Dataset Information

Oral contraceptive use and kidney cancer risk among women: evidence from a meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: Previous studies have investigated the relationship between oral contraceptives (OCs) use and kidney cancer risk. However, they yielded inconsistent results. To our knowledge, a comprehensive assessment of the association between OC and kidney cancer risk has not been reported. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the association. We identified all relevant studies up to July 2014 through a literature search of using PubMed and EMBASE, and by reviewing the references from the retrieved articles. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were used to estimate summary relative risks (SRRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 12 studies were eligible and included in this meta-analysis, involving 4,206 kidney cancer cases and 638,677 participants. The SRR of kidney cancer for ever versus never OC use was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.98). The protection became stronger when compared the longest duration of OC use with never use (RR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68-0.94). In dose-response analysis, we found that the kidney cancer risk decreased by 2% for per 1 year increment in OC use (RR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99). No apparent heterogeneity was observed across studies included in this analysis. Egger's and Begg's test also indicated no publication bias. The present study suggested that OC may reduce the risk of kidney cancer, especially for long-term users. More well-conducted and large-scale prospective studies are warranted to confirm the effects of OC use on kidney cancer.

SUBMITTER: Liu H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4276161 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Oral contraceptive use and kidney cancer risk among women: evidence from a meta-analysis.

Liu Huan H Wang Xing-Chun XC Hu Guang-Hui GH Huang Tian-Bao TB Xu Yun-Fei YF

International journal of clinical and experimental medicine 20141115 11

Previous studies have investigated the relationship between oral contraceptives (OCs) use and kidney cancer risk. However, they yielded inconsistent results. To our knowledge, a comprehensive assessment of the association between OC and kidney cancer risk has not been reported. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the association. We identified all relevant studies up to July 2014 through a literature search of using PubMed and EMBASE, and by reviewing the references from the retrieve ...[more]

PMID: 25550903

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Oral contraceptive (OCP) use might increase the risk of stroke in women. We examined a possible dose-response relation between OCP use and the risk of stroke in young and middle-aged women. Methods: A retrieval of PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed. We selected observational studies that reported odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of stroke in OCP users. A two-stage dose-response analysis was conducted using the random-effects model and the restricted spline model. Results: A total of 6 cohort studies and 12 case-control studies were included, which involved 2,143,174 participants and 11,661 cases of stroke including ischemic stroke (IS), hemorrhagic stroke (HS), and stroke of unknown origin. The pooled ORs of total stroke were 1.19 (95% CI, 1.16-1.23) for every 10-?g increment in estrogen dosage, 1.20 (95% CI, 1.05-1.37) for every 5-years increment in duration of OCP use, and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68-0.98) for every 5-years increment in duration of OCP cessation. The ORs of IS were 1.20 (95% CI, 1.17-1.22) in estrogen dosage, 1.24 (95% CI, 1.04-1.49) in duration of OCP use, and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.67-0.92) in duration of OCP cessation. The ORs of HS were 1.10 (95% CI, 1.04-1.16) in estrogen dosage, 1.13 (95% CI, 0.93-1.36) in duration of OCPs, and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.55-0.92) in duration of OCP cessation. The pooled ORs of total stroke from prospective studies (1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24) were lower than those from retrospective studies (1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.67). Conclusions: The higher estrogen dosage significantly increased the risks of total stroke, IS, and HS, respectively. The longer duration of OCP use significantly increased the risks of total stroke and IS, but its effects on HS risk were marginal. The longer duration of OCP cessation significantly decreased the risks of total stroke, IS, and HS, respectively. These findings affirm the contribution of estrogen dose and duration of OCP use to the increased risk of stroke, which may be critical for the instruction of OCP use and the prevention and management of cerebrovascular diseases.

Project description:BackgroundA lack of clarity exists regarding contraceptive uptake and counselling among women with cancer, despite these women having unique family planning needs. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature and produce an overall summary estimate of contraceptive use and counselling among women with cancer across the cancer care continuum.MethodsA systematic search of articles reporting on contraceptive counselling and/or contraceptive use among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) with cancer across the cancer care continuum (e.g. diagnosis, treatment, survivorship) was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care and Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers conducted the data screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Qualitative synthesis and meta-analyses were conducted to summarise the key findings.ResultsWe included 21 articles involving 3835 participants in this review. Studies varied according to the cancer population and time along the cancer care continuum it was assessed. Of the studies that reported the overall contraceptive prevalence among women diagnosed with cancer (n = 8), contraceptive use ranged from 25 to 92%. Of the four studies that focused on cancer survivors, the contraceptive prevalence ranged from 47 to 84%. When the prevalence of these studies was pooled, a crude summary prevalence of 64% (62% among women with cancer versus 68% among cancer survivors) was found. The rate of contraceptive counselling was assessed in ten studies. A pooled prevalence of 50% (44% among women with cancer versus 58% among cancer survivors) was found, with the prevalence ranging from 12 to 78% among individual studies depending on the point in the cancer care continuum that it was provided. When contraceptive counselling was provided, it was found to significantly increase contraceptive use although biases were identified in its application.ConclusionsContraceptive counselling interventions as part of standard cancer care have the potential to not only empower women with cancer and cancer survivors to make informed choices regarding their reproductive health but also provide the ability to plan future pregnancies for times of better health.

Dataset Information

Oral contraceptive use and kidney cancer risk among women: evidence from a meta-analysis.

Publications

Oral contraceptive use and kidney cancer risk among women: evidence from a meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets