Dataset Information

Effect of naltrexone on neuropathic pain in mice locally transfected with the mutant μ-opioid receptor gene in spinal cord.

ABSTRACT:

Background and purpose

Opioid antagonists, such as naloxone and naltrexone, exhibit agonistic properties at the mutated μ receptor, MOR-S196ACSTA. In our previous study, systemic naloxone (10 mg·kg(-1) , s.c.) elicited antinociceptive effect without the induction of tolerance, dependence or rewarding effect in mice 2 weeks after intrathecal administration of double-stranded adeno-associated virus-MOR-S196ACSTA-eGFP. Here, we have investigated if this antinociceptive paradigm would be effective in a mouse model of neuropathic pain.

Experimental approach

Spinal nerves were ligated in male C57BL/6 mice 3 or 4 weeks after intrathecal injection of the lentivirus encoding the construct of MOR-S196ACSTA-eGFP (LV-MOR-S196ACSTA). Anti-allodynic effects of daily s.c.injections of saline, naltrexone (10 mg·kg(-1) ) or morphine (10 mg·kg(-1) ) were assessed by the von Frey test. After 14 days of treatment with saline, naltrexone or morphine, signs of natural withdrawal were measured at 22 and 46 h after the last injection. To determine the rewarding effects induced by morphine or naltrexone, the conditioned place preference test was carried out.

Key results

Anti-allodynic effects, as measured by von Frey test, increased after naltrexone or morphine treatment in mice transfected with LV-MOR-S196ACSTA in the spinal cord. Cessation of treatment with morphine, but not naltrexone, induced natural withdrawal and rewarding effects.

Conclusions and implications

Systemic injection of naltrexone after the expression of a mutant μ opioid receptor, MOR-S196ACSTA, in the spinal cord may have therapeutic potential for chronic neuropathic pain, without the development of dependence or addiction.

Linked articles

This article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-2.

SUBMITTER: Kao JH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4292974 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective: Chronic pain is a major problem in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). According to different studies, approximately 70% of patients with SCI experience persistent pain. Although previous gene expression profiling studies have been conducted in animal models, gene expression profiling study in human whole blood has not been reported yet. The objective of this study was to define the gene expression profile of neuropathic pain in spinal cord injured patients. Materials and Methods: We performed gene expression analysis including 20.000 genes using Affymetrix GeneChip® Primeview™ Human Gene Expression Arrays. For confirmation of expression levels of selected genes, we performed real time polymerase chain reaction. We gathered samples from periferic blood mononuclear cells. Data of twelve patients with intractable neuropathic pain was compared with thirteen patients who don’t have pain. All patients have complete injuries with a level of injury above T5. Results: A total of 16 differentially expressed genes including 9 up-regulated and 7 down-regulated were obtained with a cut-off degree at 4 fold change. EIF1AY, RPS4Y1, DDX3Y, RPL31, ETS1, KLF3, JUN, CYorf15B, and ERAP2 were in up-regulated and HLA-C, XIST, C4BPA, FAM118A, ZNF506, OVOS2, and C1D were in down-regulated group. KEGG pathway database showed that 14.6% of genes were enriched in the nodes of immune system. Real time polymerase chain reaction analyses did not increase to statistically significant levels for confirmation of gene expression analyze results. Conclusions: Considering these data, findings of this first gene expression study in humans with SCI might provide valuable information for future targets for understanding neuropathic pain pathogenesis. The results of gene expression analyses were not confirmed by real time polymerase chain reaction. Studies with larger sample size are needed for confirmation. This is a cross-sectional study with a control group. Patients were divided into two groups according to intractable neuropathic pain existence.There were 12 patients in group A (Patients with pain) and 13 patients in control group.