Dataset Information

Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Palivizumab Liquid Formulation Compared with Lyophilized Formulation.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of liquid palivizumab compared with lyophilized palivizumab. METHODS:This phase 2, randomized, double-blind crossover study included premature infants aged ?6 months born ?35 weeks gestational age. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single 15 mg/kg intramuscular dose of liquid (sequence A group) or lyophilized (sequence B group) palivizumab on Day 0. Patients crossed over to receive the alternate formulation on Day 30. Serum palivizumab and antidrug antibody (ADA) levels were measured on Day 0 (predose), Day 30 (before the dose of alternate formulation), and Day 60 (30 days after the dose of alternate formulation). Patients were followed for safety through Day 60 (30 days after the dose of alternate formulation). RESULTS:A total of 153 infants were randomized into the study (sequence A 75; sequence B 78). Sequence A and sequence B trough serum palivizumab levels were similar on Day 30 (51.7 and 49.1 µg/mL, respectively) and Day 60 (84.8 and 87.2 µg/mL, respectively). The ratio of the geometric means using both Day 30 and Day 60 serum concentrations was 1.040 (90% CI 0.998-1.083), which was within the prespecified bioequivalence range of 0.8-1.25. Adverse events (AEs) were similar between the palivizumab liquid and lyophilized groups and within each treatment sequence. Serious AEs (SAEs) were experienced by 3% of infants in both liquid palivizumab and lyophilized palivizumab groups. None of the SAEs were determined to be related to study drug. Among the 124 infants (81% of total) evaluated for ADA, 2 (1.6%) tested positive for ADA at Day 60 (1 in each of sequence A and B). CONCLUSION:Liquid and lyophilized formulations of palivizumab were bioequivalent with similar safety profiles in infants.

SUBMITTER: Robbie GJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4269619 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Palivizumab Liquid Formulation Compared with Lyophilized Formulation.

Robbie Gabriel J GJ Makari Doris D Harris Brian B Losonsky Genevieve A GA Jafri Hasan S HS

Infectious diseases and therapy 20140930 2

<h4>Objective</h4>To assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of liquid palivizumab compared with lyophilized palivizumab.<h4>Methods</h4>This phase 2, randomized, double-blind crossover study included premature infants aged ≤6 months born ≤35 weeks gestational age. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single 15 mg/kg intramuscular dose of liquid (sequence A group) or lyophilized (sequence B group) palivizumab on Day 0. Patients crossed over to receive the alternate formulation on ...[more]

PMID: 25269648

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectiveThere is no licensed treatment for refractory chronic cough; off-label therapies have limited efficacy and can produce adverse effects. Excessive adenosine triphosphate signaling via P2X3 receptors is implicated in refractory chronic cough, and selective P2X3 receptor antagonists such as eliapixant (BAY 1817080) are under investigation. The objective of the study was to investigate the safety and tolerability of ascending repeated oral doses of eliapixant in healthy volunteers.MethodsWe conducted a repeated-dose, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 47 healthy male individuals. Subjects received repeated twice-daily ascending oral doses of eliapixant (10, 50, 200, and 750 mg) or placebo for 2 weeks. The primary outcome was frequency and severity of adverse events. Other outcomes included pharmacokinetics and evaluation of taste disturbances, which have occurred with the less selective P2X3 receptor antagonist gefapixant.ResultsPeak plasma concentrations of eliapixant were reached 3-4 h after administration of the first and subsequent doses. With multiple dosing, steady-state plasma concentrations were reached after ~ 6 days, and plasma concentrations predicted to achieve ≥ 80% P2X3 receptor occupancy (the level required for efficacy) were reached at 200 and 750 mg. Increases in plasma concentrations with increasing doses were less than dose proportional. After multiple dosing, mean plasma concentrations of eliapixant showed low peak-trough fluctuations and were similar for 200- and 750-mg doses. Eliapixant was well tolerated with a low incidence of taste-related adverse events.ConclusionsEliapixant (200 and 750 mg) produced plasma concentrations that cover the predicted therapeutic threshold over 24 h, with good safety and tolerability. These results enabled eliapixant to progress to clinical trials in patients with refractory chronic cough.Clinical trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT03310645 (initial registration: 16 October, 2017).

Project description:BackgroundRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important pathogen causing annual epidemics of bronchiolitis and pneumonia among infants worldwide. High-risk infants currently receive RSV prophylaxis with palivizumab, a humanized RSV monoclonal antibody (MAb). In preclinical in vitro and in vivo (cotton-rat model) studies, motavizumab, a new RSV MAb, was shown to have greater anti-RSV activity than palivizumab. Motavizumab is currently under review for licensing approval. Since both MAbs may be available concurrently, this study evaluated their safety and tolerability when administered sequentially during the same RSV season.MethodsBetween April 2006 and May 2006, 260 high-risk infants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive monthly intramuscular injections: 2 doses of motavizumab followed by 3 doses of palivizumab (M/P); 2 doses of palivizumab followed by 3 doses of motavizumab (P/M); or 5 doses of motavizumab (control). Adverse events (AEs, serious AEs [SAEs]), development of antidrug antibody (ADA), and serum drug trough concentrations were assessed.ResultsMost children received all 5 doses (246/260 [94.6%]) and completed the study (241/260 [92.7%]). While overall AE rates were similar (mostly level 1 or 2 in severity), SAEs and level 3 AEs occurred more frequently in the M/P group (SAEs: 22.9% M/P, 8.4% P/M, 11.8% motavizumab only; level 3 AEs: 15.7% M/P, 6.0% P/M, 6.5% motavizumab only). This trend in AE rates occurred before and after switching from motavizumab to palivizumab, suggesting a cause other than the combined regimen. Frequencies of AEs judged by the investigator to be related to study drug were similar among groups. Two deaths occurred on study (both in the M/P group, before palivizumab administration); neither was considered by the site investigator to be related to study drug. Mean serum drug trough concentrations were comparable among groups; ADA detection was infrequent (5.1% or less of any group).ConclusionsThe conclusions drawn from this study are limited by the small sample size per group. However, within this small study, overall AE rates, serum drug trough concentrations, and development of ADA associated with administering motavizumab and palivizumab sequentially to high-risk children appear comparable to administering motavizumab alone during the same RSV season.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT00316264.

Dataset Information

Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Palivizumab Liquid Formulation Compared with Lyophilized Formulation.

Publications

Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Palivizumab Liquid Formulation Compared with Lyophilized Formulation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets