Dataset Information

XFEL diffraction: developing processing methods to optimize data quality.

ABSTRACT: Serial crystallography, using either femtosecond X-ray pulses from free-electron laser sources or short synchrotron-radiation exposures, has the potential to reveal metalloprotein structural details while minimizing damage processes. However, deriving a self-consistent set of Bragg intensities from numerous still-crystal exposures remains a difficult problem, with optimal protocols likely to be quite different from those well established for rotation photography. Here several data processing issues unique to serial crystallography are examined. It is found that the limiting resolution differs for each shot, an effect that is likely to be due to both the sample heterogeneity and pulse-to-pulse variation in experimental conditions. Shots with lower resolution limits produce lower-quality models for predicting Bragg spot positions during the integration step. Also, still shots by their nature record only partial measurements of the Bragg intensity. An approximate model that corrects to the full-spot equivalent (with the simplifying assumption that the X-rays are monochromatic) brings the distribution of intensities closer to that expected from an ideal crystal, and improves the sharpness of anomalous difference Fourier peaks indicating metal positions.

SUBMITTER: Sauter NK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4344359 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

XFEL diffraction: developing processing methods to optimize data quality.

Sauter Nicholas K NK

Journal of synchrotron radiation 20150129 2

Serial crystallography, using either femtosecond X-ray pulses from free-electron laser sources or short synchrotron-radiation exposures, has the potential to reveal metalloprotein structural details while minimizing damage processes. However, deriving a self-consistent set of Bragg intensities from numerous still-crystal exposures remains a difficult problem, with optimal protocols likely to be quite different from those well established for rotation photography. Here several data processing iss ...[more]

PMID: 25723925

Similar Datasets

Project description:X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) is the latest generation of the X-ray source that could become an invaluable technique in structural biology. XFEL has ultrashort pulse duration, extreme peak brilliance, and high spatial coherence, which could enable the observation of the biological molecules in near nature state at room temperature without crystallization. However, for biological systems, due to their low diffraction power and complexity of sample delivery, experiments and data analysis are not straightforward, making it extremely challenging to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) structures from single particle XFEL data. Given the current limitations to the amount and resolution of the data from such XFEL experiments, we propose a new hybrid approach for characterizing biomolecular conformational transitions by using a single 2D low-resolution XFEL diffraction pattern in combination with another known conformation. In our method, we represent the molecular structure with a coarse-grained model, the Gaussian mixture model, to describe large conformational transitions from low-resolution XFEL data. We obtain plausible 3D structural models that are consistent with the XFEL diffraction pattern by deforming an initial structural model to maximize the similarity between the target pattern and the simulated diffraction patterns from the candidate models. We tested the proposed algorithm on two biomolecules of different sizes with different complexities of conformational transitions, adenylate kinase, and elongation factor 2, using synthetic XFEL data. The results show that, with the proposed algorithm, we can successfully describe the conformational transitions by flexibly fitting the coarse-grained model of one conformation to become consistent with an XFEL diffraction pattern simulated from another conformation. In addition, we showed that the incident beam orientation has some effect on the accuracy of the 3D structure modeling and discussed the reasons for the inaccuracies for certain orientations. The proposed method could serve as an alternative approach for retrieving information on 3D conformational transitions from the XFEL diffraction patterns to interpret experimental data. Since the molecules are represented by Gaussian kernels and no atomic structure is needed in principle, such a method could also be used as a tool to seek initial models for 3D reconstruction algorithms.

Project description:BackgroundIt is not known whether there are differences in the quality and recommendations between evidence-based (EB) and consensus-based (CB) guidelines. We used breast cancer guidelines as a case study to assess for these differences.MethodsFive different instruments to evaluate the quality of guidelines were identified by a literature search. We also searched MEDLINE and the Internet to locate 8 breast cancer guidelines. These guidelines were classified in three categories: evidence based, consensus based and consensus based with no explicit consideration of evidence (CB-EB). Each guideline was evaluated by three of the authors using each of the instruments. For each guideline we assessed the agreement among 14 decision points which were selected from the NCCN (National Cancer Comprehensive Network) guidelines algorithm. For each decision point we recorded the level of the quality of the information used to support it. A regression analysis was performed to assess if the percentage of high quality evidence used in the guidelines development was related to the overall quality of the guidelines.ResultsThree guidelines were classified as EB, three as CB-EB and two as CB. The EB guidelines scored better than CB, with the CB-EB scoring in the middle among all instruments for guidelines quality assessment. No major disagreement in recommendations was detected among the guidelines regardless of the method used for development, but the EB guidelines had a better agreement with the benchmark guideline for any decision point. When the source of evidence used to support decision were of high quality, we found a higher level of full agreement among the guidelines' recommendations. Up to 94% of variation in the quality score among guidelines could be explained by the quality of evidence used for guidelines development.ConclusionEB guidelines have a better quality than CB guidelines and CB-EB guidelines. Explicit use of high quality evidence can lead to a better agreement among recommendations. However, no major disagreement among guidelines was noted regardless of the method for their development.

Dataset Information

XFEL diffraction: developing processing methods to optimize data quality.

Publications

XFEL diffraction: developing processing methods to optimize data quality.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets