Dataset Information

New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.

ABSTRACT: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) have rapidly gained pace worldwide, potentially replacing conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) as the preferred colorectal surgery technique. Currently available data mainly consist of retrospective series analyzed in four meta-analyses. Despite conflicting results and lack of an objective comparison, SILS appears to offer cosmetic advantages over CLS. However, due to conflicting results and marked heterogeneity, present data fail to show significant differences in terms of operative time, postoperative morbidity profiles, port-site complications rates, oncological appropriateness, duration of hospitalization or cost when comparing SILS with conventional laparoscopy for colorectal procedures. The application of "pure" NOTES in humans remains limited to case reports because of unresolved issues concerning the ideal access site, distant organ reach, spatial orientation and viscera closure. Alternatively, minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice surgery techniques are being developed. The transanal "down-to-up" total mesorectum excision has been derived for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and represents the most encouraging NOTES-derived technique. Preliminary experiences demonstrate good oncological and functional short-term outcomes. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are now mandatory to confirm the long-term SILS results and validate transanal TEM for the application of NOTES in humans.

SUBMITTER: Daher R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4277950 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.

Daher Ronald R Chouillard Elie E Panis Yves Y

World journal of gastroenterology 20141201 48

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) have rapidly gained pace worldwide, potentially replacing conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) as the preferred colorectal surgery technique. Currently available data mainly consist of retrospective series analyzed in four meta-analyses. Despite conflicting results and lack of an objective comparison, SILS appears to offer cosmetic advantages over CLS. However, due to conflicting results an ...[more]

PMID: 25561780

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNatural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is a technique that involves collecting a specimen for extraction through a natural opening avoiding a mini-laparotomy incision. The aim of this study was to compare NOSE and transabdominal specimen extraction in laparoscopic (LAP) colorectal cancer surgery for postoperative outcomes and oncological safety.MethodA systematic search was conducted in five electronic databases from inception till October 2020. Articles were selected based on the inclusion criteria (studies comparing LAP and NOSE colorectal surgeries reporting at least one of the outcomes) and analysed. Primary outcomes included postoperative complications, pathological results (resection margins and lymph node collection), and oncological outcomes. Secondary outcomes included operating time, blood losses, use of analgesics, functional recovery, duration of hospital stay, and cosmetic results. Fixed and random-effect models were used to measure the pooled estimates.ResultsNineteen studies involving a total of 3432 participants were analysed (3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 16 retrospective non-randomized studies). Pooled results showed significantly reduced postoperative complications (OR 0.54; 95 per cent c.i. 0.44 to 0.67; P < 0.00001). Pathological outcomes of NOSE were comparable to LAP with no significant difference noted in terms of resection margins (P > 0.05) and lymph node collection (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.47; 95 per cent c.i. -0.94 to 0; P = 0.05). Pooled analysis demonstrated comparable long-term outcomes in terms of cancer recurrence (OR 0.94; 95 per cent c.i. 0.63 to 1.39; P = 0.75), 5-year disease-free survival (HR 0.97; 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 1.29; P = 0.83), and overall survival (HR 0.93, 95 per cent c.i. 0.58 to -1.51; P = 0.78). Finally, the NOSE group had decreased use of additional analgesia after surgery and earlier resumption of oral intake when compared with LAP (respectively OR 0.28; 95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.37; P < 0.00001 and WMD -0.35; 95 per cent c.i. -0.54 to -0.15; P = 0.0005).ConclusionThis meta-analysis showed that in comparison with LAP, NOSE decreases severe postoperative morbidity while improving postoperative recovery without compromising oncological safety, but it is limited by the small number of RCTs performed in this field.

Project description:ObjectiveIntraoperative hemorrhage represents a major risk during endoscopic intraventricular surgery. There are very few publications describing the maintenance of hemostasis during conventional endoscopic intraventricular surgery. Here, we designed a new mini-tubular port to combine intra- and extra-endoscopic techniques for endoscopic intraventricular surgery. With this new methodology, complicated techniques can be performed more efficiently with improved bleeding control.MethodsThe new mini-tubular port consists of an outer sheath and an obturator. The sheath is a thin-walled transparent cylinder that is 0.35 mm thick, 10 mm in diameter, and 90 mm in length. In this report, we describe the use of the mini-tubular port on 36 patients receiving endoscopic intraventricular surgery.ResultsThe study enrolled 36 patients, with a median age of 45 years (range: 0-72 years), of which 19 were male and 17 were female. Pure ETV (endoscopic third ventriculostomy) was performed in 20 patients and pure biopsy was performed in 2. ETV and biopsy were performed in five patients, ETV and the removal of cysticerci were performed in five, cyst fenestration was performed in one, ETV and cyst fenestration were performed in two, and ETV and shunt removal were performed in one patient. Two patients received microscopic surgery following endoscopic surgery during the same operation. A total of 17 patients (47%) underwent extra-endoscopic techniques. The median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of the patients prior to surgery was 50, while the median KPS score of the patients after one month of surgery was 80; these scores were significantly different (P < 0.05), as determined by Wilcoxon's test. In total, 27 patients had a KPS score ≥70% and 75% of patients had a favorable prognosis one month after surgery. None of the patients experienced seizure.ConclusionThe new mini-tubular port can conveniently combine intra- and extra-endoscopic techniques for endoscopic intraventricular surgery. The application of these techniques can efficiently control bleeding during surgery, help improve the confidence of the surgeons involved, and provide a highly efficient approach for performing complicated procedures.

Dataset Information

New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.

Publications

New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets