Dataset Information

Stakeholder validation of a model of readiness for transition to adult care.

ABSTRACT: That too few youth with special health care needs make the transition to adult-oriented health care successfully may be due, in part, to lack of readiness to transfer care. There is a lack of theoretical models to guide development and implementation of evidence-based guidelines, assessments, and interventions to improve transition readiness.To further validate the Social-ecological Model of Adolescent and Young Adult Readiness to Transition (SMART) via feedback from stakeholders (patients, parents, and providers) from a medically diverse population in need of life-long follow-up care, survivors of childhood cancer.Mixed-methods participatory research design.A large Mid-Atlantic children's hospital.Adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer (n?=?14), parents (n?=?18), and pediatric providers (n?=?10).Patients and parents participated in focus groups; providers participated in individual semi-structured interviews.Validity of SMART was assessed 3 ways: (1) ratings on importance of SMART components for transition readiness using a 5-point scale (0-4; ratings >2 support validity), (2) nominations of 3 "most important" components, and (3) directed content analysis of focus group/interview transcripts.Qualitative data supported the validity of SMART, with minor modifications to definitions of components. Quantitative ratings met criteria for validity; stakeholders endorsed all components of SMART as important for transition. No additional SMART variables were suggested by stakeholders and the "most important" components varied by stakeholders, thus supporting the comprehensiveness of SMART and need to involve multiple perspectives.SMART represents a comprehensive and empirically validated framework for transition research and program planning, supported by survivors of childhood cancer, parents, and pediatric providers. Future research should validate SMART among other populations with special health care needs.

SUBMITTER: Schwartz LA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4289606 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Stakeholder validation of a model of readiness for transition to adult care.

Schwartz Lisa A LA Brumley Lauren D LD Tuchman Lisa K LK Barakat Lamia P LP Hobbie Wendy L WL Ginsberg Jill P JP Daniel Lauren C LC Kazak Anne E AE Bevans Katherine K Deatrick Janet A JA

JAMA pediatrics 20131001 10

<h4>Importance</h4>That too few youth with special health care needs make the transition to adult-oriented health care successfully may be due, in part, to lack of readiness to transfer care. There is a lack of theoretical models to guide development and implementation of evidence-based guidelines, assessments, and interventions to improve transition readiness.<h4>Objective</h4>To further validate the Social-ecological Model of Adolescent and Young Adult Readiness to Transition (SMART) via feedb ...[more]

PMID: 23959392

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveYoung people moving from child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) to adult mental health services (AMHS) are faced with significant challenges. To improve this state of affairs, there needs to be a recognition of the problem and initiatives and an urgent requirement for appropriate tools for measuring readiness and outcomes at the transfer boundary (16-18 years of age in Europe). The objective of this study was to develop and validate the Transition Readiness and Appropriateness Measure (TRAM) for assessing a young person's readiness for transition, and their outcomes at the transfer boundary.DesignMILESTONE prospective study.SettingEight European Union (EU) countries participating in the EU-funded MILESTONE study.ParticipantsThe first phase (MILESTONE validation study) involved 100 adolescents (pre-transition), young adults (post-transition), parents/carers and both CAMHS and AMHS clinicians. The second phase (MILESTONE cohort study and nested cluster randomised trial) involved over 1000 young people.ResultsThe development of the TRAM began with a literature review on transitioning and a review of important items regarding transition by a panel of 34 mental health experts. A list of 64 items of potential importance were identified, which together comprised the TRAM. The psychometric properties of the different versions of the TRAM were evaluated and showed that the TRAM had good reliability for all versions and low-to-moderate correlations when compared with other established instruments and a well-defined factor structure. The main results of the cohort study with the nested cluster randomised trial are not reported.ConclusionThe TRAM is a reliable instrument for assessing transition readiness and appropriateness. It highlighted the barriers to a successful transition and informed clinicians, identifying areas which clinicians on both sides of the transfer boundary can work on to ease the transition for the young person.Trial registration numberISRCTN83240263 (Registered 23 July 2015), NCT03013595 (Registered 6 January 2017); Pre-results.

