Dataset Information

Mexazolam: clinical efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of anxiety.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Mexazolam is indicated for the management of anxiety with or without psychoneurotic conditions. In adult patients, the recommended daily dosage of mexazolam is 1-3 mg, administered three times daily. The objective of this article is to review the available information on the benzodiazepine (BZD) mexazolam and its clinical utility in treating patients with anxiety.

Methods

The PubMed database was searched using the keyword "mexazolam" with no date or language restrictions applied to the search. As only 11 papers were retrieved, some previously published manuscripts of interest known by the authors (not indexed on PubMed) have been added for completeness. Relevant information was selected for inclusion by the authors.

Results

A number of early studies demonstrated the ability of mexazolam to reduce anxiety symptoms with few side effects in patients with disorders associated with anxiety. Following on from this preliminary evidence, controlled studies directly comparing mexazolam with other BZDs showed that the drug is more effective than bromazepam and oxazolam, and is at least as effective as alprazolam. A larger, multicenter, phase IV study also showed that mexazolam 2 or 3 mg/day rapidly improved Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores and substantially reduced the frequency and severity of numerous somatic anxiety symptoms in patients with anxiety disorders. With regard to safety, the clinical evidence indicates that mexazolam is generally well tolerated, with a low incidence of drowsiness and sedation. Furthermore, the lack of psychomotor or cognitive performance impairment following mexazolam administration may lead to better treatment compliance.

Conclusion

The available clinical evidence suggests that mexazolam is an effective therapeutic option for the management of anxiety. However, larger, well-controlled clinical trials are needed to directly compare and contrast mexazolam's efficacy and safety with other BZDs.

SUBMITTER: Fernandes H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4381915 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine during short-term treatment in adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).We conducted a comprehensive literature review of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials databases for randomized controlled trials(RCTs) comparing duloxetine or duloxetine plus other antipsychotics with placebo for the treatment of GAD in adults. Outcome measures were (1) efficacy, assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS) anxiety subscale score, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety(HAM-A) psychic and somatic anxiety factor scores, and response and remission rates based on total scores of HAM-A; (2) tolerability, assessed by discontinuation rate due to adverse events, the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events(TEAEs) and serious adverse events(SAEs). Review Manager 5.3 and Stata Version 12.0 software were used for all statistical analyses.The meta-analysis included 8 RCTs. Mean changes in the HADS anxiety subscale score [mean difference(MD) = 2.32, 95% confidence interval(CI) 1.77-2.88, P<0.00001] and HAM-A psychic anxiety factor score were significantly greater in patients with GAD that received duloxetine compared to those that received placebo (MD = 2.15, 95%CI 1.61-2.68, P<0.00001). However, there was no difference in mean change in the HAM-A somatic anxiety factor score (MD = 1.13, 95%CI 0.67-1.58, P<0.00001). Discontinuation rate due to AEs in the duloxetine group was significantly higher than the placebo group [odds ratio(OR) = 2.62, 95%CI 1.35-5.06, P = 0.004]. The incidence of any TEAE was significantly increased in patients that received duloxetine (OR = 1.76, 95%CI 1.36-2.28, P<0.0001), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of SAEs (OR = 1.13, 95%CI 0.52-2.47, P = 0.75).Duloxetine resulted in a greater improvement in symptoms of psychic anxiety and similar changes in symptoms of somatic anxiety compared to placebo during short-term treatment in adults with GAD and its tolerability was acceptable.

Project description:BackgroundNo meta-analysis for estimating the comprehensive efficacy and tolerability of fluvoxamine in patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) has been published.ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and tolerability of fluvoxamine in adults with SAD, trials meeting the following criteria were identified: population: ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of SAD; intervention: fluvoxamine; study design: placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs); outcomes: efficacy and tolerability outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs on January 3, 2018. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata Version 12.0 software were used for all statistical analyses. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous variables, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated for dichotomous variables. Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool was used to assess the likelihood of risk of bias. Efficacy was assessed by mean changes in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety scale (LSAS) total score and the Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score as well as the response rate. Tolerability was mainly assessed by the discontinuation rate due to adverse events (AEs) and the incidence of most frequent treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs).ResultsThis meta-analysis included 5 RCTs. Mean changes in LSAS total and CGI-S scores were both significantly greater in patients treated with fluvoxamine than those treated with placebo (LSAS: MD = 11.90, 95% CI = 8.09-15.71, P < .001; CGI-S: MD = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.33-0.72, P < .001). Response rate was higher in fluvoxamine group as compared with placebo (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.30-2.24, P < .001). Additionally, mean change in the Sheehan disability scale score was significantly greater in fluvoxamine group than placebo group (OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.03-3.18, P < .001). The discontinuation rate due to AEs was higher in patients that received fluvoxamine compared to those received placebo (OR = 5.99, 95% CI = 2.24-15.99, P < .001), as was the incidence of overall TEAEs (any AE) (OR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.77-4.02, P < .001). However, the incidence of serious AEs was not significantly different between the 2 groups (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.25-3.89, P = .99).ConclusionFluvoxamine was found to be effective in adult patients with SAD, with acceptable tolerability.

Project description:Importance:Antipsychotic medications for the treatment of schizophrenia have limitations, and new treatments are needed. A prior pilot investigation suggested that adjunctive sodium nitroprusside (SNP) administered intravenously had rapid efficacy in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Objective:To determine the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous SNP infused at a rate of 0.5 μg/kg/min for 4 hours in patients with schizophrenia with some degree of treatment resistance. Design, Setting, and Participants:Multicenter, randomized, double-blind acute treatment study using a sequential parallel comparison design conducted in two 2-week phases at 4 academic medical centers beginning May 20, 2015, and ending March 31, 2017. Participants were adults 18 to 65 years of age with a diagnosis of schizophrenia as confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, taking antipsychotic medication for at least 8 weeks, and had at least 1 failed trial of an antipsychotic medication within the past year. A total of 90 participants consented, 60 participants enrolled, and 52 participants were included in the analyses. A modified intent-to-treat analysis was used. Interventions:Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to 1 of 3 treatment sequences: SNP and SNP, placebo and SNP, and placebo and placebo. The SNP and SNP group received SNP in phase 1 and SNP in phase 2 for the purpose of blinding, but the data from phase 2 were not included in the results. The placebo and SNP group received placebo in phase 1 and SNP in phase 2. If there was no response to placebo in phase 1, data from phase 2 were included in the analyses. The placebo and placebo group received placebo in both phases; if there was no response to placebo in phase 1, data from phase 2 were included in the analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures:Effectiveness of SNP compared with placebo in improving Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total, positive, and negative scores across each 2-week phase. Results:Fifty-two participants (12 women and 40 men) were included in the study. In the SNP and SNP group, the mean (SD) age was 47.1 (10.5) years. In the placebo and SNP group, the mean (SD) age was 45.9 (12.3) years. In the placebo and placebo group, the mean (SD) age was 40.4 (11.0) years. There were no significant differences between the SNP and placebo groups at baseline or in change from baseline for PANSS-total (weighted β = -1.04; z = -0.59; P = .57), PANSS-positive (weighted β = -0.62; z = -0.93; P = .35), or PANSS-negative (weighted β = -0.12; z = -0.19; P = .85) scores. No significant differences in safety or tolerability measures were identified. Conclusions and Relevance:Although intravenous SNP is well tolerated, it was not an efficacious adjunctive treatment of positive or negative symptoms of psychosis among outpatients with schizophrenia with prior history of treatment resistance. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02164981.