Dataset Information

A randomized trial of peer-delivered self-management support for hypertension.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Peer-led interventions to improve chronic disease self-management can improve health outcomes but are not widely used. Therefore, we tested a peer-led hypertension self-management intervention delivered at regular meetings of community veterans' organizations. METHODS:We randomized 58 organizational units ("posts") of veterans' organizations in southeast Wisconsin to peer-led vs. professionally delivered self-management education. Volunteer peer leaders at peer-led posts delivered monthly presentations regarding hypertension self-management during regular post meetings. Volunteer post representatives at seminar posts encouraged post members to attend 3 didactic seminars delivered by health professionals at a time separate from the post meeting. Volunteers in both groups encouraged members to self-monitor using blood pressure cuffs, weight scales, and pedometers. Our primary outcome was change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 12 months. RESULTS:We measured SBP in 404 participants at baseline and in 379 participants at 12 months. SBP decreased significantly (4.4mm Hg; P < 0.0001) overall; the decrease was similar in peer-led and seminar posts (3.5mm Hg vs. 5.4mm Hg; P = 0.24). Among participants with uncontrolled BP at baseline, SBP decreased by 10.1mm Hg from baseline to 12 months but was again similar in the 2 groups. This pattern was also seen at 6 months and with diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS:Our peer-led educational intervention was not more effective than didactic seminars for SBP control. Although peer-led educational programs have had important impacts in a number of studies, we did not find our intervention superior to a similar intervention delivered by healthcare professionals. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00571038.

SUBMITTER: Whittle J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4263938 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A randomized trial of peer-delivered self-management support for hypertension.

Whittle Jeff J Schapira Marilyn M MM Fletcher Kathlyn E KE Hayes Avery A Morzinski Jeffrey J Laud Purushottam P Eastwood Dan D Ertl Kristyn K Patterson Leslie L Mosack Katie E KE

American journal of hypertension 20140422 11

<h4>Background</h4>Peer-led interventions to improve chronic disease self-management can improve health outcomes but are not widely used. Therefore, we tested a peer-led hypertension self-management intervention delivered at regular meetings of community veterans' organizations.<h4>Methods</h4>We randomized 58 organizational units ("posts") of veterans' organizations in southeast Wisconsin to peer-led vs. professionally delivered self-management education. Volunteer peer leaders at peer-led post ...[more]

PMID: 24755206

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportancePatients coping with rare diseases need psychosocial support.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of a brief, transdiagnostic, peer-delivered intervention for patients with rare diseases in addition to care as usual (CAU) compared with CAU only.Design, setting, and participantsIn this 2-group randomized clinical trial conducted from October 5, 2017, to July 12, 2019, patients were recruited via specialized clinics and patient organizations across Germany and participated from home. The study included consecutive adult patients with neurofibromatosis type 1, Marfan syndrome, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and pulmonary arterial hypertension who have limited functionality because of the disease. Exclusion criteria were a life-threatening health status and ongoing psychotherapeutic treatment. Of 143 patients screened for eligibility with a semistructured telephone interview, 54 were excluded, and 89 were randomized: 45 patients were randomly allocated to the peer-delivered intervention group, and 44 to the control group; 87 patients (98%) completed the 6-month follow-up assessment. The analysis was performed using an intention-to-treat principle. Data cleansing and analysis were conducted between April 25, 2019, and February 13, 2020.InterventionsThe 6-week intervention consisted of a self-help book and telephone-based peer counseling in addition to CAU. The control group received CAU alone. Peer counselors received training, structured consultation guidelines, and supervision.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was acceptance of the disease as assessed using the Illness Cognition Questionnaire (ICQ; mean sum scores range from 0 to 18, with higher values representing more acceptance) 6 months after the intervention. Secondary outcomes included self-reported coping strategies (Health Education Impact Questionnaire), illness cognition (ICQ and Illness Perception Questionnaire), depression severity (Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale), anxiety severity (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale), quality of life (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey), and social support (Social Support Questionnaire). Outcomes were assessed before the intervention, after the intervention, and at a 6-month follow-up.ResultsThe mean (SD) age of the 89 participating patients was 46.3 (14.9) years; 59 (66%) were women. There were no group differences regarding baseline variables. All patients allocated to the intervention group completed the intervention. Six months after the intervention, but not directly after completing the program, the intervention group had significantly higher rates of acceptance (ICQ) of the disease (primary outcome) compared with the CAU group. Mean (SD) baseline ICQ scores were 9.61 (3.79) in the control group and 9.86 (3.40) in the intervention group. Mean (SE) ICQ scores at 6 months were 10.32 (0.42) for the control group and 11.79 (0.42) for the intervention group, with a significant mean difference of -1.47 (95% CI, -2.63 to -0.31; P = .01). Several secondary outcomes, including different coping strategies, social support, and mental quality of life, were significantly higher after the intervention compared with the control group.Conclusions and relevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, a self-help and peer counseling intervention improved patients' acceptance of their rare chronic diseases. Self-management and peer support can efficiently address the unique care needs of patients with rare diseases.Trial registrationisrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN13738704.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Resource barriers complicate diabetes care management. Support from peers may help patients manage their diabetes. OBJECTIVE:To compare a reciprocal peer-support (RPS) program with nurse care management (NCM). DESIGN:Randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00320112) SETTING:2 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care facilities. PATIENTS:244 men with hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels greater than 7.5% during the previous 6 months. MEASUREMENTS:The primary outcome was 6-month change in HbA(1c) level. Secondary outcomes were changes in insulin therapy; blood pressure; and patient reports of medication adherence, diabetes-related support, and emotional distress. INTERVENTION:Patients in the RPS group attended an initial group session to set diabetes-related behavioral goals, receive peer communication skills training, and be paired with another age-matched peer patient. Peers were encouraged to talk weekly using a telephone platform that recorded call occurrence and provided reminders to promote peer contact. These patients could also participate in optional group sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months. Patients in the NCM group attended a 1.5-hour educational session and were assigned to a nurse care manager. RESULTS:Of the 244 patients enrolled, 216 (89%) completed the HbA(1c) assessments and 231 (95%) completed the survey assessments at 6 months. Mean HbA(1c) level decreased from 8.02% to 7.73% (change, -0.29%) in the RPS group and increased from 7.93% to 8.22% (change, 0.29%) in the NCM group. The difference in HbA(1c) change between groups was 0.58% (P = 0.004). Among patients with a baseline HbA(1c) level greater than 8.0%, those in the RPS group had a mean decrease of 0.88%, compared with a 0.07% decrease among those in the NCM group (between-group difference, 0.81%; P < 0.001). Eight patients in the RPS group started insulin therapy, compared with 1 patient in the NCM group (P = 0.020). Groups did not differ in blood pressure, self-reported medication adherence, or diabetes-specific distress, but the RPS group reported improvement in diabetes social support. LIMITATION:The study included only male veterans and lasted only 6 months. CONCLUSION:Reciprocal peer support holds promise as a method for diabetes care management.

Project description:BackgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE or lupus) is a chronic autoimmune disease that is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, healthcare costs and decreased quality of life. African Americans in the USA have three to four times greater prevalence of SLE, risk of developing SLE at an earlier age, and SLE-related disease activity, damage, and mortality compared with Caucasians, with the highest rates experienced by African American women. There is strong evidence that patient-level factors are associated with outcomes, which justifies targeting them with intervention. While evidence-based self-management interventions that incorporate both social support and health education have reduced pain, improved function, and delayed disability among patients with SLE, African Americans and women are still disproportionately impacted by SLE. Peer mentoring interventions are effective in other chronic conditions that disproportionately affect minorities, such as diabetes mellitus, HIV, and kidney disease, but there is currently no empirically tested peer mentoring intervention developed for patients with SLE. Preliminary data from our group suggest that peer mentoring improves self-management, reduces disease activity, and improves health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in African American women with SLE.MethodsThis study will test an innovative, manualized peer mentorship program designed to provide modeling and reinforcement by peers (mentors) to other African American women with SLE (mentees) to encourage them to engage in activities that promote disease self-management. Through a randomized, "mentored" or "support group" controlled design, we will assess the efficacy and mechanism(s) of this intervention in self-management, disease activity, and HRQOL.DiscussionThis is the first study to test peer mentorship as an alternative strategy to improve outcomes in African American women with SLE. This could result in a model for other programs that aim to improve disease self-management, disease activity, and HRQOL in African American women suffering from chronic illness. The peer mentoring approach is uniquely fitted to African Americans, and this intervention has the potential to lead to health improvements for African American women with SLE that have not been attainable with other interventions. This would significantly reduce disparities and have considerable public health impact.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03734055 . Registered on 27 November 2018.

Project description:ImportanceLower back pain (LBP) is a prevalent and challenging condition in primary care. The effectiveness of an individually tailored self-management support tool delivered via a smartphone app has not been rigorously tested.ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of selfBACK, an evidence-based, individually tailored self-management support system delivered through an app as an adjunct to usual care for adults with LBP-related disability.Design, setting, and participantsThis randomized clinical trial with an intention-to-treat data analysis enrolled eligible individuals who sought care for LBP in a primary care or an outpatient spine clinic in Denmark and Norway from March 8 to December 14, 2019. Participants were 18 years or older, had nonspecific LBP, scored 6 points or higher on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and had a smartphone and access to email.InterventionsThe selfBACK app provided weekly recommendations for physical activity, strength and flexibility exercises, and daily educational messages. Self-management recommendations were tailored to participant characteristics and symptoms. Usual care included advice or treatment offered to participants by their clinician.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcome was the mean difference in RMDQ scores between the intervention group and control group at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included average and worst LBP intensity levels in the preceding week as measured on the numerical rating scale, ability to cope as assessed with the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, fear-avoidance belief as assessed by the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, cognitive and emotional representations of illness as assessed by the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, health-related quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire, physical activity level as assessed by the Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale, and overall improvement as assessed by the Global Perceived Effect scale. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months.ResultsA total of 461 participants were included in the analysis; the population had a mean [SD] age of 47.5 [14.7] years and included 255 women (55%). Of these participants, 232 were randomized to the intervention group and 229 to the control group. By the 3-month follow-up, 399 participants (87%) had completed the trial. The adjusted mean difference in RMDQ score between the 2 groups at 3 months was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.06-1.51; P = .03), favoring the selfBACK intervention. The percentage of participants who reported a score improvement of at least 4 points on the RMDQ was 52% in the intervention group vs 39% in the control group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.15-2.70; P = .01).Conclusions and relevanceAmong adults who sought care for LBP in a primary care or an outpatient spine clinic, those who used the selfBACK system as an adjunct to usual care had reduced pain-related disability at 3 months. The improvement in pain-related disability was small and of uncertain clinical significance. Process evaluation may provide insights into refining the selfBACK app to increase its effectiveness.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03798288.

Project description:BackgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of hospitalization and death around the world. The prevalence of CVD is increasing and, therefore, development and investigation of effective programs to help people better self-manage their CVD and prevent secondary complications are needed.ObjectiveIn this paper, we report on a protocol to evaluate Healing Circles-an evidence-based and patient-informed peer support mobile health program designed to facilitate self-management and support patients in their recovery from and management of CVD. We hypothesize that individuals with CVD who use Healing Circles will experience greater improvements to their self-management ability than individuals receiving usual care.MethodsIn this single-blinded (assessor) randomized controlled trial, 250 community-living individuals with CVD will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to either Healing Circles or Usual Care. The primary outcome of self-management will be measured using the Health Education Impact Questionnaire version 3.0. Secondary outcomes include self-efficacy with chronic disease management, health-related quality of life, health resource use and costs, and electronic health literacy. Measurements will be taken at the baseline and every 6 months for 24 months.ResultsThe study started recruitment in September 2017. Individuals are currently being recruited for participation, and existing participants are currently on follow-up. Measurements will be taken every 6 months until the study end, which is anticipated in December 2019.ConclusionsHealing Circles is a novel program aimed toward improving self-management through peer support. Given our real-world study design, our findings will be readily translatable into practice. If the results support our hypothesis, it will indicate that Healing Circles is an effective intervention for improving self-management and reducing health care use.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03159325; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03159325 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/74DvxVKUd).International registered report identifier (irrid)DERR1-10.2196/12322.

Dataset Information

A randomized trial of peer-delivered self-management support for hypertension.

Publications

A randomized trial of peer-delivered self-management support for hypertension.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets