Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Does dishonesty really invite third-party punishment? Results of a more stringent test.


ABSTRACT: Many experiments have demonstrated that people are willing to incur cost to punish norm violators even when they are not directly harmed by the violation. Such altruistic third-party punishment is often considered an evolutionary underpinning of large-scale human cooperation. However, some scholars argue that previously demonstrated altruistic third-party punishment against fairness-norm violations may be an experimental artefact. For example, envy-driven retaliatory behaviour (i.e. spite) towards better-off unfair game players may be misidentified as altruistic punishment. Indeed, a recent experiment demonstrated that participants ceased to inflict third-party punishment against an unfair player once a series of key methodological problems were systematically controlled for. Noticing that a previous finding regarding apparently altruistic third-party punishment against honesty-norm violations may have been subject to methodological issues, we used a different and what we consider to be a more sound design to evaluate these findings. Third-party punishment against dishonest players withstood this more stringent test.

SUBMITTER: Konishi N 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4455743 | biostudies-literature | 2015 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3443148 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7051041 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5013189 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6414674 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5106004 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8559474 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5931604 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8211016 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10307782 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4733334 | biostudies-literature