Project description:ImportanceHealth literacy has been shown to play an important role in transitions of care in adult populations, with low health literacy associated with adverse health outcomes. The role of health literacy in the transition from pediatric to adult care has been less well studied. Among adolescents and young adults with spina bifida, high rates of unsuccessful transition have been shown, but how patient health literacy affects transition readiness remains unknown.ObjectiveTo determine whether health literacy is associated with transition readiness in adolescents and young adults with spina bifida.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study involved collection of patient-reported questionnaires between June 2019 and March 2020 at a multidisciplinary spina bifida center at a single, free-standing children's hospital. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained from medical record review. Patients were aged 12 years or older with a diagnosis of spina bifida (myelomeningocele and nonmyelomeningocele) whose primary language was English or Spanish. Data analysis was performed from October 2020 to March 2021.ExposuresHealth literacy as assessed by the Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was total Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ) score, normalized into units of SD. Nested, multivariable linear regression models assessed the association between health literacy and TRAQ scores.ResultsThe TRAQ and Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool were completed by 200 individuals (median [range] age, 17.0 [12.0-31.0] years; 104 female participants [52.0%]). Most of the patients were younger than 18 years (110 participants [55.0%]) and White (136 participants [68.0%]) and had myelomeningocele (125 participants [62.5%]). The mean (SD) TRAQ score was 3.3 (1.1). Sixty-six participants (33.0%) reported inadequate health literacy, 60 participants (30.0%) reported marginal health literacy, and 74 participants (37.0%) reported adequate health literacy. In univariable analysis, health literacy, age, type of spina bifida, level of education, self-administration vs completion of the questionnaires with assistance, ambulatory status, and urinary incontinence were associated with total TRAQ score. In all nested, sequentially adjusted, multivariable models, higher health literacy remained a significant, stepwise, independent variable associated with higher TRAQ score. In the fully adjusted model, having adequate compared with inadequate health literacy was associated with an increase in normalized TRAQ score of 0.49 SD (95% CI, 0.19-0.79).Conclusions and relevancePatient-reported transition readiness is associated with health literacy, even after adjustment for education level and other demographic and clinical factors. Developing and implementing health literacy-sensitive care programs during the transition process may improve patient transition readiness.

Project description:IntroductionAdolescents living with perinatally acquired HIV have low rates of retention in care and viral suppression after the transition from paediatric to adult care. In this study, we developed and validated a tool to identify adolescent transition readiness.MethodsWe developed the HIV Adolescent Readiness for Transition Scale (HARTS) from June 2016 to May 2019 by iteratively adapting existing transition readiness scales for other chronic illnesses by conducting focus groups with 11 healthcare providers and 20 adolescents in South Africa. We administered a preliminary questionnaire to 131 adolescents to determine psychometric properties and assess test-retest variability. We used confirmatory factor analysis to verify the proposed scale structure using the underlying variable approach. We correlated responses to self-described transition readiness and age using linear regression. We subsequently validated the scale by prospectively administering it to 199 adolescents in a second South African setting before their transition. We then used multivariable logistic regression to assess the effects of the HARTS and relevant socio-behavioural covariates on viral suppression one year after transition.ResultsWe identified four domains relevant to transition readiness: disclosure, health navigation, self-advocacy and health literacy. Fifteen questions with a significant factor loading of 0.3 to 0.9 were identified. No significant test-retest variability was seen among 10% of participants. Positive correlations with self-described transition readiness were significant with the overall HARTS and domains of health navigation, self-advocacy and health literacy. In the prospective analysis, for adolescents not using drugs, each 10-point increase in the HARTS was associated with 0.62 odds of viral failure (95% CI 0.45 to 0.86; p = 0.004). The individual domains of self-advocacy (AOR 0.56; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.94; p = 0.029), disclosure (AOR 0.02; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.25; p = 0.002), health navigation (AOR 0.51; 95%CI 0.25 to 1.02; p = 0.056) and health literacy (AOR 0.37; 95% CI 0.10 to 1.30; p = 0.121) were associated with viral failure adjusting for age at antiretroviral therapy initiation, ART regimen, sex, disclosure status, and alcohol use in both analyses.ConclusionsThe HARTS is a validated scale that can be used to identify which adolescents may require additional interventions prior to transitioning to adult care to improve viral suppression after transition.

Dataset Information

Stakeholder validation of a model of readiness for transition to adult care.

Publications

Stakeholder validation of a model of readiness for transition to adult care.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets