Dataset Information

Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.

ABSTRACT: Many patients have symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) and are often evaluated with the use of diagnostic testing, although there are limited data from randomized trials to guide care.We randomly assigned 10,003 symptomatic patients to a strategy of initial anatomical testing with the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or to functional testing (exercise electrocardiography, nuclear stress testing, or stress echocardiography). The composite primary end point was death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, or major procedural complication. Secondary end points included invasive cardiac catheterization that did not show obstructive CAD and radiation exposure.The mean age of the patients was 60.8±8.3 years, 52.7% were women, and 87.7% had chest pain or dyspnea on exertion. The mean pretest likelihood of obstructive CAD was 53.3±21.4%. Over a median follow-up period of 25 months, a primary end-point event occurred in 164 of 4996 patients in the CTA group (3.3%) and in 151 of 5007 (3.0%) in the functional-testing group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.29; P=0.75). CTA was associated with fewer catheterizations showing no obstructive CAD than was functional testing (3.4% vs. 4.3%, P=0.02), although more patients in the CTA group underwent catheterization within 90 days after randomization (12.2% vs. 8.1%). The median cumulative radiation exposure per patient was lower in the CTA group than in the functional-testing group (10.0 mSv vs. 11.3 mSv), but 32.6% of the patients in the functional-testing group had no exposure, so the overall exposure was higher in the CTA group (mean, 12.0 mSv vs. 10.1 mSv; P<0.001).In symptomatic patients with suspected CAD who required noninvasive testing, a strategy of initial CTA, as compared with functional testing, did not improve clinical outcomes over a median follow-up of 2 years. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; PROMISE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01174550.).

SUBMITTER: Douglas PS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4473773 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.

Douglas Pamela S PS Hoffmann Udo U Patel Manesh R MR Mark Daniel B DB Al-Khalidi Hussein R HR Cavanaugh Brendan B Cole Jason J Dolor Rowena J RJ Fordyce Christopher B CB Huang Megan M Khan Muhammad Akram MA Kosinski Andrzej S AS Krucoff Mitchell W MW Malhotra Vinay V Picard Michael H MH Udelson James E JE Velazquez Eric J EJ Yow Eric E Cooper Lawton S LS Lee Kerry L KL

The New England journal of medicine 20150314 14

<h4>Background</h4>Many patients have symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) and are often evaluated with the use of diagnostic testing, although there are limited data from randomized trials to guide care.<h4>Methods</h4>We randomly assigned 10,003 symptomatic patients to a strategy of initial anatomical testing with the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or to functional testing (exercise electrocardiography, nuclear stress testing, or stress echocardiography) ...[more]

PMID: 25773919

Similar Datasets

Project description:PROMISE (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) found that initial use of at least 64-slice multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) versus functional diagnostic testing strategies did not improve clinical outcomes in stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring noninvasive testing.To conduct an economic analysis for PROMISE (a major secondary aim of the study).Prospective economic study from the U.S. perspective. Comparisons were made according to the intention-to-treat principle, and CIs were calculated using bootstrap methods. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01174550).190 U.S. centers.9649 U.S. patients enrolled in PROMISE between July 2010 and September 2013. Median follow-up was 25 months.Technical costs of the initial (outpatient) testing strategy were estimated from Premier Research Database data. Hospital-based costs were estimated using hospital bills and Medicare cost-charge ratios. Physician fees were taken from the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Costs were expressed in 2014 U.S. dollars, discounted at 3% annually, and estimated out to 3 years using inverse probability weighting methods.The mean initial testing costs were $174 for exercise electrocardiography; $404 for CTA; $501 to $514 for pharmacologic and exercise stress echocardiography, respectively; and $946 to $1132 for exercise and pharmacologic stress nuclear testing, respectively. Mean costs at 90 days were $2494 for the CTA strategy versus $2240 for the functional strategy (mean difference, $254 [95% CI, -$634 to $906]). The difference was associated with more revascularizations and catheterizations (4.25 per 100 patients) with CTA use. After 90 days, the mean cost difference between the groups out to 3 years remained small.Cost weights for test strategies were obtained from sources outside PROMISE.Computed tomography angiography and functional diagnostic testing strategies in patients with suspected CAD have similar costs through 3 years of follow-up.National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Project description:BackgroundThe Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial found that initial use of ≥64 detector-row computed tomography angiography versus standard functional testing strategies (exercise ECG, stress nuclear methods, or stress echocardiography) did not improve clinical outcomes in 10 003 stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease requiring noninvasive testing. Symptom burden and quality of life (QOL) were major secondary outcomes.Methods and resultsWe prospectively collected a battery of QOL instruments in 5985 patients at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization. The prespecified primary QOL measures were the Duke Activity Status Index and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire frequency and QOL scales. All comparisons were made as randomized. Baseline variables were well balanced in the 2982 patients randomly assigned to computed tomography angiography testing and the 3003 patients randomly assigned to functional testing. The Duke Activity Status Index improved substantially in both groups over the first 6 months following testing, but we found no evidence for a strategy-related difference (mean difference [anatomic - functional] at 24 months of follow-up, 0.1 [95% confidence interval, -0.9 to 1.1]). Similar results were seen for the Seattle Angina Questionnaire frequency scale (mean difference at 24 months, -0.2; 95% confidence interval, -0.8 to 0.4) and QOL scale (mean difference at 24 months, -0.2; 95% confidence interval, -1.3 to 0.9). None of the secondary QOL measures showed a consistent strategy-related difference.ConclusionsIn symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease who required noninvasive testing, symptoms and QOL improved significantly. However, a strategy of initial anatomic testing, in comparison with functional testing, did not provide an incremental benefit for QOL over 2 years of follow-up.Clinical trial registrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01174550.

Project description:BackgroundConsensus guidelines recommend periodic screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors treated with radiation therapy (RT) to the chest. However, the prognostic utility of screening strategies in this population remains unclear. We evaluated the association between functional testing, coronary artery calcifications (CAC), and guideline-based risk assessment and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in HL survivors treated with RT.MethodsWe retrospectively studied HL survivors treated with RT who underwent functional testing between 2003 and 2020 and chest computed tomography (CT) within 12 months of each other at our center. CAC was assessed semi-quantitatively from CT images. Cardiovascular risk was estimated using the 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Diagnostic test characteristics were calculated using major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during follow-up as the gold standard.ResultsThe study included 159 patients (median age at functional testing 48 years, median age at HL diagnosis 27 years, 62.9% female). Abnormal functional testing had the highest specificity (94.2% (95% CI 88.4%-97.6%)) and positive likelihood ratio (4.55 (95% CI 1.86-11.13)) while CAC had the highest sensitivity (63.2% (95% CI 46.0%-78.2%)) and lowest negative likelihood ratio (0.52 (95% CI 0.34-0.80)). Specificity for ACC/AHA risk assessment was also high (88.5% (95% CI 81.1%-93.7%)). Over 3.3 years of follow-up, abnormal functional testing (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 5.10, 95% CI 2.41 - 10.78, p < 0.001) and CAC (adjusted SHR 3.58, 95% CI 1.35 - 9.47, p = 0.010) were both significantly associated with MACE.ConclusionsIn HL survivors treated with RT, both abnormal functional testing and ACC/AHA risk assessment had high specificity for subsequent MACE, but CAC had higher sensitivity. Further research is needed to inform CAD screening and primary prevention strategies in this population.

Dataset Information

Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.

Publications

Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets