Dataset Information

Evaluation of two influenza surveillance systems in South Africa.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The World Health Organisation recommends outpatient influenza-like illness (ILI) and inpatient severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) surveillance. We evaluated two influenza surveillance systems in South Africa: one for ILI and another for SARI.

Methodology

The Viral Watch (VW) programme has collected virological influenza surveillance data voluntarily from patients with ILI since 1984 in private and public clinics in all 9 South African provinces. The SARI surveillance programme has collected epidemiological and virological influenza surveillance data since 2009 in public hospitals in 4 provinces by dedicated personnel. We compared nine surveillance system attributes from 2009-2012.

Results

We analysed data from 18,293 SARI patients and 9,104 ILI patients. The annual proportion of samples testing positive for influenza was higher for VW (mean 41%) than SARI (mean 8%) and generally exceeded the seasonal threshold from May to September (VW: weeks 21-40; SARI: weeks 23-39). Data quality was a major strength of SARI (most data completion measures >90%; adherence to definitions: 88-89%) and a relative weakness of the VW programme (62% of forms complete, with limited epidemiologic data collected; adherence to definitions: 65-82%). Timeliness was a relative strength of both systems (e.g. both collected >93% of all respiratory specimens within 7 days of symptom onset). ILI surveillance was more nationally representative, financially sustainable and expandable than the SARI system. Though the SARI programme is not nationally representative, the high quality and detail of SARI data collection sheds light on the local burden and epidemiology of severe influenza-associated disease.

Conclusions

To best monitor influenza in South Africa, we propose that both ILI and SARI should be under surveillance. Improving ILI surveillance will require better quality and more systematic data collection, and SARI surveillance should be expanded to be more nationally representative, even if this requires scaling back on information gathered.

SUBMITTER: Budgell E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4379032 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of two influenza surveillance systems in South Africa.

Budgell Eric E Cohen Adam L AL McAnerney Jo J Walaza Sibongile S Madhi Shabir A SA Blumberg Lucille L Dawood Halima H Kahn Kathleen K Tempia Stefano S Venter Marietjie M Cohen Cheryl C

PloS one 20150330 3

<h4>Background</h4>The World Health Organisation recommends outpatient influenza-like illness (ILI) and inpatient severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) surveillance. We evaluated two influenza surveillance systems in South Africa: one for ILI and another for SARI.<h4>Methodology</h4>The Viral Watch (VW) programme has collected virological influenza surveillance data voluntarily from patients with ILI since 1984 in private and public clinics in all 9 South African provinces. The SARI surveillan ...[more]

PMID: 25822719

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) tracks influenza-like illness (ILI) using information on patient visits to health care providers through the Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet). As participation in this system is voluntary, the composition, coverage, and consistency of health care reports vary from state to state, leading to different measures of ILI activity between regions. The degree to which these measures reflect actual differences in influenza activity or systematic differences in the methods used to collect and aggregate the data is unclear. OBJECTIVE:The objective of our study was to qualitatively and quantitatively compare national and region-specific ILI activity in the United States across 4 surveillance data sources-CDC ILINet, Flu Near You (FNY), athenahealth, and HealthTweets.org-to determine whether these data sources, commonly used as input in influenza modeling efforts, show geographical patterns that are similar to those observed in CDC ILINet's data. We also compared the yearly percentage of FNY participants who sought health care for ILI symptoms across geographical areas. METHODS:We compared the national and regional 2018-2019 ILI activity baselines, calculated using noninfluenza weeks from previous years, for each surveillance data source. We also compared measures of ILI activity across geographical areas during 3 influenza seasons, 2015-2016, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018. Geographical differences in weekly ILI activity within each data source were also assessed using relative mean differences and time series heatmaps. National and regional age-adjusted health care-seeking percentages were calculated for each influenza season by dividing the number of FNY participants who sought medical care for ILI symptoms by the total number of ILI reports within an influenza season. Pearson correlations were used to assess the association between the health care-seeking percentages and baselines for each surveillance data source. RESULTS:We observed consistent differences in ILI activity across geographical areas for CDC ILINet and athenahealth data. ILI activity for FNY displayed little variation across geographical areas, whereas differences in ILI activity for HealthTweets.org were associated with the total number of tweets within a geographical area. The percentage of FNY participants who sought health care for ILI symptoms differed slightly across geographical areas, and these percentages were positively correlated with CDC ILINet and athenahealth baselines. CONCLUSIONS:Our findings suggest that differences in ILI activity across geographical areas as reported by a given surveillance system may not accurately reflect true differences in the prevalence of ILI. Instead, these differences may reflect systematic collection and aggregation biases that are particular to each system and consistent across influenza seasons. These findings are potentially relevant in the real-time analysis of the influenza season and in the definition of unbiased forecast models.

Project description:BackgroundSouth Africa set a target to eliminate malaria by 2023, with KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Province the malaria-endemic province closest to achieving this goal. Objective two of the National Malaria Elimination Strategic Plan (NMESP) focused on strengthening surveillance systems to support the country's elimination efforts. Regular evaluations of the malaria surveillance systems against the targets of the NMESP objective are crucial in improving their performance and impact. This study aimed to assess whether the malaria surveillance system in KwaZulu-Natal Province meets the NMESP surveillance objective and goals.MethodsA mixed-methods cross-sectional study design was used to evaluate the malaria surveillance system, focusing on the District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2). The study assessed the data quality, timeliness, simplicity, and acceptability of the system. Key personnel from KZN's Provincial malaria control programme were interviewed using self-administered questionnaires to evaluate their perception of the system's simplicity and acceptability. Malaria case data from January 2016 to December 2020 were extracted from the DHIS2 and evaluated for data quality and timeliness.ResultsThe survey respondents generally found the DHIS2-based surveillance system acceptable (79%, 11/14) and easy to use (71%, 10/14), stating that they could readily find, extract, and share data (64%, 9/14). Overall data quality was good (88.9%), although some variables needed for case classification had low completeness and data availability. However, case notifications were not timely, with only 61% (2 622/4 329) of cases notified within 24 h of diagnosis. During the 5-year study period, the DHIS2 captured 4 333 malaria cases. The majority of cases (81%, 3 489/4 330) were categorized as imported, and predominately in males (67%, 2 914/4 333).ConclusionWhile the malaria surveillance system in KZN Province largely met the NMESP surveillance strategic goals, it failed to achieve the overarching surveillance objective of 100% notification of cases within 24 h of diagnosis. The majority of reported cases in KZN Province were classified as imported, emphasizing the importance of complete data for accurate case classification. Engaging with healthcare professionals responsible for case notification and disseminating aggregated data back to them is needed to encourage and improve notification timeliness.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of two influenza surveillance systems in South Africa.

Background

Methodology

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Evaluation of two influenza surveillance systems in South Africa.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets