Dataset Information

Nontraumatic hypotension and shock in the emergency department and the prehospital setting, prevalence, etiology, and mortality: a systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Acute patients presenting with hypotension in the prehospital or emergency department (ED) setting are in need of focused management and knowledge of the epidemiology characteristics might help the clinician. The aim of this review was to address prevalence, etiology and mortality of nontraumatic hypotension (SBP ? 90 mmHg) with or without the presence of shock in the prehospital and ED setting.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search up to August 2013, using Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Dare and The Cochrane Library. The analysis and eligibility criteria were documented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-guidelines) and The Cochrane Collaboration. No restrictions on language, publication date, or status were imposed. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS-scale) and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE-statement) to assess the quality.

Results

Six observational studies were considered eligible for analysis based on the evaluation of 11,880 identified papers. Prehospital prevalence of hypotension was 19.5/1000 emergency medicine service (EMS) contacts, and the prevalence of hypotensive shock was 9.5-19/1000 EMS contacts with an inhospital mortality of shock between 33 to 52%. ED prevalence of hypotension was 4-13/1000 contacts with a mortality of 12%. Information on mortality, prevalence and etiology of shock in the ED was limited. A meta-analysis was not feasible due to substantial heterogeneity between studies.

Conclusion

There is inadequate evidence to establish concise estimates of the characteristics of nontraumatic hypotension and shock in the ED or in the prehospital setting. The available studies suggest that 2% of EMS contacts present with nontraumatic hypotension while 1-2% present with shock. The inhospital mortality of prehospital shock is 33-52%. Prevalence of hypotension in the ED is 1% with an inhospital mortality of 12%. Prevalence, etiology and mortality of shock in the ED are not well described.

SUBMITTER: Holler JG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4366173 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Nontraumatic hypotension and shock in the emergency department and the prehospital setting, prevalence, etiology, and mortality: a systematic review.

Holler Jon Gitz JG Bech Camilla Nørgaard CN Henriksen Daniel Pilsgaard DP Mikkelsen Søren S Pedersen Court C Lassen Annmarie Touborg AT

PloS one 20150319 3

<h4>Background</h4>Acute patients presenting with hypotension in the prehospital or emergency department (ED) setting are in need of focused management and knowledge of the epidemiology characteristics might help the clinician. The aim of this review was to address prevalence, etiology and mortality of nontraumatic hypotension (SBP ≤ 90 mmHg) with or without the presence of shock in the prehospital and ED setting.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a systematic literature search up to August 2013, usin ...[more]

PMID: 25789927

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionThe knowledge of the etiology and associated mortality of undifferentiated shock in the emergency department (ED) is limited. We aimed to describe the etiology-based proportions and incidence rates (IR) of shock, as well as the associated mortality in the ED.MethodsPopulation-based cohort study at a University Hospital ED in Denmark from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2011. Patients aged ?18 years living in the ED-catchment area (N?=?225,000) with a first-time ED presentation with shock (n?=?1,553) defined as hypotension (systolic blood pressure ?100?mm Hg) and ?1 organ failures were included. Discharge diagnoses defined the etiology and were grouped as follows: distributive septic shock (SS), distributive non-septic shock (NS), cardiogenic shock (CS), hypovolemic shock (HS), obstructive shock (OS), and other conditions (OC). Outcomes were etiology-based characteristics, annual IR per 100,000 person-years at risk (95% confidence intervals [CIs]), mortality at 0 to 7-, and 0 to 90 days (95% CIs) and hazard rates (HR) at 0 to 7, 8 to 90 days (95% CIs). Poisson and Cox regression models were used for analyses.ResultsAmong 1,553 shock patients: 423 (27.2%) had SS, 363 (23.4%) NS, 217 (14.0%) CS, 479 (30.8%) HS, 14 (0.9%) OS, and 57 (3.7%) OC. The corresponding IRs were 16.2/100,000 (95% CI: 14.8-17.9), 13.9/100,000 (95% CI: 12.6-15.4), 8.3/100,000 (95% CI: 7.3-9.5), 18.4/100,000 (95% CI: 16.8-20.1), 0.5/100,000 (95% CI: 0.3-0.9), and 2.2/100,000 (95% CI: 1.7-2.8). SS IR increased from 8.4 to 28.5/100,000 during the period 2000 to 2011. Accordingly, the 7-, and 90-day mortalities of SS, NS, CS, and HS were 30.3% (95% CI: 25.9-34.7) and 56.2% (95% CI: 50.7-61.5), 12.7% (95% CI: 9.2-16.1) and 22.6% (95% CI: 18.1-27.7), 34.6% (95% CI: 28.2-40.9) and 52.3% (95% CI: 44.6-59.8), 19.2% (95% CI: 15.7-22.7), and 36.8% (95% CI: 33.3-43.3). SS (HR?=?1.46 [95% CI: 1.03-2.07]), and CS (HR?=?2.15 [95% CI: 1.47-3.13]) were independent predictors of death within 0 to 7 days, whereas SS was a predictor within 8 to 90 days (HR?=?1.66 [95% CI: 1.14-2.42]).ConclusionHS and SS are frequent etiological characteristics followed by NS and CS, whereas OS is a rare condition. We confirm the increasing trend of SS, as previously reported. Seven-day mortality ranged from 12.7% to 34.6%, while 90-day mortality ranged from 22.6% to 56.2%. The underlying etiology was an independent predictor of mortality.

Project description:RationaleEarly antibiotics improve outcomes for patients with sepsis. Factors influencing antibiotic timing in emergency department (ED) sepsis remain unclear.ObjectivesDetermine the relationship between prehospital level of care of patients with sepsis and ED door-to-antibiotic time.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study comprised patients admitted from the community to an academic ED June 2009 to February 2015 with fluid-refractory sepsis or septic shock. Transfer patients and those whose antibiotics began before ED arrival or after ED discharge were excluded. We used multivariable regression to evaluate the association between the time from ED arrival to antibiotic initiation and prehospital level of care, defined as the highest level of emergency medical services received: none, basic life support (BLS) ambulance, or advanced life support (ALS) ambulance. We measured variation in this association when hypotension was or was not present by ED arrival.ResultsAmong 361 community-dwelling patients with sepsis, the level of prehospital care correlated with illness severity. ALS-treated patients received antibiotics faster than patients who did not receive prehospital care (median, 103 [interquartile range, 75 to 135] vs. 144 [98 to 251] minutes, respectively) or BLS-only patients (168 [100-250] minutes; P < 0.001 for each pairwise comparison with ALS). This pattern persisted after multivariable adjustment, where ALS care (-43 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], -84 to -2; P = 0.033) but not BLS-only care (-4 min; 95% CI, -41 to +34; P = 0.97) was associated with less antibiotic delay compared with no prehospital care. ALS-treated patients more frequently received antibiotics within 3 hours of ED arrival (91%) compared with walk-in patients (62%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.20 to 8.03; P = 0.015) or BLS-treated patients (56%; adjusted odds ratio, 4.51; 95% CI, 1.89 to 11.35; P < 0.001). ALS-treated patients started antibiotics faster than walk-in patients in the absence of hypotension by ED arrival (-41 min; 95% CI, -110 to -13; P = 0.009) but not when hypotension was present (+25 min; 95% CI, -43 to +92; P = 0.66).ConclusionsPrehospital ALS but not BLS-only care was associated with faster antibiotic initiation for patients with sepsis without hypotension. Process redesign for non-ALS patients may improve antibiotic timeliness for ED sepsis.

Dataset Information

Nontraumatic hypotension and shock in the emergency department and the prehospital setting, prevalence, etiology, and mortality: a systematic review.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Nontraumatic hypotension and shock in the emergency department and the prehospital setting, prevalence, etiology, and mortality: a systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets