Consequences of periodic ?-to-?(3) residue replacement for immunological recognition of peptide epitopes.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Oligomers that contain both ?- and ?-amino acid residues, or "?/?-peptides", have emerged as promising mimics of signal-bearing polypeptides that can inhibit or augment natural protein-protein interactions. ?/?-Peptides that contain a sufficient proportion of ? residues evenly distributed along the sequence can be highly resistant to enzymatic degradation, which is favorable with regard to in vivo applications. Little is known, however, about recognition of ?/?-peptides by the immune system. Prior studies have focused almost entirely on examples that contain a single ? residue; such ?/?-peptides frequently retain the immunological profile of the analogous ?-peptide. We have conducted ?-peptide vs ?/?-peptide comparisons involving higher ? residue content, focusing on molecules with ???? and ??????? backbone repeat patterns. Among analogues of an 18-mer derived from the Bim BH3 domain and an 8-mer derived from secreted phospholipase-2 (sPLA2), we find that recognition by antibodies raised against the prototype ?-peptide is suppressed by periodic ? ? ? replacements. Complementary studies reveal that antibodies raised against Bim BH3- or sPLA2-derived ?/?-peptides fail to recognize prototype ?-peptides displaying identical side chain repertoires. Because polypeptides containing d-?-amino acid residues are of growing interest for biomedical applications, we included the enantiomer of the sPLA2-derived ?-peptide in these studies; this d-peptide is fully competent as a hapten, but the resulting antibodies do not cross react with the enantiomeric peptide. Among analogues of the 9-mer CD8(+) T-cell viral epitope GP33, we observe that periodic ? ? ? replacements suppress participation in the MHC I + peptide + T-cell receptor ternary complexes that activate cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, due in part to disruption of MHC binding.
SUBMITTER: Cheloha RW
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4372116 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA