Dataset Information

Risk factors for acute kidney injury in older adults with critical illness: a retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) in older adults has not been evaluated systematically. We sought to delineate the determinants of risk for AKI in older compared with younger adults.

Study design

Retrospective analysis of patients hospitalized in July 2000 to September 2008.

Setting & participants

We identified all adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit (n=45,655) in a large tertiary-care university hospital system. We excluded patients receiving dialysis or a kidney transplant prior to hospital admission and patients with baseline creatinine levels ≥ 4mg/dL, liver transplantation, indeterminate AKI status, or unknown age, leaving 39,938 patients.

Predictor

We collected data for multiple susceptibilities and exposures, including age, sex, race, body mass, comorbid conditions, severity of illness, baseline kidney function, sepsis, and shock.

Outcomes

We defined AKI according to KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) criteria. We examined susceptibilities and exposures across age strata for impact on the development of AKI.

Measurements

We calculated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for prediction of AKI across age groups.

Results

25,230 (63.2%) patients were 55 years or older. Overall, 25,120 (62.9%) patients developed AKI (69.2% aged ≥55 years). Examples of risk factors for AKI in the oldest age category (≥75 years) were drugs (vancomycin, aminoglycosides, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories), history of hypertension (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.25), and sepsis (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.68-2.67). Fewer variables remained predictive of AKI as age increased and the model for older patients was less predictive (P<0.001). For the age categories 18 to 54, 55 to 64, 65 to 74, and 75 years or older, AUCs were 0.744 (95% CI, 0.735-0.752), 0.714 (95% CI, 0.702-0.726), 0.706 (95% CI, 0.693-0.718), and 0.673 (95% CI, 0.661-0.685), respectively.

Limitations

Analysis may not apply to non-intensive care unit patients.

Conclusions

The likelihood of developing AKI increases with age; however, the same variables are less predictive for AKI as age increases. Efforts to quantify risk for AKI may be more difficult in older adults.

SUBMITTER: Kane-Gill SL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4442750 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Risk factors for acute kidney injury in older adults with critical illness: a retrospective cohort study.

Kane-Gill Sandra L SL Sileanu Florentina E FE Murugan Raghavan R Trietley Gregory S GS Handler Steven M SM Kellum John A JA

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 20141206 6

<h4>Background</h4>Risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) in older adults has not been evaluated systematically. We sought to delineate the determinants of risk for AKI in older compared with younger adults.<h4>Study design</h4>Retrospective analysis of patients hospitalized in July 2000 to September 2008.<h4>Setting & participants</h4>We identified all adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit (n=45,655) in a large tertiary-care university hospital system. We excluded patients receiving dia ...[more]

PMID: 25488106

Similar Datasets

Project description:The cardiorenal syndrome generally focuses on left ventricular function, and the importance of the right ventricle as a determinant of renal function is described less frequently. In a cohort of critically ill patients with echocardiographic measurements obtained within 24 hours of admission to the intensive care unit, we examined the association of right ventricular function with acute kidney injury (AKI) and AKI-associated mortality. We also examined whether clinical measurement of volume overload modified the association between ventricular function and AKI in a subpopulation with documented admission physical examinations.Among 1879 critically ill patients with echocardiographic ventricular measurements, 43% (n = 807) had ventricular dysfunction-21% (n = 388), 9% (n = 167), and 13% (n = 252) with isolated left ventricular dysfunction, isolated right ventricular dysfunction, and biventricular dysfunction, respectively. Overall, ventricular dysfunction was associated with a 43% higher adjusted risk of AKI (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.80; P = 0.002) compared with those with normal biventricular function, whereas isolated left ventricular dysfunction, isolated right ventricular dysfunction, and biventricular dysfunction were associated with a 1.34 (95% CI 1.00-1.77, P = 0.05), 1.35 (95% CI 0.90-2.10, P = 0.14) and 1.67 (95% CI 1.23-2.31, P = 0.002) higher adjusted risk. Although an episode of AKI was associated with an approximately 2-fold greater risk of hospital mortality in those with isolated left ventricular dysfunction and biventricular dysfunction, in those with isolated right ventricular dysfunction, AKI was associated with a 7.85-fold greater risk of death (95% CI 2.89-21.3, P < 0.001). Independent of ventricular function, peripheral edema was an important determinant of AKI.Like left ventricular function, right ventricular function is an important determinant of AKI and AKI-associated mortality. Volume overload, independently of ventricular function, is a risk factor for AKI. Whether establishment of euvolemia might mitigate AKI risk will require further study.

Project description:To investigate associations between acute care and critical illness hospitalizations and performance on physical functional measures and activities of daily living (ADLs).Prospective cohort study.Large health maintenance organization.Two thousand nine hundred twenty-six participants in Adult Changes in Thought, a study of aging enrolling dementia-free individuals aged 65 and older not living in a nursing home from 1994 to September 30, 2008 (N = 2,926).The exposure of interest was hospitalization during study participation, subdivided by presence of critical illness. Outcomes included gait speed, grip strength, chair stand speed, and difficulty and dependence in performing ADLs measured at biennial visits.Median time between hospital discharge and the next study visit was 311 days (interquartile range (IQR) 151-501 days) after acute care hospitalization and 359 days (IQR 181-420 days) after critical illness hospitalization. Gait speed was slower after acute care (-0.05 m/s, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.01-0.04 m/s slower, P < .001) and critical illness (-0.16 m/s, 95% CI = -0.22 to -0.10, P < .001). Grip was weaker after acute care hospitalization (-0.8 kg, 95% CI = -1.0 to -0.6, P < .001) but not significantly different after critical illness hospitalization. Chair-stand speed was slower after acute care hospitalization (-0.04 stands/s, 95% CVI = -0.05 to -0.04, P < .001) and critical illness hospitalization (-0.09, 95% CI = -0.15 to -0.03, P = .003). The odds of difficulty with (odds ratio (OR) = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2-1.6, P < .001) or dependence in (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.2-3.2, P = .006) one or more ADLs was higher after acute care hospitalization, as were the odds of difficulty with (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.1-3.6, P = .03) or dependence in (OR = 7.9, 95% CI = 2.5-25.7, P = .001) one or more ADLs after critical illness.In older adults, hospitalization, especially for critical illness, was associated with clinically relevant decline in gait and chair stand speed and strongly associated with difficulty with and dependence in ADLs.

Project description:ContextStudies suggest that many survivors of critical illness experience long-term cognitive impairment but have not included premorbid measures of cognitive functioning and have not evaluated risk for dementia associated with critical illness.ObjectivesTo determine whether decline in cognitive function was greater among older individuals who experienced acute care or critical illness hospitalizations relative to those not hospitalized and to determine whether the risk for incident dementia differed by these exposures.Design, setting, and participantsAnalysis of data from a prospective cohort study from 1994 through 2007 comprising 2929 individuals 65 years old and older without dementia at baseline residing in the community in the Seattle area and belonging to the Group Health Cooperative. Participants with 2 or more study visits were included, and those who had a hospitalization for a diagnosis of primary brain injury were censored at the time of hospitalization. Individuals were screened with the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) (score range, 0-100) every 2 years at follow-up visits, and those with a score less than 86 underwent a clinical examination for dementia.Main outcome measuresScore on the CASI at follow-up study visits and incident dementia diagnosed in study participants, adjusted for baseline cognitive scores, age, and other risk factors.ResultsDuring a mean (SD) follow-up of 6.1 (3.2) years, 1601 participants had no hospitalization, 1287 had 1 or more noncritical illness hospitalizations, and 41 had 1 or more critical illness hospitalizations. The CASI score was assessed more than 45 days after discharge for 94.3% of participants. Adjusted CASI scores averaged 1.01 points lower for visits following acute care illness hospitalization compared with follow-up visits not following any hospitalization (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.33 to -0.70; P < .001) and 2.14 points lower on average for visits following critical illness hospitalization (95% CI, -4.24 to -0.03; P = .047). There were 146 cases of dementia among those not hospitalized, 228 cases of dementia among those with 1 or more noncritical illness hospitalizations, and 5 cases of dementia among those with 1 or more critical illness hospitalizations. The adjusted hazard ratio for incident dementia was 1.4 following a noncritical illness hospitalization (95% CI, 1.1 to 1.7; P = .001) and 2.3 following a critical illness hospitalization (95% CI, 0.9 to 5.7; P = .09).ConclusionsAmong a cohort of older adults without dementia at baseline, those who experienced acute care hospitalization and critical illness hospitalization had a greater likelihood of cognitive decline compared with those who had no hospitalization. Noncritical illness hospitalization was significantly associated with the development of dementia.

Project description:BackgroundInitial reports indicate a high incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), but more data are required to clarify if COVID-19 is an independent risk factor for AKI and how COVID-19-associated AKI may differ from AKI due to other causes. We therefore sought to study the relationship between COVID-19, AKI, and outcomes in a retrospective cohort of patients admitted to 2 acute hospitals in Derby, United Kingdom.Methods and findingsWe extracted electronic data from 4,759 hospitalised patients who were tested for COVID-19 between 5 March 2020 and 12 May 2020. The data were linked to electronic patient records and laboratory information management systems. The primary outcome was AKI, and secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, need for ventilatory support, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and length of stay. As compared to the COVID-19-negative group (n = 3,374), COVID-19 patients (n = 1,161) were older (72.1 ± 16.1 versus 65.3 ± 20.4 years, p < 0.001), had a greater proportion of men (56.6% versus 44.9%, p < 0.001), greater proportion of Asian ethnicity (8.3% versus 4.0%, p < 0.001), and lower proportion of white ethnicity (75.5% versus 82.5%, p < 0.001). AKI developed in 304 (26.2%) COVID-19-positive patients (COVID-19 AKI) and 420 (12.4%) COVID-19-negative patients (AKI controls). COVID-19 patients aged 65 to 84 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11 to 2.50), needing mechanical ventilation (OR 8.74, 95% CI 5.27 to 14.77), having congestive cardiac failure (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.50), chronic liver disease (OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.17 to 10.00), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.97 to 4.01) had higher odds for developing AKI. Mortality was higher in COVID-19 AKI versus COVID-19 patients without AKI (60.5% versus 27.4%, p < 0.001), and AKI was an independent predictor of mortality (OR 3.27, 95% CI 2.39 to 4.48). Compared with AKI controls, COVID-19 AKI was observed in a higher proportion of men (58.9% versus 51%, p = 0.04) and lower proportion with white ethnicity (74.7% versus 86.9%, p = 0.003); was more frequently associated with cerebrovascular disease (11.8% versus 6.0%, p = 0.006), chronic lung disease (28.0% versus 19.3%, p = 0.007), diabetes (24.7% versus 17.9%, p = 0.03), and CKD (34.2% versus 20.0%, p < 0.001); and was more likely to be hospital acquired (61.2% versus 46.4%, p < 0.001). Mortality was higher in the COVID-19 AKI as compared to the control AKI group (60.5% versus 27.6%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, AKI patients aged 65 to 84 years, (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.77 to 5.35) and ≥85 years of age (OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.87 to 6.70), peak AKI stage 2 (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.90), AKI stage 3 (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.57), and COVID-19 (OR 3.80, 95% CI 2.62 to 5.51) had higher odds of death. Limitations of the study include retrospective design, lack of urinalysis data, and low ethnic diversity of the region.ConclusionsWe observed a high incidence of AKI in patients with COVID-19 that was associated with a 3-fold higher odds of death than COVID-19 without AKI and a 4-fold higher odds of death than AKI due to other causes. These data indicate that patients with COVID-19 should be monitored for the development of AKI and measures taken to prevent this.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04407156.

Dataset Information

Risk factors for acute kidney injury in older adults with critical illness: a retrospective cohort study.

Background

Study design

Setting & participants

Predictor

Outcomes

Measurements

Results

Limitations

Conclusions

Publications

Risk factors for acute kidney injury in older adults with critical illness: a retrospective cohort study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets