Dataset Information

Time Seeing a Hand Surgeon Is Not Associated With Patient Satisfaction.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Previous studies, predominantly in the primary care setting, identified time spent with the physician as an important predictor of satisfaction. It is unknown if the same holds true in hand surgery.

Questions/purposes

Is patient satisfaction measured immediately after an office visit associated with the duration of time spent with the hand surgeon? What other factors are associated with satisfaction directly after the visits and 2 weeks after the appointment?

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 81 patients visiting our hand and upper extremity surgery outpatient clinic. We recorded their demographics and measured physical function, pain behavior, symptoms of depression, time spent in the waiting room, time spent with the physician, and patient satisfaction. Office times were measured using our patient ambulatory tracking system and by a research assistant outside the clinic room. To assess satisfaction we used items from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey (a federally developed standardized survey instrument) relevant to our study. Two weeks later, 51 (64%) patients were available for telephone followup and the same measures were completed. Mean time spent with the hand surgeon was 8 ± 5 minutes and mean in-office wait time to see the hand surgeon was 32 ± 18 minutes. A priori power analyses indicated that 77 patients would provide 80% power to detect an effect size f(2) = 0.18 for a regression with five predictors. This means that we would detect time spent with the physician as a significant factor if it accounted for 7% or more of the variability in satisfaction.

Results

Time spent with the hand surgeon was not associated with patient satisfaction measured directly after the visit (r = -0.023; p = 0.84). Longer time waiting to see the physician correlated with decreased patient satisfaction (r = -0.30; p = 0.0057). The final multivariable model for increased satisfaction directly after the office visit included shorter waiting time (regression coefficient [?] -0.0014; partial R(2) 0.094; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.0024 to -0.00042; p = 0.006) and being married/living with a partner (? 0.057; partial R(2) 0.11; 95% CI, 0.021-0.093; p = 0.002 [adjusted R(2) 0.18; p < 0.001]). Similarly, multivariable analysis found higher patient satisfaction 2 weeks after the visit to be independently associated with shorter waiting time (? -0.0037; partial R(2) 0.10; 95% CI, -0.0070 to -0.00054; p = 0.023) and being married/living with a partner (? 0.15; partial R(2) 0.12; 95% CI, 0.033-0.26; p = 0.012 [adjusted R(2) 0.16; p = 0.0052]).

Conclusions

Patient satisfaction among patients undergoing hand surgery may relate more to shorter time in the waiting room and to the quality more than the quantity of time spent with the patient.

Level of evidence

Level II, prognostic study.

SUBMITTER: Teunis T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4457762 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Time Seeing a Hand Surgeon Is Not Associated With Patient Satisfaction.

Teunis Teun T Thornton Emily R ER Jayakumar Prakash P Ring David D

Clinical orthopaedics and related research 20141205 7

<h4>Background</h4>Previous studies, predominantly in the primary care setting, identified time spent with the physician as an important predictor of satisfaction. It is unknown if the same holds true in hand surgery.<h4>Questions/purposes</h4>Is patient satisfaction measured immediately after an office visit associated with the duration of time spent with the hand surgeon? What other factors are associated with satisfaction directly after the visits and 2 weeks after the appointment?<h4>Methods ...[more]

PMID: 25475717

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo determine the most important factors to patients across the United States in selecting an orthopaedic sports medicine surgeon.MethodsIn this cross-sectional survey study, adult U.S. residents were surveyed using Amazon Mechanical Turk, a validated survey tool. Data included demographics and the relative importance of both pre-office and in-office factors that determine how patients select an orthopaedic sports medicine surgeon. Results were compiled, and factors were compared by patient demographics.ResultsOf 1,074 respondents, 56.3% were male, and 60.0% were 25 to 40 years old. Responses were geographically diverse. The most important factors in selecting a sports medicine surgeon (graded on a 0-10 scale) were surgeon professionalism and personality (6.6), quality of the hospital/office facilities (6.4), and how much time the surgeon spends with the patient (6.4). Each of these in-office factors were more important than pre-office factors, the most important of which were reputation of the surgeon's hospital or group (6.3), surgeon's reviews on medical review websites (6.2), and surgeon's educational background (6.0). The least important factors were surgeon's sex (3.7), marketing of the surgeon (4.2), and surgeon's social media accounts (4.3). A social media account was taken into consideration at least "a little" by nearly two-thirds of respondents. The most preferred surgeon personality was a balance of professional and lighthearted (66.9%), with strictly professional (27.6%) or largely lighthearted (5.6%) less preferred.ConclusionsThe most important factors to patients in selecting their orthopaedic sports medicine surgeon, regardless of patient sex, race, or geography, are related to the patient's in-office experience, including surgeon's professionalism/personality, how much time the surgeon spends with the patient, and quality of the hospital/office facilities. Surgeons should consider prioritizing a professional office environment and taking the time to get to know patients for the benefit of their patients and their practice.Clinical relevanceThe market for orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons is competitive. It is important to know what qualities of a surgeon and his or her practice are important to patients.

Project description:IntroductionAssessing patient expectations in orthopaedic surgery has gained significant importance over time. However, there have been only a few studies on how to measure such expectations in hand surgery. Against the backdrop, the study was designed to develop a valid and reliable expectations survey for patients undergoing hand surgery and to identify the correlations between preoperative expectations and postoperative satisfaction.Materials and methodsThis is a three-phase prospective cohort study. In the first phase of the study (146 patients), patient expectations were assessed while developing a draft questionnaire based on frequency and clinical relevance. In the second phase (154 patients newly included), test-retest reliability was measured to ensure test consistency. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) served as a basis for developing the final survey questionnaire. In the third phase, we followed up with patients, who completed the preoperative expectations survey, 3 months after surgery to assess the fulfillment of their expectations. The Pearson correlation method was used to measure the association between preoperative expectations and postoperative satisfaction.ResultsIn the first phase, 146 patients shared 406 different expectations, which were grouped into nine categories. Then, in the second phase, the final survey was populated by questionnaire items under respective category that have revealed strong test-retest reliability (ICC of 0.91). A significant positive correlation between patient expectations and satisfaction was observed (R = 0.181, p = 0.034).ConclusionThe survey was designed to offer a valid and reliable approach for the comprehensive assessment of patient expectations in hand surgery. The survey results show that patients with high expectations tend to be more satisfied with surgical outcomes. It is strongly believed that this approach would serve as a useful tool at a time when patient perspective is taken into account increasingly more in the clinical practice.

Project description:ImportancePostoperative complications remain common after surgery, but little is known about the extent of variation in operative technical skill and whether variation is associated with patient outcomes.ObjectivesTo examine the (1) variation in technical skill scores of practicing surgeons, (2) association between technical skills and patient outcomes, and (3) amount of variation in patient outcomes explained by a surgeon's technical skill.Design, setting, and participantsIn this quality improvement study, 17 practicing surgeons submitted a video of a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy that was then rated by at least 10 blinded peer surgeons and 2 expert raters. The association between surgeon technical skill scores and risk-adjusted outcomes was examined using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The association between technical skill scores and outcomes was examined for colorectal procedures and noncolorectal procedures (ie, assessed on whether technical skills demonstrated during colectomy were associated with patient outcomes across other cases). In addition, the proportion of patient outcomes explained by technical skill scores was examined using robust regression techniques. The study was conducted from September 23, 2016, to February 10, 2018; data analysis was performed from November 2018 to January 2019.ExposuresColorectal and noncolorectal procedures.Main outcomes and measuresAny complication, mortality, unplanned hospital readmission, unplanned reoperation related to principal procedure, surgical site infection, and death or serious morbidity.ResultsOf the 17 surgeons included in the study, 13 were men (76%). The participants had a range from 1 to 28 years in surgical practice (median, 11 years). Based on 10 or more reviewers per video and with a maximum quality score of 5, overall technical skill scores ranged from 2.8 to 4.6. From 2014 to 2016, study participants performed a total of 3063 procedures (1120 colectomies). Higher technical skill scores were significantly associated with lower rates of any complication (15.5% vs 20.6%, P = .03; Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient r = -0.54, P = .03), unplanned reoperation (4.7% vs 7.2%, P = .02; r = -0.60, P = .01), and a composite measure of death or serious morbidity (15.9% vs 21.4%, P = .02; r = -0.60, P = .01) following colectomy. Similar associations were found between colectomy technical skill scores and patient outcomes for all types of procedures performed by a surgeon. Overall, technical skill scores appeared to account for 25.8% of the variation in postcolectomy complication rates and 27.5% of the variation when including noncolectomy complication rates.Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this study suggest that there is wide variation in technical skill among practicing surgeons, accounting for more than 25% of the variation in patient outcomes. Higher colectomy technical skill scores appear to be associated with lower complication rates for colectomy and for all other procedures performed by a surgeon. Efforts to improve surgeon technical skills may result in better patient outcomes.

Project description:Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine if use of an automated irrigation pump (AIP) during ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) affects circulating nurse labor, irrigation-related issues, and surgeon and nurse satisfaction when compared to manual hand pump (HP) irrigation. Methods: Eighty consecutive adult patients undergoing unilateral URS or PCNL were prospectively randomized to irrigation with the HP or AIP. Preoperative pump setup time, intraoperative pump maintenance time, total pump time (setup+maintenance), and the number of irrigation-related concerns verbalized by the surgeon intraoperatively were recorded; postoperatively, surgeons and nurses rated their satisfaction with the irrigation system (1?=?highly dissatisfied to 10?=?highly satisfied). Results: Eighty patients were enrolled (39 AIP and 41 HP); 51 patients underwent URS and 29 patients underwent PCNL. On univariate analysis, the AIP resulted in a significantly reduced total pump time for URS (2.9 vs 5.9 minutes) and PCNL (4.6 vs 33.9 minutes; p?<?0.001). The number of irrigation-related concerns was significantly lower in the AIP group during URS (1.2 vs 2.8, p?<?0.001), but not during PCNL (1.9 vs 4.0, p?=?0.07). The AIP was associated with significantly higher nurse satisfaction during URS (9.2/10 vs 6.5/10, p?<?0.001) and PCNL (9.4/10 vs 4.4/10, p?=?0.001). There was no significant association between pump type and surgeon satisfaction. On multivariate analysis of URS cases controlling for body mass index and number of stones, use of the AIP was a predictor of total pump time <5 minutes (odds ratio 25.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0-165.4; p?<?0.001) and favorable (8-10/10) nurse satisfaction rating (odds ratio 25.4, 95% CI 4.1-164.0; p?<?0.001). Operative time, stone-free rate, and liters of irrigant used with the HP and AIP were similar. Conclusions: During URS and PCNL, the AIP was associated with a significant reduction in irrigation pump time and higher nurse satisfaction.

Dataset Information

Time Seeing a Hand Surgeon Is Not Associated With Patient Satisfaction.

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of evidence

Publications

Time Seeing a Hand Surgeon Is Not Associated With Patient Satisfaction.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets