Dataset Information

Benchmarking of optical dimerizer systems.

ABSTRACT: Optical dimerizers are a powerful new class of optogenetic tools that allow light-inducible control of protein-protein interactions. Such tools have been useful for regulating cellular pathways and processes with high spatiotemporal resolution in live cells, and a growing number of dimerizer systems are available. As these systems have been characterized by different groups using different methods, it has been difficult for users to compare their properties. Here, we set about to systematically benchmark the properties of four optical dimerizer systems, CRY2/CIB1, TULIPs, phyB/PIF3, and phyB/PIF6. Using a yeast transcriptional assay, we find significant differences in light sensitivity and fold-activation levels between the red light regulated systems but similar responses between the CRY2/CIB and TULIP systems. Further comparison of the ability of the CRY2/CIB1 and TULIP systems to regulate a yeast MAPK signaling pathway also showed similar responses, with slightly less background activity in the dark observed with CRY2/CIB. In the process of developing this work, we also generated an improved blue-light-regulated transcriptional system using CRY2/CIB in yeast. In addition, we demonstrate successful application of the CRY2/CIB dimerizers using a membrane-tethered CRY2, which may allow for better local control of protein interactions. Taken together, this work allows for a better understanding of the capacities of these different dimerization systems and demonstrates new uses of these dimerizers to control signaling and transcription in yeast.

SUBMITTER: Pathak GP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4277767 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Benchmarking of optical dimerizer systems.

Pathak Gopal P GP Strickland Devin D Vrana Justin D JD Tucker Chandra L CL

ACS synthetic biology 20141105 11

Optical dimerizers are a powerful new class of optogenetic tools that allow light-inducible control of protein-protein interactions. Such tools have been useful for regulating cellular pathways and processes with high spatiotemporal resolution in live cells, and a growing number of dimerizer systems are available. As these systems have been characterized by different groups using different methods, it has been difficult for users to compare their properties. Here, we set about to systematically ...[more]

PMID: 25350266

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn quantitative biology, mathematical models are used to describe and analyze biological processes. The parameters of these models are usually unknown and need to be estimated from experimental data using statistical methods. In particular, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods have become increasingly popular as they allow for a rigorous analysis of parameter and prediction uncertainties without the need for assuming parameter identifiability or removing non-identifiable parameters. A broad spectrum of MCMC algorithms have been proposed, including single- and multi-chain approaches. However, selecting and tuning sampling algorithms suited for a given problem remains challenging and a comprehensive comparison of different methods is so far not available.ResultsWe present the results of a thorough benchmarking of state-of-the-art single- and multi-chain sampling methods, including Adaptive Metropolis, Delayed Rejection Adaptive Metropolis, Metropolis adjusted Langevin algorithm, Parallel Tempering and Parallel Hierarchical Sampling. Different initialization and adaptation schemes are considered. To ensure a comprehensive and fair comparison, we consider problems with a range of features such as bifurcations, periodical orbits, multistability of steady-state solutions and chaotic regimes. These problem properties give rise to various posterior distributions including uni- and multi-modal distributions and non-normally distributed mode tails. For an objective comparison, we developed a pipeline for the semi-automatic comparison of sampling results.ConclusionThe comparison of MCMC algorithms, initialization and adaptation schemes revealed that overall multi-chain algorithms perform better than single-chain algorithms. In some cases this performance can be further increased by using a preceding multi-start local optimization scheme. These results can inform the selection of sampling methods and the benchmark collection can serve for the evaluation of new algorithms. Furthermore, our results confirm the need to address exploration quality of MCMC chains before applying the commonly used quality measure of effective sample size to prevent false analysis conclusions.

Project description:Technological advances in transcriptome sequencing of single cells provided an unprecedented view on tissue composition and cellular heterogeneity. While several studies have compared different single cell RNA-seq methods with respect to data quality and their ability to distinguish cellular subpopulations, none of these comparative studies investigated the heterogeneity of the cellular transcriptional response upon a chemical perturbation. In this study, we evaluated the transcriptional response of NGP neuroblastoma cells upon nutlin-3 treatment using the C1, ddSeq and Chromium single cell systems. These systems and library preparation methods are representative for the wide variety of platforms, ranging from microfluids chips to droplet-based systems and from full transcript sequencing to 3’ end sequencing. In parallel, we used bulk RNA-seq for molecular characterization of the transcriptional response. Two complementary metrics to evaluate performance were applied: the first is the number and identification of differentially expressed genes as robustly assessed by two statistical models, and the second is enrichment analysis of biological signals, which is independent of sample size or number of cells evaluated. Where relevant, we downsampled sequencing library size, selected cell subpopulations based on specific RNA abundance features, or created pseudobulk samples to make the data more comparable. While the C1 detects the highest number of genes per cell and better resembles bulk RNA-seq, the Chromium identifies most differentially expressed genes, albeit still substantially fewer than bulk RNA-seq. Gene set enrichment analyses reveals that detection of the most abundant genes in single cell RNA-seq experiments is sufficient for molecular phenotyping. Finally, single cell RNA-seq reveals a heterogeneous response of NGP cells upon nutlin-3 treatment, pinpointing putative late-responders or resistant cells, hidden in bulk RNA-seq experiments.

Dataset Information

Benchmarking of optical dimerizer systems.

Publications

Benchmarking of optical dimerizer systems.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets