly form of skin cancer. Dacarbazine (DTIC) has been the approved first-line treatment for metastatic melanoma in routine clinical practice. However, response rates with single-agent DTIC are low. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of DTIC with or without placebo and DTIC-based combination therapies in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma.

Methods

We searched from electronic databases such as The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EBSCO, EMBASE, Ovid, CNKI, and CBMDisc from 2003 to 2013. The primary outcome measures were overall response and 1-year survival, and the secondary outcome measurements were adverse events.

Results

Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2,481 patients were included in the meta-analysis. DTIC-based combination therapies was superior to DTIC alone in overall response (combined risk ratio [RR] ?=?1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-2.01) and 1-year survival (combined RR?=?1.26, 95% CI: 1.14-1.39). Patients with DTIC-based combination therapies had higher incidence of adverse events including nausea (combined RR?=?1.23, 95% CI: 1.10-1.36), vomiting (combined RR?=?1.73, 95% CI: 1.41-2.12) and neutropenia (combined RR?=?1.75, 95% CI: 1.42-2.16) compared to the group for DTIC alone.

Conclusion

These data suggested that DTIC-based combination therapies could moderately improve the overall response and the 1-year survival but increased the incidence of adverse events. Further large-scale, high-quality, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

SUBMITTER: Jiang G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4263472 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Dacarbazine combined targeted therapy versus dacarbazine alone in patients with malignant melanoma: a meta-analysis.

Jiang Guan G Li Rong-Hua RH Sun Chao C Liu Yan-Qun YQ Zheng Jun-Nian JN

PloS one 20141211 12

<h4>Background</h4>Malignant melanoma is the most aggressive and deadly form of skin cancer. Dacarbazine (DTIC) has been the approved first-line treatment for metastatic melanoma in routine clinical practice. However, response rates with single-agent DTIC are low. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of DTIC with or without placebo and DTIC-based combination therapies in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched from electronic databases ...[more]

PMID: 25502446

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence whether the benefit of adding angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors outweighs the increased risk of adverse effects in patients with heart failure. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Two independent reviewers searched and abstracted randomized controlled trials of ARBs and ACE inhibitors compared to ACE inhibitor therapy alone in patients with heart failure reporting mortality and hospitalizations having a follow-up of at least 6 months identified by a systematic literature search. Eight trials including a total of 18,061 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. There was no difference between patients treated with combination therapy and ACE inhibitor therapy alone for overall mortality, hospitalization for any reason, fatal or nonfatal MI. Combination therapy was, however, associated with fewer hospital admissions for heart failure (RR 0.81, 95%CI 0.72-0.91), although there was significant heterogeneity across trials (p-value for heterogeneity = 0.04; I(2) = 57% [95%CI 0-83%]). Patients treated with combination therapy had a higher risk of worsening renal function and symptomatic hypotension, and their trial medications were more often permanently discontinued. Lack of individual patient data precluded the analysis of time-to-event data and identification of subgroups which potentially benefit more from combination therapy such as younger patients with preserved renal function and thus at lower risk to experience worsening renal function or hyperkalemia. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Combination therapy with ARBs and ACE inhibitors reduces admissions for heart failure in patients with congestive heart failure when compared to ACE inhibitor therapy alone, but does not reduce overall mortality or all-cause hospitalization and is associated with more adverse events. Thus, based on current evidence, combination therapy with ARBs and ACE inhibitors may be reserved for patients who remain symptomatic on therapy with ACE inhibitors under strict monitoring for any signs of worsening renal function and/or symptomatic hypotension.

Dataset Information

Dacarbazine combined targeted therapy versus dacarbazine alone in patients with malignant melanoma: a meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Dacarbazine combined targeted therapy versus dacarbazine alone in patients with malignant melanoma: a meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets