Dataset Information

Personalization of the immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplant recipients: the great challenge in "omics" medicine.

ABSTRACT: Renal transplantation represents the most favorable treatment for patients with advanced renal failure and it is followed, in most cases, by a significant enhancement in patients' quality of life. Significant improvements in one-year renal allograft and patients' survival rates have been achieved over the last 10 years primarily as a result of newer immunosuppressive regimens. Despite these notable achievements in the short-term outcome, long-term graft function and survival rates remain less than optimal. Death with a functioning graft and chronic allograft dysfunction result in an annual rate of 3%-5%. In this context, drug toxicity and long-term chronic adverse effects of immunosuppressive medications have a pivotal role. Unfortunately, at the moment, except for the evaluation of trough drug levels, no clinically useful tools are available to correctly manage immunosuppressive therapy. The proper use of these drugs could potentiate therapeutic effects minimizing adverse drug reactions. For this purpose, in the future, "omics" techniques could represent powerful tools that may be employed in clinical practice to routinely aid the personalization of drug treatment according to each patient's genetic makeup. However, it is unquestionable that additional studies and technological advances are needed to standardize and simplify these methodologies.

SUBMITTER: Zaza G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4346957 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Personalization of the immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplant recipients: the great challenge in "omics" medicine.

Zaza Gianluigi G Granata Simona S Tomei Paola P Dalla Gassa Alessandra A Lupo Antonio A

International journal of molecular sciences 20150217 2

Renal transplantation represents the most favorable treatment for patients with advanced renal failure and it is followed, in most cases, by a significant enhancement in patients' quality of life. Significant improvements in one-year renal allograft and patients' survival rates have been achieved over the last 10 years primarily as a result of newer immunosuppressive regimens. Despite these notable achievements in the short-term outcome, long-term graft function and survival rates remain less th ...[more]

PMID: 25690039

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation is associated with poor graft outcomes. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of the Adhere4U mobile medication manager application could improve adherence among renal transplant recipients ?1 year posttransplantation. Adhere4U can provide medication reminders, monitor medication use, and provide information on immunosuppressants. METHODS:We conducted a prospective randomized controlled study to compare the rate of nonadherence to index immunosuppressant (tacrolimus or cyclosporine) in a group using the Adhere4U app (mobile group) and in another group receiving conventional care (control group). The primary outcome was the nonadherence rate, which was evaluated using an electronic medication event monitoring system during the 6-month intervention period. Our secondary outcome included self-reported adherence using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale (BAASIS) and the visual analog scale (VAS) based on a 4-week recall on days 28, 90, and 180. Longitudinal data of repeated measures of self-rated adherence were analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to compare the between-group difference in adherence change over time. RESULTS:Between November 2013 and May 2015, 138 renal transplant recipients were randomly allocated to the control (n = 67) or the mobile group (n = 71). The overall nonadherence rate over the 6-month study period by electronic monitoring was 63.6%, with no between-group difference [mobile group, 65.0% (n = 39/60); control group, 62.1% (n = 36/58); odds ratio 1.14; 95% confidence interval 0.53-2.40; p = 0.89]. Self-rated nonadherence assessed using the BAASIS and VAS at baseline was 53.7% and 51.5%, respectively. Although the self-rated nonadherence by BAASIS of the mobile group was lower than the control group throughout the study period, there was no between-group difference in the change of nonadherence over time (?2 = 2.82, df = 3, p = 0.42 by logistic GEE). There also was no significant between-group difference in the nonadherence by VAS (?2 = 1.71, df = 3, p = 0.63 by logistic GEE) over time. The main limitation of this study was the low rate of patient engagement with the app among the mobile group. The rate of app use was 47.6% (31/65) at 28 days, 33.9% (19/56) at 90 days, and 11.5% (6/52) at 180 days. CONCLUSIONS:The Adhere4U application did not improve adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Our evidence is limited by the high rate of attrition. Further studies on strategies to facilitate patient engagement with mobile interventions are warranted.

Dataset Information

Personalization of the immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplant recipients: the great challenge in "omics" medicine.

Publications

Personalization of the immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplant recipients: the great challenge in "omics" medicine.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure