Dataset Information

Phase resetting in duper hamsters: specificity to photic zeitgebers and circadian phase.

ABSTRACT: The duper mutation in Syrian hamsters shortens the free-running period of locomotor activity (?DD) to about 23 h and results in a type 0 phase-response curve (PRC) to 15-min light pulses. To determine whether exaggerated phase shifts are specific to photic cues and/or restricted to subjective night, we subjected hamsters to novel wheel confinements and dark pulses during subjective day. Small phase shifts elicited by the nonphotic cue were comparable in mutant and wild-type (WT) hamsters, but dark pulses triggered larger shifts in dupers. To assess further the effects of the duper mutation on light-dark transitions, we transferred hamsters between constant light (LL) and constant dark (DD) or between DD and LL at various circadian phases. Duper hamsters displayed significantly larger phase shifts than WT hamsters when transferred from LL to DD during subjective day and from DD to LL during subjective night. The variability of phase shifts in response to all light/dark transitions was significantly greater in duper hamsters at all time points. In addition, most duper hamsters, but none of the WTs, displayed transient ultradian wheel-running patterns for 5 to 12 days when transferred from light to dark at CT 18. The ?(2) periodogram and autocorrelation analyses indicate that these ultradian patterns differ from the disruption of rhythmicity by SCN lesions or exposure to constant bright light. We conclude that the duper mutation specifically amplifies phase shifts to photic cues and may destabilize coupling of circadian organization upon photic challenge due to weakened coupling among components of the circadian pacemaker. Mathematical modeling of the circadian pacemaker supports this hypothesis.

SUBMITTER: Manoogian EN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4461060 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Phase resetting in duper hamsters: specificity to photic zeitgebers and circadian phase.

Manoogian Emily N C EN Leise Tanya L TL Bittman Eric L EL

Journal of biological rhythms 20150129 2

The duper mutation in Syrian hamsters shortens the free-running period of locomotor activity (τDD) to about 23 h and results in a type 0 phase-response curve (PRC) to 15-min light pulses. To determine whether exaggerated phase shifts are specific to photic cues and/or restricted to subjective night, we subjected hamsters to novel wheel confinements and dark pulses during subjective day. Small phase shifts elicited by the nonphotic cue were comparable in mutant and wild-type (WT) hamsters, but da ...[more]

PMID: 25633984

Similar Datasets

Project description:Shiftwork and circadian disruption are associated with adverse metabolic effects. Therefore, we examined whether clinical biomarkers of metabolic health are under endogenous circadian regulation using a 40 hours constant routine protocol (CR; constant environmental and behavioral conditions) and evaluated the impact of typical daily conditions with periodic sleep and meals (baseline; 8 hours sleep at night, four meals during a 16 hour wake episode) on the phase and amplitude of these rhythms. Additionally, we tested whether these circadian rhythms are reset during simulated shiftwork. Under CR (n = 16 males, mean age ± SD = 23.4 ± 2.3 years), we found endogenous circadian rhythms in cholesterol, HDL and LDL, albumin and total protein, and VLDL and triglyceride. The rhythms were masked under baseline conditions except for cholesterol, which had near-identical phases under both conditions. Resetting of the cholesterol rhythm and Dim Light Melatonin Onset (DLMO) was then tested in a study of simulated shiftwork (n = 25, 14 females, 36.3 ± 8.9 years) across four protocols; two with abrupt 8 hour delay shifts and exposure to either blue-enriched or standard white light; and either an abrupt or gradual 8 hour advance (1.6 hours/day over 5 days) both with exposure to blue-enriched white light. In the delay protocols, the cholesterol rhythm shifted later by -3.7 hours and -4.2 hours, respectively, compared to -6.6 hours and -4.7 hours, for DLMO. There was a significant advance in cholesterol in the abrupt (+5.1 hours) but not the gradual (+2.1 hours) protocol, compared to +3.1 hours and +2.8 hours in DLMO, respectively. Exploratory group analysis comparing the phases of all metabolic biomarkers under both studies showed evidence of phase shifts due to simulated shiftwork. These results show that clinical biomarkers of metabolic health are under endogenous circadian regulation but that the expression of these rhythms is substantially influenced by environmental factors. These rhythms can also be reset, which has implications for understanding how both behavioral changes and circadian shifts due to shiftwork may disrupt metabolic function.

Project description:BACKGROUND. In humans, a single light exposure of 12 minutes and multiple-millisecond light exposures can shift the phase of the circadian pacemaker. We investigated the response of the human circadian pacemaker to a single 15-second or 2-minute light pulse administered during the biological night. METHODS. Twenty-six healthy individuals participated in a 9-day inpatient protocol that included assessment of dim light melatonin onset time (DLMO time) before and after exposure to a single 15-second (n = 8) or 2-minute (n = 12) pulse of bright light (9,500 lux; 4,100 K fluorescent) or control background dim light (<3 lux; n = 6). Phase shifts were calculated as the difference in clock time between the two phase estimates. RESULTS. Both 15-second and 2-minute exposures induced phase delay shifts [median (± SD)] of -34.8 ± 47.2 minutes and -45.4 ± 28.4 minutes, respectively, that were significantly (P = 0.04) greater than the control condition (advance shift: +22.3 ± 51.3 minutes) but were not significantly different from each other. Comparisons with historic data collected under the same conditions confirmed a nonlinear relationship between exposure duration and the magnitude of phase shift. CONCLUSIONS. Our results underscore the exquisite sensitivity of the human pacemaker to even short-duration single exposures to light. These findings may have real-world implications for circadian disruption induced by exposure to brief light stimuli at night. TRIAL REGISTRATION. The study was registered as a clinical trial on www.clinicaltrials.org, NCT #01330992. FUNDING. Funding for this study was provided by NSBRI HFP02802 and NIH P01-AG09975, R01-HL114088 (EBK), RC2-HL101340-0 (EBK, SWL, SAR, REK), K02-HD045459 (EBK), K24-HL105664 (EBK), T32-HL07901 (MSH, SAR), HL094654 (CAC), and AG044416 (JFD). The project described was supported by NIH grant 1UL1 TR001102-01, 8UL1TR000170-05, UL1 RR 025758, Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science.

Dataset Information

Phase resetting in duper hamsters: specificity to photic zeitgebers and circadian phase.

Publications

Phase resetting in duper hamsters: specificity to photic zeitgebers and circadian phase.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets