Symptoms and other factors associated with time to diagnosis and stage of lung cancer: a prospective cohort study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
This prospective cohort study aimed to identify symptom and patient factors that influence time to lung cancer diagnosis and stage at diagnosis.Methods
Data relating to symptoms were collected from patients upon referral with symptoms suspicious of lung cancer in two English regions; we also examined primary care and hospital records for diagnostic routes and diagnoses. Descriptive and regression analyses were used to investigate associations between symptoms and patient factors with diagnostic intervals and stage.Results
Among 963 participants, 15.9% were diagnosed with primary lung cancer, 5.9% with other thoracic malignancies and 78.2% with non-malignant conditions. Only half the cohort had an isolated first symptom (475, 49.3%); synchronous first symptoms were common. Haemoptysis, reported by 21.6% of cases, was the only initial symptom associated with cancer. Diagnostic intervals were shorter for cancer than non-cancer diagnoses (91 vs 124 days, P=0.037) and for late-stage than early-stage cancer (106 vs 168 days, P=0.02). Chest/shoulder pain was the only first symptom with a shorter diagnostic interval for cancer compared with non-cancer diagnoses (P=0.003).Conclusions
Haemoptysis is the strongest symptom predictor of lung cancer but occurs in only a fifth of patients. Programmes for expediting earlier diagnosis need to focus on multiple symptoms and their evolution.
SUBMITTER: Walter FM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4385970 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:The objective of this study is to investigate symptoms, clinical factors and socio-demographic factors associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis and time to diagnosis.Prospective cohort study of participants referred for suspicion of CRC in two English regions. Data were collected using a patient questionnaire, primary care and hospital records. Descriptive and regression analyses examined associations between symptoms and patient factors with total diagnostic interval (TDI), patient interval (PI), health system interval (HSI) and stage.A total of 2677 (22%) participants responded; after exclusions, 2507 remained. Participants were diagnosed with CRC (6.1%, 56% late stage), other cancers (2.0%) or no cancer (91.9%). Half the cohort had a solitary first symptom (1332, 53.1%); multiple first symptoms were common. In this referred population, rectal bleeding was the only initial symptom more frequent among cancer than non-cancer cases (34.2% vs 23.9%, P=0.004). There was no evidence of differences in TDI, PI or HSI for those with cancer vs non-cancer diagnoses (median TDI CRC 124 vs non-cancer 138 days, P=0.142). First symptoms associated with shorter TDIs were rectal bleeding, change in bowel habit, 'feeling different' and fatigue/tiredness. Anxiety, depression and gastro-intestinal co-morbidities were associated with longer HSIs and TDIs. Symptom duration-dependent effects were found for rectal bleeding and change in bowel habit.Doctors and patients respond less promptly to some symptoms of CRC than others. Healthcare professionals should be vigilant to the possibility of CRC in patients with relevant symptoms and mental health or gastro-intestinal comorbidities.
| S-EPMC4997546 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundPancreatic cancer is the tenth most common cancer in the UK; however, outcomes are poor, in part due to late diagnosis. We aimed to identify symptoms and other clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with pancreatic cancer diagnosis and diagnostic intervals.MethodsWe did this prospective cohort study at seven hospitals in two regions in England. We recruited participants aged 40 years or older who were referred for suspicion of pancreatic cancer. Data were collected by use of a patient questionnaire and primary care and hospital records. Descriptive and regression analyses were done to examine associations between symptoms and patient factors with the total diagnostic interval (time from onset of the first symptom to the date of diagnosis), comprising patient interval (time from first symptom to first presentation) and health system interval (time from first presentation to diagnosis).FindingsWe recruited 391 participants between Jan 1, 2011, and Dec 31, 2014 (24% response rate). 119 (30%) participants were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (41 [34%] had metastatic disease), 47 (12%) with other cancers, and 225 (58%) with no cancer. 212 (54%) patients had multiple first symptoms whereas 161 (41%) patients had a solitary first symptom. In this referred population, no initial symptoms were reported more frequently by patients with cancer than by those with no cancer. Several subsequent symptoms predicted pancreatic cancer: jaundice (51 [49%] of 105 patients with pancreatic cancer vs 25 [12%] of 211 patients with no cancer; p<0·0001), fatigue (48/95 [51%] vs 40/155 [26%]; p=0·0001), change in bowel habit (36/87 [41%] vs 28/175 [16%]; p<0·0001), weight loss (55/100 [55%] vs 41/184 [22%]; p<0·0001), and decreased appetite (41/86 [48%] vs 41/156 [26%]; p=0·0011). There was no difference in any interval between patients with pancreatic cancer and those with no cancer (total diagnostic interval: median 117 days [IQR 57-234] vs 131 days [IQR 66-284]; p=0·32; patient interval 18 days [0-37] vs 15 days [1-62]; p=0·22; health system interval 76 days [28-161] vs 79 days [30-156]; p=0·68). Total diagnostic intervals were shorter when jaundice (hazard ratio [HR] 1·38, 95% CI 1·07-1·78; p=0·013) and decreased appetite (1·42, 1·11-1·82; p=0·0058) were reported as symptoms, and longer in patients presenting with indigestion (0·71, 0·56-0·89; p=0·0033), back pain (0·77, 0·59-0·99; p=0·040), diabetes (0·71, 0·52-0·97; p=0·029), and self-reported anxiety or depression, or both (0·67, 0·49-0·91; p=0·011). Health system intervals were likewise longer with indigestion (0·74, 0·58-0·95; p=0·0018), back pain (0·76, 0·58-0·99; p=0·044), diabetes (0·63, 0·45-0·89; p=0·0082), and self-reported anxiety or depression, or both (0·63, 0·46-0·88; p=0·0064), but were shorter with male sex (1·41, 1·1-1·81; p=0·0072) and decreased appetite (1·56, 1·19-2·06; p=0·0015). Weight loss was associated with longer patient intervals (HR 0·69, 95% CI 0·54-0·89; p=0·0047).InterpretationAlthough we identified no initial symptoms that differentiated people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer from those without pancreatic cancer, key additional symptoms might signal the disease. Health-care professionals should be vigilant to the possibility of pancreatic cancer in patients with evolving gastrointestinal and systemic symptoms, particularly in those with diabetes or mental health comorbidities.FundingNational Institute for Health Research and Pancreatic Cancer Action.
| S-EPMC6358142 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Purpose: The primary objective of the current study was to validate biomarkers to identify the 10% to 27% of patients with stage I and 35% of patients with stage IIA squamous cell carcinoma of lung (SC) who are likely to recur following surgical resection, so that these patients may be offered enrollment in clinical trials evaluating directed ACT. A secondary objective was to identify patients with stage IIB SC who are unlikely to develop recurrences and might thereby be spared the potential significant toxicity and expense of ACT. Methods: Two-stage validation used independent core laboratories, objective quality control standards, locked test parameters, and large multi-institutional specimen/data sets. First stage validation confirmed a signature’s ability to stratify patient survival. Second stage validation determined which signature(s) optimally improved risk discrimination when added to baseline clinical predictors. Participants were prospectively enrolled on institutional (Cohort I) or cooperative group (Cohort II) biospecimen/data collection protocols. All cases underwent central review of clinical, pathologic and biospecimen parameters using objective criteria to determine final inclusion (Cohort I: n=249; Cohort II: n=234). Primary selection required that a signature significantly predict 3-years survival after surgery in Cohort I. Signatures meeting this criterion were further tested in Cohort II, comparing risk prediction using baseline risk factors alone versus in combination with the signature. Results: Male sex, advanced age, and higher stage were associated with shorter survival in Cohort I and established a baseline clinical model. Of three signatures validated in Cohort I, one signature was validated in Cohort II and statistically significantly enhanced prognosis relative to the baseline model (C-index difference 0.122; p<0.05). Conclusions: These results represent the first rigorous validation of a test appropriate to direct adjuvant treatment or clinical trials for patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma.
2020-08-28 | GSE157010 | GEO
Project description:Purpose: The primary objective of the current study was to validate biomarkers to identify the 10% to 27% of patients with stage I and 35% of patients with stage IIA squamous cell carcinoma of lung (SC) who are likely to recur following surgical resection, so that these patients may be offered enrollment in clinical trials evaluating directed ACT. A secondary objective was to identify patients with stage IIB SC who are unlikely to develop recurrences and might thereby be spared the potential significant toxicity and expense of ACT. Methods: Two-stage validation used independent core laboratories, objective quality control standards, locked test parameters, and large multi-institutional specimen/data sets. First stage validation confirmed a signature’s ability to stratify patient survival. Second stage validation determined which signature(s) optimally improved risk discrimination when added to baseline clinical predictors. Participants were prospectively enrolled on institutional (Cohort I) or cooperative group (Cohort II) biospecimen/data collection protocols. All cases underwent central review of clinical, pathologic and biospecimen parameters using objective criteria to determine final inclusion (Cohort I: n=249; Cohort II: n=234). Primary selection required that a signature significantly predict 3-years survival after surgery in Cohort I. Signatures meeting this criterion were further tested in Cohort II, comparing risk prediction using baseline risk factors alone versus in combination with the signature. Results: Male sex, advanced age, and higher stage were associated with shorter survival in Cohort I and established a baseline clinical model. Of three signatures validated in Cohort I, one signature was validated in Cohort II and statistically significantly enhanced prognosis relative to the baseline model (C-index difference 0.122; p<0.05). Conclusions: These results represent the first rigorous validation of a test appropriate to direct adjuvant treatment or clinical trials for patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma.
2020-08-28 | GSE157009 | GEO
Project description:BackgroundInternational and national differences exist in survival among lung cancer patients. Possible explanations include varying proportions of emergency presentations (EPs), unwanted differences in waiting time to treatment and unequal access to treatment.MethodsCase-mix-adjusted multivariable logistic regressions the odds of EP and access to surgery, radiotherapy and systemic anticancer treatment (SACT). Multivariable quantile regression analyzed time from diagnosis to first treatment.ResultsOf 5713 lung cancer patients diagnosed in Norway in 2015-16, 37.9% (n = 2164) had an EP before diagnosis. Higher age, more advanced stage and more comorbidities were associated with increasing odds of having an EP (P < 0.001) and a lower odds of receiving any treatment (P < 0.001). After adjusting for case-mix, waiting times to curative radiotherapy and SACT were 12.1 days longer [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.2, 14.0] and 5.6 days shorter (95% CI: -7.3, -3.9), respectively, compared with waiting time to surgery. Patients with regional disease experienced a 4.7-day shorter (Coeff: -4.7, 95% CI:-9.4, 0.0) waiting time to curative radiotherapy when compared with patients with localized disease. Patients with a high income had a 22% reduced odds [odds ratio (OR) = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.97] of having an EP, and a 63% (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.21) and a 40% (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.76) increased odds of receiving surgery and SACT, respectively.ConclusionPatients who were older, had advanced disease or increased comorbidities were more likely to have an EP and less likely to receive treatment. While income did not affect the waiting time for lung cancer treatment in Norway, it did affect the likelihood of receiving surgery and SACT.
| S-EPMC8565486 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PURPOSE:To investigate the associations between program-level variables such as organizational structure, workload, and learning environment and residents' development of depressive symptoms during internship. METHOD:Between 2012 and 2015, 1,276 internal medicine interns from 54 U.S. residency programs completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) before internship, and then quarterly throughout the internship. The training environment was assessed via a resident questionnaire and average weekly work hours. The authors gathered program structural variables from the American Medical Association Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA online) and program research rankings from Doximity. Associations between program-level variables and change in depressive symptoms were determined using stepwise linear regression modeling. RESULTS:Mean program PHQ-9 scores increased from 2.3 at baseline to 5.9 during internship (mean difference 3.6; SD 1.4; P < .001), with the mean increase ranging from -0.3 to 8.8 (interquartile range 1.1) among included programs. In multivariable models, faculty feedback (β = -0.37; 95% CI: -0.62, -0.12; P = .005), learning experience in inpatient rotations (β = -0.28; 95% CI: -0.54, -0.02; P = .030), work hours (β = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.56; P = .002), and research ranking position (β = -0.25; 95% CI: -0.47, -0.03; P = .036) were associated with change in depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS:Poor faculty feedback and inpatient learning experience, long work hours, and high institutional research rankings were associated with increased depressive symptoms among internal medicine interns. These factors may be potential targets for interventions to improve wellness and mental health among these professionals.
| S-EPMC6538448 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAlthough bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is associated with lung function deficits in childhood, many who develop BPD have normal lung function in childhood and many without BPD, including those born at 33-34 weeks of gestation, have lung dysfunction in childhood. Since the predictability of BPD for future lung deficits is increasingly doubted, we prospectively recruited preterm-born children to identify early-life factors associated with lung function deficits after preterm birth.MethodsFrom 767 children aged 7-12 years who had their respiratory symptoms assessed, and had spirometry before and after a bronchodilator in our Respiratory Health Outcomes in Neonates (RHiNO) study, 739 (544 preterm-born at ≤34 weeks of gestation and 195 term-born) had satisfactory lung function. Data were analysed using multivariable logistic regression and mediation.ResultsWhen preterm-born children were classified according to their lung function, low lung function (prematurity-associated lung disease (PLD)) was associated with BPD, gestation and intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR) on univariable logistic regression analyses. However, on multivariable logistic regression analyses, gestation (β= -0.153, se 0.051; p=0.003) and IUGR (OR 1.783, 95% CI 1.06-3.00; p=0.029) remained significantly associated with later deficits of lung function, but BPD (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.52-1.89; p=0.974) did not. Mediation analyses confirmed these results.ConclusionsAlthough traditionally BPD has been associated with low lung function in later life, the data show that gestation and IUGR are significantly associated with PLD in childhood, but BPD is not. By identifying children with PLD, we can better understand the underlying mechanisms and develop optimal therapies.
| S-EPMC9095942 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:Recent studies emphasise the importance of timely diagnosis and early initiation of disease-modifying treatment in the long-term prognosis of multiple sclerosis. Objectives:The objective of this study was to investigate factors associated with extended time to diagnosis and time to disease-modifying treatment initiation in the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry. Methods:We used retrospective data (diagnoses 1996-2017) of the survey-based Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry and fitted logistic regression models (extended time to diagnosis ?2 years from first symptoms, extended time to disease-modifying treatment initiation ?1 year from diagnosis) with demographic and a priori defined variables. Results:Our study, based on 996 persons with multiple sclerosis, suggests that 40% had an extended time to diagnosis, and extended time to disease-modifying treatment initiation was seen in 23%. Factors associated with extended time to diagnosis were primary progressive multiple sclerosis (odds ratio (OR) 5.09 (3.12-8.49)), diagnosis setting outside of hospital (neurologist (private practice) OR 1.54 (1.16-2.05)) and more uncommon first symptoms (per additional symptom OR 1.17 (1.06-1.30)). Older age at onset (per additional 5 years OR 0.84 (0.78-0.90)) and gait problems (OR 0.65 (0.47-0.89)) or paresthesia (OR 0.72 (0.54-0.95)) as first symptoms were associated with shorter time to diagnosis. Extended time to disease-modifying treatment initiation was associated with older age at diagnosis (per additional 5 years OR 1.18 (1.09-1.29)). In more recent years, time to diagnosis and time to disease-modifying treatment initiation tended to be shorter. Conclusions:Even in recent periods, substantial and partially systematic variation regarding time to diagnosis and time to disease-modifying treatment initiation remains. With the emerging paradigm of early treatment, the residual variation should be monitored carefully.
| S-EPMC6293378 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDelay in lung cancer treatment is associated with worse survival outcomes. We examined whether there are racial disparities in time from diagnosis to treatment initiation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using data from the National Cancer Data Base, which includes approximately 70% of incident cancer patients across the United States.MethodsWe analyzed 119 184 patients diagnosed with stage I NSCLC from 2008 to 2013. Median times (in days) from diagnosis to treatment initiation for external beam radiation (EBRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and surgery (inclusive of wedge resection, lobectomy, and pneumonectomy) were calculated separately and compared among white vs African American (AA) patients using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Multivariable linear regression assessed racial differences in days to treatment while adjusting for sex, age, insurance status, regional income, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, region, facility type, and treatment. Statistical tests were two-sided.ResultsAA patients had a statistically significantly longer median time to treatment for all three treatment modalities: EBRT 54 days (AA) vs 48 days (white, P < .001); SBRT 66 days vs 55 days (P < .001); surgery 31 vs 26 days (P < .001). In addition, 34% AA vs 24% white patients (P ≤ .001) had treatment initiation eight or more weeks after diagnosis. In multivariable analysis, AA patients experienced an average 8.2-day delay compared with white patients (P < .001).ConclusionsThese results shed light on one possible mechanism of the observed racial disparity in mortality outcomes in NSCLC. Future studies are needed to determine if interventions to reduce treatment delays can reduce racial disparities in this disease.
| S-EPMC6649763 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Tissue biopsies can be burdensome and are only effective in 10-30% of patients with metastasized non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) might be an attractive alternative. We evaluated the costs, throughput time, and diagnostic yield of two diagnostic scenarios with tissue and cfDNA for mNSCLC patients, compared to diagnostics based on tissue biopsy alone. Data were retrieved from 209 stage IV NSCLC patients included in 10 hospitals in the Netherlands in the observational Lung cancer Early Molecular Assessment (LEMA) trial. Discrete event simulation was developed to compare three scenarios, using LEMA data as input where possible: (1) diagnostics with "tissue only"; (2) diagnostics with "cfDNA first", and subsequent tissue biopsy if required (negative for EGFR, BRAF ALK, ROS1); (3) cfDNA if tissue biopsy failed ("tissue first"). Scenario- and probabilistic analyses were performed to quantify uncertainty. In scenario 1, 84% (Credibility Interval [CrI] 70-94%) of the cases had a clinically relevant test result, compared to 93% (CrI 86-98%) in scenario 2, and 93% (CrI 86-99%) in scenario 3. The mean throughput time was 20 days (CrI 17-23) pp in scenario 1, 9 days (CrI 7-11) in scenario 2, and 19 days (CrI 16-22) in scenario 3. Mean costs were €2304 pp (CrI €2067-2507) in scenario 1, compared to €3218 (CrI €3071-3396) for scenario 2, and €2448 (CrI €2382-2506) for scenario 3. Scenarios 2 and 3 led to a reduction in tissue biopsies of 16% and 9%, respectively. In this process-based simulation analysis, the implementation of cfDNA for patients with mNSCLC resulted in faster completion of molecular profiling with more identified targets, with marginal extra costs in scenario 3.
| S-EPMC8997553 | biostudies-literature